Vectorial Analysis of Deep Plane Face and Neck Lift

被引:1
|
作者
Talei, Benjamin [1 ]
Gould, Dan [1 ]
Ziai, Hedyeh [1 ]
机构
[1] 465 N Roxbury Dr,Suite 750, Beverly Hills, CA 90210 USA
关键词
RHYTIDECTOMY; RELEASE; JAWLINE; MIDFACE; ANGLE;
D O I
10.1093/asj/sjae102
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The vector of aging and consequently the vector of lift in rhytidectomy has aided surgeons in improving movement of tissues during facial rejuvenation procedures. Objectives: The goal was to analyze the vector of lift in patients undergoing primary and revisional facelift to achieve proper vectorial lifting. Methods: Patients undergoing deep-plane facelift surgery were included for analysis. Intraoperative photographs and measurements were taken of the skin, superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), and platysmal suture suspension with mastoid crevasse inset. Measurements were compared between patients who were undergoing primary vs secondary surgery, site of lift, age, and gender. Results: Seventy-one patients (90% female, mean age 57.8) with a total of 142 hemifaces were analyzed, 57 (73%) of which were primary and 14 (27%) secondary facelifts. The average vector of SMAS lifting was 70.8 degrees. Females had a more vertical vector than males (71.3 degrees vs 65.4 degrees; P < .01). The average vectors of platysmal and skin lift were 87.0 degrees and 58.2 degrees, respectively. There was intrapatient difference between hemifaces. Despite there being more intersuture disparity in secondary cases than primary cases (16.9 degrees vs 4.5 degrees; P < .05), the mean vector of lifting was similar between them. Conclusions: Proper release of the deep plane helps determine the appropriate vectors of lift, without relying on guidelines based on population averages. Each patient presents with a unique vector required to correct their descent. This technique provides an optimal result by directly suspending against the vectors of greatest descent.
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1022
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Deep Plane Face and Neck Lift Preface
    Perkins, Stephen W.
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 40 (06) : 679 - 679
  • [2] The deep plane face and neck lift to treat post-radiation lymphedema
    Parikh, Aniruddha C.
    Bickerstaff, Aaron
    Brame, Lacy S.
    Mims, Mark M.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY CASE REPORTS, 2024, 32
  • [3] Transtemporal Endoscopic Deep Plane Face Lift
    Kul, Zekeriya
    Eryilmaz, Erhan
    Ozer, Emre
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2025, 13 (01)
  • [4] Ultrasonic Deep-Plane Neck Lift
    Gentile, Richard D.
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2025, 41 (01) : 54 - 69
  • [5] The Evolution of My Extended SMAS-Biplanar Deep Plane Facelift to a Composite Tissue Deep Plane Face and Neck Lift: Similarities and Differences
    Perkins, Stephen
    Caniglia, Alexander
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 40 (06) : 741 - 749
  • [6] Facial Nerve Considerations for the Deep Plane Facelift and Neck Lift
    Azizzadeh, Babak
    Lu, Richard J.
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 40 (06) : 687 - 693
  • [7] Outcome Analysis in 93 Facial Rejuvenation Patients Treated with a Deep-Plane Face Lift
    Swanson, Eric
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 127 (02) : 823 - 834
  • [8] Short incision, short flap face-lift surgery versus deep plane face-lift surgery
    Coleman, John R., Jr.
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2007, 23 (01) : 45 - 48
  • [9] Anatomic Comparison of the Deep-Plane Face-lift and the Transtemporal Midface-lift
    Jacono, Andrew A.
    Stong, Benjamin Collin
    ARCHIVES OF FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2010, 12 (05) : 339 - 341
  • [10] Deep-Plane Face-lift as an Alternative in the Smoking Patient
    Parikh, Sachin S.
    Jacono, Andrew A.
    ARCHIVES OF FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2011, 13 (04) : 283 - 285