On the Exploration of Local Significant Differences For Two-Sample Test

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Zhi-Jian [1 ]
Ni, Jie
Yao, Jia-He
Gao, Wei
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Natl Key Lab Novel Software Technol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
ALTERNATIVES; TREES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Recent years have witnessed increasing attentions on two-sample test with diverse real applications, while this work takes one more step on the exploration of local significant differences for two-sample test. We propose the MEMaBiD, an effective test for two-sample testing, and the basic idea is to exploit local information by multiple Mahalanobis kernels and introduce bi-directional hypothesis for testing. On the exploration of local significant differences, we first partition the embedding space into several rectangle regions via a new splitting criterion, which is relevant to test power and data correlation. We then explore local significant differences based on our bi-directional masked p-value together with the MEMaBiD test. Theoretically, we present the asymptotic distribution and lower bounds of test power for our MEMaBiD test, and control the familywise error rate on the exploration of local significant differences. We finally conduct extensive experiments to validate the effectiveness of our proposed methods on two-sample test and the exploration of local significant differences.
引用
收藏
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Local significant differences from nonparametric two-sample tests
    Tarn Duong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICS, 2013, 25 (03) : 635 - 645
  • [2] A TWO-SAMPLE TEST
    Moses, Lincoln E.
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1952, 17 (03) : 239 - 247
  • [3] A Kernel Two-Sample Test
    Gretton, Arthur
    Borgwardt, Karsten M.
    Rasch, Malte J.
    Schoelkopf, Bernhard
    Smola, Alexander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2012, 13 : 723 - 773
  • [4] A Witness Two-Sample Test
    Kuebler, Jonas M.
    Jitkrittum, Wittawat
    Schoelkopf, Bernhard
    Muandet, Krikamol
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 151, 2022, 151
  • [5] AutoML Two-Sample Test
    Kuebler, Jonas M.
    Stimper, Vincent
    Buchholz, Simon
    Muandet, Krikamol
    Schoelkopf, Bernhard
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 35, NEURIPS 2022, 2022,
  • [6] On two-sample McNemar test
    Xiang, Jim X.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2016, 26 (02) : 217 - 226
  • [7] Manifold energy two-sample test
    Chu, Lynna
    Dai, Xiongtao
    [J]. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2024, 18 (01): : 145 - 166
  • [8] On a new multivariate two-sample test
    Baringhaus, L
    Franz, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 2004, 88 (01) : 190 - 206
  • [9] Revisiting the two-sample runs test
    Baringhaus, Ludwig
    Henze, Norbert
    [J]. TEST, 2016, 25 (03) : 432 - 448
  • [10] The Bayesian two-sample t test
    Gönen, M
    Johnson, WO
    Lu, YG
    Westfall, PH
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2005, 59 (03): : 252 - 257