DID PENNSYLVANIA'S STATEWIDE SCHOOL FINANCE REFORM INCREASE EDUCATION SPENDING OR PROVIDE TAX RELIEF?

被引:10
|
作者
Steinberg, Matthew P. [1 ]
Quinn, Rand [1 ]
Kreisman, Daniel [2 ]
Anglum, J. Cameron [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Grad Sch Educ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, Dept Econ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
education finance; state equalization aid; districtpropertytax; education spending; LOCAL-GOVERNMENT RESPONSES; AID; GRANTS; CUTS;
D O I
10.17310/ntj.2016.3.03
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine how local school districts respond to statewide education finance reform. Specifically, we evaluate the impact of Pennsylvania's Act 61, which provided additional state aid to districts spending below state-determined adequacy targets (spending shortfall districts), on district tax effort in support of education. We find that high-tax shortfall districts reduced their property tax rates significantly more than districts without spending shortfalls and, as a consequence, did not increase educational spending compared with their no-shorffall counterparts. Our results suggest that state equalization aid for high-taxing districts with spending shortfalls was used for property tax relief rather than for supplementing education spending.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 582
页数:38
相关论文
共 5 条