Formative qualitative evaluation of an improvement programme delivered in an English hospital trust to reduce harm from pressure ulcers

被引:0
|
作者
Dallow, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Goldthorpe, Katharine [2 ,3 ]
Murphy, Peter [4 ]
Phipps, Denham [5 ]
Rostami, Paryaneh [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Blackpool Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Blackpool, England
[2] Blackpool Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, QI Hub, Blackpool, England
[3] Univ Cent Lancashire, Fac Clin & Biomed Sci, Sch Med, Preston, England
[4] East Lancashire Hosp NHS Trust, Trust HQ, Haslingden Rd, Blackburn, England
[5] Univ Manchester, Sch Hlth Sci, Ctr Pharmacoepidemiol & Drug Safety, Div Pharm & Optometry,Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester, England
[6] Sheffield Hlth & Social Care NHS Fdn Trust, Qual Directorate, Sheffield, England
关键词
Nurses; Pressure Ulcer; Quality improvement;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002532
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Pressure ulcers (PUs) are a leading cause of preventable harm globally and can cause patients significant pain, infection and, in rare incidents, death. There is a strong evidence base for how to improve PUs and one UK healthcare trust used this evidence to develop a quality improvement (QI) programme using the Institute of Healthcare Improvement's Breakthrough Series collaborative model. 20 teams, from both acute and community settings, participated in the first two phases of the collaborative. The delivery of both phases used virtual delivery using the Institute of Healthcare Improvement's improvement model. This study sought to formatively evaluate the early phases of the collaborative, to support learning and continual improvements to the collaborative programme and other collaboratives delivered by the organisation based on the formative evaluation.Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively sampled participants to explore their perspectives about the implementation of the programme, interventions tested as part of the 'change package' provided and the pandemic's impact.Results A total of seven participants were interviewed, including acute ward managers, a charge nurse (deputy ward manager), a wound healing community nurse and a team leader community nurse. Interview durations varied from 9 min to 28 min. The interviews were kept short and stopped when data saturation was achieved as it was an extremely pressurised time for the organisation where the highest escalation alert was triggered on numerous occasions.Conclusion A sustained reduction in PUs was achieved during the evaluation period and participants felt that the approach helped to achieve this, regardless of the adaptations made to the delivery method due to the pandemic. To support improvements, it is vital to ensure systems such as data collection are accurate and timely. The necessity for building strong foundations for QI capability must not be underestimated, as greater QI knowledge leads to better engagement and outcomes.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] A quality improvement programme to reduce hospital-acquired pressure injuries
    Gupta, Poonam
    Shiju, Shiny
    Chacko, Gracy
    Thomas, Mincy
    Abas, Asma
    Savarimuthu, Indirani
    Omari, Emad
    Al-Balushi, Sara
    Jessymol, Pulikana
    Mathew, Sunitha
    Quinto, Marife
    McDonald, Ian
    Andrews, William
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2020, 9 (03)
  • [2] A qualitative formative evaluation of a patient-centred patient safety intervention delivered in collaboration with hospital volunteers
    Louch, Gemma
    O'Hara, Jane
    Mohammed, Mohammed A.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (05) : 1143 - 1153
  • [3] Driving digital health transformation in hospitals: a formative qualitative evaluation of the English Global Digital Exemplar programme
    Krasuska, Marta
    Williams, Robin
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Franklin, Bryony
    Hinder, Susan
    TheNguyen, Hung
    Lane, Wendy
    Mozaffar, Hajar
    Mason, Kathy
    Eason, Sally
    Potts, Henry
    Cresswell, Kathrin
    BMJ HEALTH & CARE INFORMATICS, 2021, 28 (01)
  • [4] Formative independent evaluation of a digital change programme in the English National Health Service: study protocol for a longitudinal qualitative study
    Cresswell, Kathrin
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Dean Franklin, Bryony
    Krasuska, Marta
    Nguyen, Hung
    Hinder, Susan
    Lane, Wendy
    Mozaffar, Hajar
    Mason, Kathy
    Eason, Sally
    Potts, Henry
    Williams, Robin
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [5] A Clinical Nurse Specialist-Led Interprofessional Quality Improvement Project to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers
    Fabbruzzo-Cota, Christina
    Frecea, Monica
    Kozell, Kathryn
    Pere, Katalin
    Thompson, Tamara
    Thomas, Julie Tjan
    Wong, Angela
    CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALIST, 2016, 30 (02) : 110 - 116
  • [6] Using programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) to set priorities: Reflections from a qualitative assessment in an English Primary Care Trust
    Goodwin, Elizabeth
    Frew, Emma J.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2013, 98 : 162 - 168
  • [7] A qualitative formative evaluation of a patient facing intervention to improve care transitions for older people moving from hospital to home
    Shannon, Rosie
    Baxter, Ruth
    Hardicre, Natasha
    Mills, Thomas
    Murray, Jenni
    Lawton, Rebecca
    O'Hara, Jane K.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2022, 25 (06) : 2796 - 2806
  • [8] Evaluation of a Video-Assisted Patient Education Program to Reduce Blood Pressure Delivered Through the Electronic Medical Record: Results of a Quality Improvement Project
    Miller, Edgar R., III
    Alzahrani, Haitham A.
    Bregaglio, Daniel S.
    Christensen, Jon K.
    Palmer, Sarah L.
    Alsharif, Fawaz H.
    Matroud, Ashwaq S.
    Kanaani, Kanaan A.
    Sunbul, Tamara J.
    D'almeida, Jasintha
    Morrissey, Sinead
    Crockford, Margaret
    Rajanayagam, Selva N.
    Sarhan, Ahlam A.
    Azmi, Wafa H.
    Miller, Anna R.
    Vrany, Elizabeth A.
    Al Natour, Shahed
    Dalcin, Arlene T.
    Ghamdi, Mohammed J.
    Appel, Lawrence J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2021, 34 (12) : 1328 - 1335
  • [9] Evaluation of the introduction of QOF quality improvement modules in English general practice: early findings from a rapid, qualitative exploration of implementation
    Bramwell, Donna
    Hotham, Sarah
    Peckham, Stephen
    Checkland, Kath
    Forbes, Lindsay J. L.
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2022, 11 (03)
  • [10] From purists to pragmatists: a qualitative evaluation of how implementation processes and contexts shaped the uptake and methodological adaptations of a maternal and neonatal quality improvement programme in South Africa prior to, and during COVID-19
    Odendaal, Willem
    Chetty, Terusha
    Goga, Ameena
    Tomlinson, Mark
    Singh, Yages
    Marshall, Carol
    Kauchali, Shuaib
    Pillay, Yogan
    Makua, Manala
    Hunt, Xanthe
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)