The role of germline BRCA1 & BRCA2 mutations in familial pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Limijadi, Edward Kurnia Setiawan [1 ,2 ]
Muniroh, Muflihatul [3 ]
Prajoko, Yan Wisnu [4 ,5 ]
Tjandra, Kevin Christian [5 ,6 ]
Respati, Danendra Rakha Putra [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Diponegoro, Doctoral Study Program Med & Hlth Sci, Semarang, Indonesia
[2] Univ Diopnegoro, Fac Med, Dept Clin Pathol, Semarang, Indonesia
[3] Univ Diponegoro, Fac Med, Dept Physiol, Semarang, Indonesia
[4] Univ Diponegoro, Fac Med, Dept Surg Oncol, Semarang, Indonesia
[5] Kariadi Gen Hosp, Semarang, Indonesia
[6] Diponegoro Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med, Semarang, Indonesia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词
RISK; PREVALENCE; INHIBITOR; DELETION; CARRIERS; GENES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0299276
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FPC) presents a notable risk, with 3-10% of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases having a family history. Studies link FPC to syndromes like HBOC, suggesting BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations play a role. BRCA gene functions in DNA repair impact FPC management, influencing sensitivity to therapies like PARP inhibitors. Identifying mutations not only aids FPC treatment but also reveals broader cancer risks. However, challenges persist in selectively applying genetic testing due to cost constraints. This Systematic Review focuses on BRCA1/BRCA2 significance in FPC, diagnostic criteria, prognostic value, and limitations.Method Original articles published from 2013 to January 2023 were sourced from databases such as Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect. Inclusion criteria comprised observational cohort or diagnostic studies related to the role of BRCA1/2 mutation in correlation to familial pancreatic cancer (FPC), while article reviews, narrative reviews, and non-relevant content were excluded. The assessment of bias used ROBINS-I, and the results were organized using PICOS criteria in a Google spreadsheet table. The systematic review adhered to the PRISMA 2020 checklist.Result We analyzed 9 diagnostic studies encompassing 1325 families and 4267 patients from Italy, USA, and Poland. Despite the limitation of limited homogenous PICO studies, our findings effectively present evidence. BRCA1/2 demonstrates benefits in detecting first-degree relatives FPC involvement with 2.26-10 times higher risk. These mutation findings also play an important role since with the BRCA1/2 targeted therapy, Poly-ADP Ribose Polymerase inhibitors (PARP) may give better outcomes of FPC treatment. Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 administration's impact on odds ratio (OR) based on six and five studies respectively. BRCA1 exhibited non-significant effects (OR = 1.26, P = 0.51), while BRCA2 showed significance (OR = 1.68, P = 0.04). No heterogeneity observed, indicating consistent results. Further research on BRCA1 is warranted.Conclusion Detecting the BRCA1/2 mutation gene offers numerous advantages, particularly in its correlation with FPC. For diagnostic and prognostic purposes, testing is strongly recommended for first-degree relatives, who face a significantly higher risk (2.26-10 times) of being affected. Additionally, FPC patients with identified BRCA1/2 mutations exhibit a more favorable prognosis compared to the non-mutated population. This is attributed to the availability of targeted BRCA1/2 therapy, which maximizes treatment outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Frequency of Germline and Somatic BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Prostate Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Valsecchi, Anna Amela
    Dionisio, Rossana
    Panepinto, Olimpia
    Paparo, Jessica
    Palicelli, Andrea
    Vignani, Francesca
    Di Maio, Massimo
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [2] Role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in pancreatic cancer
    Greer, Julia B.
    Whitcomb, David C.
    GUT, 2007, 56 (05) : 601 - 605
  • [3] BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutations and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Oh, Mok
    McBride, Ali
    Yun, Seongseok
    Bhattacharjee, Sandipan
    Slack, Marion
    Martin, Jennifer R.
    Jeter, Joanne
    Abraham, Ivo
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2018, 110 (11):
  • [4] Common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer families: a meta-analysis from systematic review
    Wang, Furu
    Fang, Qiaoqiao
    Ge, Zhen
    Yu, Ningle
    Xu, Sanxiao
    Fan, Xiangyong
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 39 (03) : 2109 - 2118
  • [5] RE: BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutations and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Katona, Bryson W.
    Stadler, Zsofia K.
    Robson, Mark E.
    Domchek, Susan M.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2019, 111 (05): : 522 - 523
  • [6] RE: BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutations and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Haiyan
    Shi, Li
    Wang, Ying
    Duan, Guangcai
    Wang, Yadong
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2020, 112 (04): : 426 - 427
  • [7] Common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer families: a meta-analysis from systematic review
    Furu Wang
    Qiaoqiao Fang
    Zhen Ge
    Ningle Yu
    Sanxiao Xu
    Xiangyong Fan
    Molecular Biology Reports, 2012, 39 : 2109 - 2118
  • [8] RE: BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutations and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Response
    Oh, Mok
    McBride, Ali
    Yun, Seongseok
    Bhattacharjee, Sandipan
    Slack, Marion
    Martin, Jennifer R.
    Jeter, Joanne
    Abraham, Ivo
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2020, 112 (04): : 428 - 428
  • [9] BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutations and Lung Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis
    Lee, Yen-Chien
    Lee, Yang-Cheng
    Li, Chung-Yi
    Lee, Yen-Ling
    Chen, Bae-Ling
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2020, 56 (05):
  • [10] BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and colorectal cancer risk: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Oh, Mok
    McBride, Ali
    Yun, Seongseok
    Bhattacharjee, Sandipan
    Slack, Marion
    Jeter, Joanne M.
    Abraham, Ivo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (04)