Evaluation of the Urine Drug Abuse Screening Tests

被引:0
|
作者
Akpinar, Kadriye [1 ]
Aksun, Saliha [2 ]
Akpinar, Kemal [3 ]
机构
[1] Burdur State Hosp, Dept Med Biochem, TR-15100 Burdur, Turkiye
[2] Katip Celebi Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Biochem, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Burdur State Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Burdur, Turkiye
关键词
drug abuse testing; immunoassay; LC-MS/MS; TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRY; IMMUNOASSAYS; REACTIVITY; ACCURACY; DEMAND;
D O I
10.7754/Clin.Lab.2023.230812
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Substance use is an important public health problem and increasing all over the world. Different methods have been defined for drug abuse testing in medical laboratories. We aimed to compare two urine drug screening methods with liquid chromatography -tandem mass spectrometry (LCMS/MS). Methods: A total of 102 patients' urine samples were analyzed by test dip card and EMIT (enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique). Randomly selected samples (n = 51; 50%) were also analyzed by LCMS/MS as the reference method. Results: The drug results of all patients analyzed with the test card and EMIT were compatible. Nine of 51 samples (18%) were negative according to all methods. The sensitivity and specificity percentages of AMP, COC, MDMA, OPI/MOP, and THC using test card were 70/96, 100/100, 47/100, 50/100, and 80/85, respectively. Similarly, the sensitivity and specificity percentages of AMP, COC, MDMA, OPI/MOP, and THC using EMIT were 76/97, 100/100, 57/100, 56/100, and 76/91, respectively. Conclusions: The performances of two immunochemical methods were similar for AMP, BZO, COC, MDMA, OPI/MOP, and THC whereas lower than LCMS/MS for AMP, MDMA, OPI/MOP, and THC. A sample that is positive according to any immunochemical method should be confirmed by definitive techniques such as LCMS/MS. (Clin. Lab. 2024;70:533-541. DOI: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2023.230812)
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 541
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Workplace urine screening for drug abuse
    Wright, DS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 1997, 23 (03) : 191 - 191
  • [2] CLINICAL-EVALUATION AND USE OF URINE SCREENING FOR DRUG-ABUSE
    SAXON, AJ
    CALSYN, DA
    HAVER, VM
    DELANEY, CJ
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 149 (03): : 296 - 303
  • [3] Evaluation of a specific oxycodone assay for urine drug of abuse screening.
    Allison, KH
    Black, DA
    Garbin, J
    Bankson, DD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2004, 122 (03) : 457 - 458
  • [4] Comparison of two POC urine drug of abuse tests to a central laboratory screening method
    Kimball, D
    Ghandi, S
    Torke, N
    Chakrin, AL
    Boral, L
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 50 (06) : A168 - A168
  • [5] URINE AND BLOOD DRUG-ABUSE SCREENING
    THOMAS, HG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, 1979, 45 (05): : 435 - 435
  • [6] Adolescents and drug abuse: Clinical use of urine drug screening
    James, WH
    Moore, DD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD & ADOLESCENT SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 1997, 7 (02) : 19 - 36
  • [7] Screening of drug of abuse in urine by LC/MS/MS
    Yong, C. Y.
    Chua, W. T.
    Moy, H. Y.
    Yao, Y. J.
    Lui, C. P.
    [J]. CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2010, 411 (11-12) : 910 - 911
  • [8] Ethical aspects of workplace urine screening for drug abuse
    Forrest, ARW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 1997, 23 (01) : 12 - 17
  • [9] INTERPRETATION OF DRUG-ABUSE SCREENING-TESTS ON URINE FROM PERSONS RECEIVING VARIOUS MEDICATIONS
    FRINGS, CS
    QUEEN, CA
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1972, 18 (07) : 713 - &
  • [10] Pathology Consultation on Urine Compliance Testing and Drug Abuse Screening
    Ward, Michael B.
    Hackenmueller, Sarah A.
    Strathmann, Frederick A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 142 (05) : 586 - 593