Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to statins according to comorbidities and co-medications: A population-based study

被引:0
|
作者
Corn, Giulia [1 ,6 ]
Lund, Marie [1 ,2 ]
Andersson, Niklas W. [1 ]
Dohlmann, Tine L. [1 ]
Hlatky, Mark A. [4 ,5 ]
Wohlfahrt, Jan [1 ,7 ]
Melbye, Mads [3 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Statens Serum Inst, Dept Epidemiol Res, Artillerivej 5, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Policy, Stanford, CA USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA
[6] Danish Canc Inst, Stat & Data Anal, Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Danish Canc Inst, Canc Epidemiol & Surveillance, Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Danish Canc Inst, Copenhagen, Denmark
[9] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, KG Jebsen Ctr Genet Epidemiol, Trondheim, Norway
[10] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
ATORVASTATIN; METFORMIN; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; ROSUVASTATIN; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2024.04.018
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The response of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to statin therapy is variable, and may be affected by the presence of co-morbid conditions or the use of concomitant medications. Systematic variation in the response to statins based on these factors could affect the selection of the statin treatment regimen in population subgroups. We investigated whether common comorbidities and co-medications had clinically important effects on statin responses in individual patients. Methods This register-based cohort study included 89,006 simvastatin or atorvastatin initiators with measurements of pre-statin and on-statin LDL-C levels, in Denmark, 2008-2018. We defined statin response as the percentage reduction in LDL-C, and used linear regression to estimate percentage reduction differences (PRD) according to 175 chronic comorbidities and 99 co-medications. We evaluated both the statistical significance ( P -values corrected for multiple testing) and the clinical importance (PRD of 5 percentage points or more) of the observed associations. Results Concomitant use of oral blood-glucose lowering drugs, which included metformin in 96% of treated individuals, was associated with a greater response to statin therapy that was both statistically significant and clinically important, with a PRD of 5.18 (95% confidence interval: 4.79 to 5.57). No other comorbidity or co-medication reached the prespecified thresholds for a significant, clinically important effect on statin response. Overall, comorbidities and co-medications had little effect on statin response, and altogether explained only 1.7% of the total observed population variance. Conclusion Most of the studied comorbidities and co-medications did not have a clinically important effect on statin response, suggesting no need to modify treatment regimens. However, use of metformin was associated with a significantly enhanced LDL-C response to statins, suggesting that lower statin doses may be effective in patients taking metformin. (Am
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 112
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Familial Resemblance in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Response to Statins in the Danish Population
    Corn, Giulia
    Lund, Marie
    Hlatky, Mark A.
    Wohlfahrt, Jan
    Melbye, Mads
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2022, 11 (11):
  • [2] Statins and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels
    Cohen, JS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 115 (01): : 74 - 75
  • [3] The association between age and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response statins
    Corn, Giulia
    Melbye, Mads
    Hlatky, Mark A.
    Wohlfahrt, Jan
    Lund, Marie
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2022, 31 : 390 - 391
  • [4] Metabolic syndrome, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and risk of cardiovascular disease: A population-based study
    Jeppesen, Jorgen
    Hansen, Tine Willum
    Rasmussen, Susanne
    Ibsen, Hans
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    [J]. ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2006, 189 (02) : 369 - 374
  • [5] Statins and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels - Reply
    Frolkis, JP
    Pearce, GL
    Sprecher, DL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 115 (01): : 75 - 76
  • [6] Statins, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and risk of cancer
    Alsheikh-Ali, Alawi A.
    Trikalinos, Thomas A.
    Kent, David M.
    Karas, Richard H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 52 (14) : 1141 - 1147
  • [7] Remnant cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and incident cardiovascular disease among Koreans: a national population-based study
    Lee, Sang Jun
    Kim, Se-Eun
    Go, Tae-Hwa
    Kang, Dae Ryong
    Jeon, Ho-Seong
    Kim, Young-In
    Cho, Dong-Hyuk
    Park, Young Jun
    Lee, Jung-Hee
    Lee, Jun-Won
    Youn, Young-Jin
    Kim, Sang-Hyun
    Kim, Jang Young
    Ahn, Sung Gyun
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 30 (11) : 1142 - 1150
  • [8] Means and ends of statins and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering
    LaRosa, John C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 50 (05) : 419 - 420
  • [9] Association Between Age and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Response to Statins A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study
    Corn, Giulia
    Melbye, Mads
    Hlatky, Mark A.
    Wohlfahrt, Jan
    Lund, Marie
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 176 (08) : 1017 - +
  • [10] A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Statins in Reducing Total Cholesterol and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
    But, Anna
    Suvisaari, Janne
    Suvisaari, Jaana
    Niskanen, Leo
    Haukka, Jari
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2012, 21 : 111 - 112