Institutional investor heterogeneity and green innovation in China: Does transformation matter? ☆

被引:1
|
作者
Shi, Xuanyi [1 ]
Lin, Yongjia [2 ]
Wang, Yizhi [3 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Macau, Macao, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Jinan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Institutional investor heterogeneity; Green innovation; Digital transformation; DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION; OWNERSHIP; PERFORMANCE; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2024.05.007
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines how different categories of institutional investors influence green innovation for Chinese -listed companies and investigates the impact of digital transformation on this relationship. Results show that pressure -insensitive investors significantly improve corporate green innovation, while pressure -sensitive institutions have no effect. Further evidence suggests this is due to the negative impact of long-term pressure -sensitive investors on green innovation. We further analyze whether digital transformation affects the relationship between institutional ownership heterogeneity and green innovation. Consistent with the view that digital transformation promotes timely information dissemination and alleviates information asymmetry, our findings demonstrate that both pressure -insensitive institutional investors and short-term pressure -sensitive institutional investors promote green innovation in firms with higher levels of digital transformation. Further analyses reveal that digital transformation at the city level amplifies the influence of institutional investors on green innovation, and the underlying technology architecture provides more value to the institutional ownership heterogeneity - green innovation nexus.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 1014
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How does institutional investor preference influence corporate green innovation in China?
    Chen, Zhongfei
    Zuo, Wenbin
    Xie, Guanxia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2024, 30 (11): : 1239 - 1269
  • [2] Does Investor Sentiment Drive Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from China
    Dong, Li
    Zhang, Xin
    Chen, Jinlong
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [3] Institutional investor networks and firm innovation: Evidence from China
    Fan, Yaoyao
    Ly, Kim Cuong
    Jiang, Yuxiang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 89
  • [4] ESG performance and green innovation in new energy enterprises: Does institutional environment matter?
    Wang, Miao
    Wang, Yiduo
    Wen, Shouxun
    [J]. RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2024, 71
  • [5] Institutional investor distraction and innovation
    Pu, Xiaoling
    Tsai, Hua-Hsin
    Via, M. Tony
    [J]. EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 29 (01) : 349 - 386
  • [6] Institutional investor heterogeneity and systemic financial risk: Evidence from China
    Huang, Wenli
    Zhu, Yuanhao
    Li, Shi
    Xu, Yueling
    [J]. RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2024, 68
  • [7] Does digital transformation promote the green innovation of China's listed companies?
    Liang, Peng
    Sun, Xinhui
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (09) : 22199 - 22235
  • [8] Does digital transformation matter to green innovation: based on TOE framework and configuration perspective
    Weili Yin
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 100046 - 100057
  • [9] Does digital transformation matter to green innovation: based on TOE framework and configuration perspective
    Yin, Weili
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (44) : 100046 - 100057
  • [10] Does gender diversity matter for green innovation?
    He, Xiaoping
    Jiang, Shuo
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 28 (07) : 1341 - 1356