Sequential-contingent strategy for fallopian tube evaluation using hysterosalpingo foam sonography: a cost analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Armijo-Sanchez, Alberto [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Santamaria-Lopez, Esther [2 ,3 ]
Fernandez-Sanchez, Manuel [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Galiano-Gutierrez, Noelia [2 ,3 ]
Mantrana-Bermejo, Elena [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Valme Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seville, Spain
[2] IVI RMA Seville, Res Dept, Avda Amer Vespucio 19, ES-41092 Seville, Spain
[3] Hlth Res Inst La Fe IIS La Fe, IVI Fdn, Valencia, Spain
[4] Pablo Olavide Univ, Dept Mol Biol & Biochem Engn, Seville, Spain
[5] Sevilla Univ, Dept Surg, Seville, Spain
关键词
Tubal patency; hysterosonosalpingography; hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy); hysterosalpingography (HSG); cost analysis; HYFOSY;
D O I
10.21037/qims-23-816
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Tubal pathology is the etiological factor in 20% of couples with female infertility. Historically, diagnostic evaluation of the fallopian tubes has been performed by means of hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysterosonosalpingography with EXEM (R) foam is a recent technique with supposedly comparable effectiveness to HSG, but with better tolerability for patients. Methods: Tubal patency was assessed in patients who were candidates for intrauterine insemination (IUI) between January 2020 and July 2021. (I) Hysterosonosalpingography with EXEM (R) foam. (II) If the patient had both tubes patent, IUI was proposed. In case of inconclusive or pathological results, HSG was performed. (III) If the HSG concludes tubal patency, IUI is proposed. On the other hand, if it results in tubal obstruction, in vitro fertilization (IVF) is proposed. Results: Assessment of tubal patency by HSG showed concordance with previous Hysterosonosalpingography with EXEM (R) foam results in 45.5% (n=15) of cases of unilateral obstruction and 66.7% (n=6) of cases of bilateral obstruction. When we compare the total cost of HSG (<euro>54,899.46) with the sum of patients who only required Hysterosonosalpingography with EXEM (R) foam together with those who underwent both tests (<euro>45,575.96), it shows that the latter represents a cost benefit strategy (cost difference <euro>9,323.50). Conclusions: Our results suggest a benefit of <euro>9,323.50 when performing the contingent sequential strategy, in case of pathological or inconclusive results, compared to performing a systematic HSG in all patients. Patients with an obstructive hysterosalpingogram with EXEM (R) and a patent hysterosalpingogram will be the subgroup that will benefit the most, as IUI can be proposed instead of IVF. In addition, there is a benefit in terms of optimizing the medical procedure, hospital visits and speeding up the time to start assisted reproductive technology (ART).
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 547
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Pain during Fallopian-tube patency testing by hysterosalpingo-foam sonography
    Van Schoubroeck, D.
    Van den Bosch, T.
    Ameye, L.
    Boes, A. S.
    D'Hooghe, T.
    Timmerman, D.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (03) : 346 - 350
  • [2] Diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam-sonography for fallopian tube patency assessment in infertile women
    Le, M. T.
    Huu, B. Vo
    Pham, A.
    Vu, A.
    Truong, T. T.
    Pham, T. D.
    Ho, T. M.
    Dang, V.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 309 - 309
  • [3] Diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography for assessment of fallopian tube patency in infertile women
    Le, My T.
    Vo, Binh H.
    Le, Hoa P.
    Pham, Anh P.
    Vu, Anh L.
    Pham, Toan D.
    Truong, Tham T.
    Ho, Tuong M.
    Dang, Vinh Q.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2024, 49 (03)
  • [4] Diagnostic Accuracy Study Comparing Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography and Hysterosalpingography for Fallopian Tube Patency Assessment
    Ramos, Julia
    Caligara, Cinzia
    Santamaria-Lopez, Esther
    Gonzalez-Ravina, Cristina
    Prados, Nicolas
    Carranza, Francisco
    Blasco, Victor
    Fernandez-Sanchez, Manuel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (18)
  • [5] First Experience Using 4-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography With SonoVue for Assessing Fallopian Tube Patency
    He, Yanni
    Geng, Qiang
    Liu, Hongmei
    Han, Xiaohua
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (07) : 1233 - 1243
  • [6] Combined Real-Time Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography with B Mode Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography in the Evaluation of Fallopian Tube Patency in Patients Undergoing Infertility Investigations
    Chen, Sumin
    Du, Xiya
    Chen, Qingzi
    Chen, Shaoqi
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 2019
  • [7] Fallopian tube catheterization under 3D vaginal ultrasound guidance followed by highly selective hysterosalpingo-foam sonography: an outpatient procedure
    Melcer, Yaakov
    Pekar-Zlotin, Marina
    Youngster, Michal
    Gat, Itai
    Maymon, Ron
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2024,
  • [8] Is Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography (HyCoSy) Using Sulfur Hexafluoride Microbubbles (SonoVue) Sufficient for the Assessment of Fallopian Tube Patency? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Qu, Enze
    Zhang, Man
    Ju, Jinxiu
    Chen, Ying
    Lin, Xin
    Zhang, Xinling
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [9] Tubal patency assessment using sequential transvaginal ultrasound and hysterosalpingo-foam sonography after methotrexate treatment for tubal pregnancy
    Melcer, Yaakov
    Gat, Itai
    Dvash, Shira
    Copel, Laurian
    Pekar-Zlotin, Marina
    Youngster, Michal
    Maymon, Ron
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 44 (02) : 310 - 315
  • [10] Tubal testing with Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) versus hysterosalpingography (HSG) during the fertility work-up: a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial
    Kamphuis, D.
    Van Eekelen, R.
    Van Welie, N.
    Dreyer, K.
    Van Rijswijk, J.
    Van Hooff, M. H. A.
    De Bruin, J. P.
    Verhoeve, H. R.
    Mol, F.
    Lambalk, C. B.
    Stoker, J. S.
    Van Wely, M.
    Bossuyt, P. M. M.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    Mijatovic, V.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 : I181 - I182