Life cycle cost assessment of geothermal energy assisted hydrogen liquefaction for sustainable and renewable energy applications: Case study and adaptation for Afyon geothermal power plant

被引:2
|
作者
Yilmaz, Ceyhun [1 ]
Korkmaz, Suleyman Aykut [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Afyon Kocatepe Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Afyon, Turkiye
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Dept Marine Engn, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Univ Southampton, Maritime Engn, Southampton, England
关键词
Geothermal energy; Hydrogen liquefaction; Life cycle cost analysis; Performance analysis; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; ECONOMY; EXERGY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.417
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study presents a comprehensive Life Cycle Cost Assessment (LCCA) of geothermal-assisted hydrogen liquefaction, explicitly focusing on the Afyon Geothermal Power Plant (AGPP) as a case study. The study evaluates the economic viability and sustainability of integrating geothermal energy into hydrogen liquefaction. The results of the LCCA contribute to the ongoing discourse on sustainable energy solutions, offering a nuanced understanding of the economic considerations associated with geothermal-assisted hydrogen liquefaction. The study serves as a model for assessing the economic feasibility of similar systems, fostering informed decisionmaking in the pursuit of cleaner and more economically sustainable energy pathways. This study has conducted a technical and economic investigation of liquid hydrogen production using geothermal heat and electricity effects. Geothermal water pre-cools the hydrogen by providing heat to the absorption system. Then, the electricity generated in the geothermal plant is used to work in the liquefaction cycle. The generated electricity is used to liquefy hydrogen in the liquefaction cycle. The capacity of the electricity generated from the AGPP produced here is 2621 kW. The proposed system can be achieved by pre-cooling unit H2 up to -30 degrees C at 120 degrees C and 150 kg/s geothermal source. In the liquefaction cycle, 0.84 kg/s H2 can be liquefied. As a result, the total energy efficiency of the proposed system can be calculated as 32.4% and exergy efficiency as 15.4%. The system's net present value (NPV) was calculated as 65,320,000 $. When life cycle cost analysis was performed using the levelized annual cost (LAC) method, the project's levelized cost was calculated as 7,673,000 $/yr. The unit cost of the liquid hydrogen produced is 1.252 $/kg. This system's discounted payback period (Ndpp) is calculated as 3.48.
引用
收藏
页码:772 / 788
页数:17
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Optimum energy evaluation and life cycle cost assessment of a hydrogen liquefaction system assisted by geothermal energy
    Yilmaz, Ceyhun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (05) : 3558 - 3568
  • [2] Life cycle cost assessment of a geothermal power assisted hydrogen energy system
    Yilmaz, Ceyhun
    GEOTHERMICS, 2020, 83
  • [3] Life Cycle Analysis of a Geothermal Power Plant: Comparison of the Environmental Performance with Other Renewable Energy Systems
    Basosi, Riccardo
    Bonciani, Roberto
    Frosali, Dario
    Manfrida, Giampaolo
    Parisi, Maria Laura
    Sansone, Franco
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (07) : 1 - 29
  • [4] Examination and thermodynamic modelling of a geothermal energy power plant for sustainable development: a case study
    Akbay, Oguzhan
    Yilmaz, Fatih
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2022, 38 (04) : 398 - 410
  • [5] Energy Optimization Modeling of Geothermal Power Plant ( Case Study: Darajat Geothermal Field Unit III
    Sinaga, R. H. M.
    Darmanto, P. S.
    5th ITB International Geothermal Workshop (IIGW2016), 2016, 42
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of geothermal power plants: A comparison with other energy conversion technologies
    Zuffi, C.
    Manfrida, G.
    Asdrubali, F.
    Talluri, L.
    GEOTHERMICS, 2022, 104
  • [7] Sustainable design of geothermal energy systems for electric power generation using life cycle optimization
    Tian, Xueyu
    Meyer, Taylor
    Lee, Hannah
    You, Fengqi
    AICHE JOURNAL, 2020, 66 (04)
  • [8] Energy and exergy analysis of dry-steam geothermal power plant: Case study in kamojang geothermal power plant unit 2
    Setyawan, Nova Dany
    Pambudi, Nugroho Agung
    Utomo, Frandhoni
    Saputro, Herman
    Adiprana, Reza
    Saw, Lip Huat
    Gurturk, Mert
    Rudiyanto, Bayu
    3RD ANNUAL APPLIED SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (AASEC 2018), 2018, 197
  • [9] The environmental impact of renewable energy technologies shown in case of ORC-Based Geothermal Power Plant
    Matuszewska, D.
    Kuta, M.
    Gorski, J.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE SUSTAINABLE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 214
  • [10] A case study: Exergoeconomic analysis and genetic algorithm optimization of performance of a hydrogen liquefaction cycle assisted by geothermal absorption precooling cycle
    Yilmaz, Ceyhun
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 128 : 68 - 80