Carbon emission prediction models: A review

被引:24
|
作者
Jin, Yukai [1 ,2 ]
Sharifi, Ayyoob [3 ,4 ]
Li, Zhisheng [2 ]
Chen, Sirui [2 ]
Zeng, Suzhen [2 ,5 ]
Zhao, Shanlun [2 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Innovat & Practice Smart Soc, Urban Environm Sci Lab URBES, Higashi, Hiroshima 7398529, Japan
[2] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Civil & Transportat Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Hiroshima Univ, IDEC Inst, Higashi, Hiroshima 7398529, Japan
[4] Lebanese Amer Univ, Sch Architecture & Design, Beirut, Lebanon
[5] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Ocean Engn & Technol, Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon emission; Climate change mitigation; Prediction model; Machine learning; Neural network; Artificial intelligence; EXTREME LEARNING-MACHINE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; TERM WIND-SPEED; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROPAGATION NEURAL-NETWORK; CO2; EMISSIONS; DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; HYBRID MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172319
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Amidst growing concerns over the greenhouse effect, especially its consequential impacts, establishing effective Carbon Emission Prediction Models (CEPMs) to comprehend and predict CO 2 emission trends is imperative for climate change mitigation. A review of 147 Carbon Emission Prediction Model (CEPM) studies revealed three predominant functions -prediction, optimization, and prediction factor selection. Statistical models, comprising 75 instances, were the most prevalent among prediction models, followed by neural network models at 21.8 %. The consistent rise in neural network model usage, particularly feedforward architectures, was observed from 2019 to 2022. A majority of CEPMs incorporated optimized approaches, with 94.4 % utilizing metaheuristic models. Parameter optimization was the primary focus, followed by structure optimization. Prediction factor selection models, employing Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for statistical and machine learning models, respectively, filtered factors effectively. Scrutinizing accuracy, preoptimized CEPMs exhibited varied performance, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values spanned from 0.112 to 1635 Mt, while post -optimization led to a notable improvement, the minimum RMSE reached 0.0003 Mt, and the maximum was 95.14 Mt. Finally, we summarized the pros and cons of existing models, classified and counted the factors that influence carbon emissions, clarified the research objectives in CEPM and assessed the applied model evaluation methods and the spatial and temporal scales of existing research.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Review of Building Carbon Emission Accounting and Prediction Models
    Gao, Huan
    Wang, Xinke
    Wu, Kang
    Zheng, Yarong
    Wang, Qize
    Shi, Wei
    He, Meng
    BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (07)
  • [2] A Review of Macroscopic Carbon Emission Prediction Model Based on Machine Learning
    Zhao, Yuhong
    Liu, Ruirui
    Liu, Zhansheng
    Liu, Liang
    Wang, Jingjing
    Liu, Wenxiang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [3] Application of Neural Networks on Carbon Emission Prediction: A Systematic Review and Comparison
    Feng, Wentao
    Chen, Tailong
    Li, Longsheng
    Zhang, Le
    Deng, Bingyan
    Liu, Wei
    Li, Jian
    Cai, Dongsheng
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (07)
  • [4] Carbon Dioxide Emission Forecast: A Review of Existing Models and Future Challenges
    Tian, Yaxin
    Ren, Xiang
    Li, Keke
    Li, Xiangqian
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (04)
  • [5] Analysis of carbon emission characteristics and establishment of prediction models for residential and office buildings in China
    Luo, Xiaoyu
    Zhang, Yantong
    Song, Zhiqian
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 267
  • [6] Methane emission models–a review
    Rafey A.
    Siddiqui F.Z.
    Int. J. Environ. Stud., 2022, 6 (1015-1034): : 1015 - 1034
  • [7] Low-carbon development in power systems based on carbon emission analysis models: A comprehensive review
    Ding, Ning
    Guo, Pengtao
    Xi, YanHeng
    Zhang, Anan
    Lei, Xianzhang
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2024, 65
  • [8] Analysis and prediction models for tyre noise emission
    Guisset, P
    Meulewaeter, L
    Augusztinovicz, F
    Marki, F
    Gelosa, E
    VEHICLE NOISE AND VIBRATION 2000, 2000, 2000 (01): : 361 - 368
  • [9] A study on the carbon emission futures price prediction
    Kumar, Niteesh
    Kayal, Parthajit
    Maiti, Moinak
    Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 483
  • [10] Which model is more efficient in carbon emission prediction research? A comparative study of deep learning models, machine learning models, and econometric models
    Xiao Yao
    Hong Zhang
    Xiyue Wang
    Yadong Jiang
    Yuxi Zhang
    Xiaohong Na
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 19500 - 19515