The tale of two tails and stock returns for two major emerging markets
被引:0
|
作者:
Sehgal, Sanjay
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Delhi South, Dept Finance & Business Econ, Campus Benito Juarez Rd, New Delhi 110021, IndiaUniv Delhi South, Dept Finance & Business Econ, Campus Benito Juarez Rd, New Delhi 110021, India
Sehgal, Sanjay
[1
]
Agrawal, Tarunika Jain
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Delhi, Fac Management Studies, New Delhi 110007, IndiaUniv Delhi South, Dept Finance & Business Econ, Campus Benito Juarez Rd, New Delhi 110021, India
Agrawal, Tarunika Jain
[2
]
Deisting, Florent
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Toulouse Business Sch, Dept Societal Transit, Paris, FranceUniv Delhi South, Dept Finance & Business Econ, Campus Benito Juarez Rd, New Delhi 110021, India
Deisting, Florent
[3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Delhi South, Dept Finance & Business Econ, Campus Benito Juarez Rd, New Delhi 110021, India
[2] Univ Delhi, Fac Management Studies, New Delhi 110007, India
[3] Toulouse Business Sch, Dept Societal Transit, Paris, France
Tail risk;
Capital gain overhang;
Investor attention and sentiment;
Institutional ownership;
Two-tail strategy;
Firm size;
VALUE-AT-RISK;
CROSS-SECTION;
PROSPECT-THEORY;
INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS;
EXPECTED SHORTFALL;
MEAN REVERSION;
RARE DISASTERS;
VOLATILITY;
DISPOSITION;
LOTTERIES;
D O I:
10.1007/s11156-024-01301-4
中图分类号:
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号:
0202 ;
摘要:
In this study, we examine the relationship between tail measures and stock return for China and India using data from 2000 to 2021. For both the markets, left and right tails exhibit a negative relationship with stock returns and confirm the tail risk puzzle and tail preference, respectively. Tail-based anomalies seem to be a small stock phenomenon, except for the right tail effect in case of India. We find that the two-tail strategy outperforms one-tail strategies for both markets. We confirm that the tail anomaly is primarily a behavioral phenomenon driven by both retail and institutional investors. Market and firm-level sentiments tend to play a more critical role in India than in China. A negative relationship exists between the change in the tail and expected returns for both markets. Contrary to recent research, the change in the tail factor does not explain tail-based returns. Chinese and Indian investors prefer tail risk irrespective of the initial capital state, contrasting with the prospect theory. Investor attention impacts expected returns in both markets, but Indian investors exhibit limited attention bias for both left and right-tail-based information, which is not the case in China. The findings are pertinent for policymakers and global investors.JEL Codes G11, G12, G23, G40.
机构:
School of Business Administration, University of Portland, Portland. OR 97203School of Business Administration, University of Portland, Portland. OR 97203
Adrangi B.
Chatrath A.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, University of NevadaSchool of Business Administration, University of Portland, Portland. OR 97203
Chatrath A.
Raffiee K.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, University of NevadaSchool of Business Administration, University of Portland, Portland. OR 97203