Social support among gender diverse people: Are we measuring what we think we are?

被引:1
|
作者
Barry, Caitlin [1 ]
Meghji, Suraya [2 ]
Jackman, Victoria [3 ]
Trepanier, Camden [1 ]
Coyle, Shannon [1 ]
Jacobson, Jill A. [1 ]
Stewart, Jeremy G. [1 ]
Pukall, Caroline F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Psychol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Dept Rehabil Therapy, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] Mem Univ, Dept Med, St John, NF, Canada
关键词
Gender diverse people; multidimensional scale of perceived social support; non-binary; psychology; psychometrics; transgender; MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALE; MENTAL-HEALTH; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; BINARY TRANSGENDER; FIT INDEXES; STRESS; FAMILIES; GAY; VICTIMIZATION; POPULATIONS;
D O I
10.1080/26895269.2024.2371417
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo assess social support among gender diverse people, measures normed and validated with cisgender participants are used, most commonly the Multidimensional Scale of Social Support (MSPSS). Despite widespread use, the psychometric properties of the MSPSS have not been systematically investigated among gender diverse people. Thus, it is unclear whether use of the MSPSS is appropriate for this population.MethodUsing a mixed-method approach (e.g. deductive thematic analysis and confirmatory factor analyses), we explored the factor structure of the MSPSS among gender diverse participants (N = 428). The study was conducted in Canada between 2019 and 2020.ResultsAfter running confirmatory factor analyses on MSPSS items, the factor structure differed from prior studies of cisgender participants. First, support from a significant other did not correlate with support from family or friends, suggesting its inclusion in a global measure of social support may distort findings when all domains are combined. Second although social support from family and friends emerged as two separate domains, qualitative data suggested that the boundaries between these forms of support were unclear. A deductive thematic analysis further highlighted properties of the scale that may not align with gender diverse peoples' experiences.ConclusionsOverall, these findings raise questions about the interpretation of the MSPSS when used with gender diverse people and suggest that an adapted or newly developed measure is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do we really measure what we think we are measuring?
    Gordillo, Dario
    Cruz, Janir Ramos da
    Moreno, Dana
    Garobbio, Simona
    Herzog, Michael H.
    ISCIENCE, 2023, 26 (02)
  • [2] Validity of polygenic risk scores: are we measuring what we think we are?
    Janssens, A. Cecile J. W.
    HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2019, 28 (R2) : R143 - R150
  • [3] We are what we think
    不详
    LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2002, 33 (05) : P1 - +
  • [4] We Are What We (Think We) Eat
    Sabiston, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2009, 45 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [5] Resampling model of the complement component functional assay: Are we measuring what we think we are measuring?
    Pavlov, Igor Y.
    Delgado, Julio C.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2013, 421 : 87 - 90
  • [6] Resampling model of the complement component functional assay: Are we measuring what we think we are measuring?
    Pavlov, I.
    Delgado, J.
    MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 56 (03) : 292 - 292
  • [7] Gender and Emotion: What We Think We Know, What We Need to Know, and Why It Matters
    Shields, Stephanie A.
    PSYCHOLOGY OF WOMEN QUARTERLY, 2013, 37 (04) : 423 - 435
  • [8] Neonatal Pressure Support Ventilation: Are We Doing What We Think We Are Doing?
    Hokenson, Michael A.
    Shepherd, Edward G.
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2014, 59 (10) : 1606 - 1607
  • [9] What we think and what we know
    Buse, J
    Raftery, L
    DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (10) : 1876 - 1878
  • [10] We seldom think of what we have, but always think of what we miss
    Baitz, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 (02): : 77 - 78