Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Large-for-Gestational-Age Infants in Mothers With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

被引:0
|
作者
Kang, Mei [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Chengguang [3 ]
Lai, Mengyu [4 ]
Weng, Jianrong [5 ]
Zhuang, Yan [5 ]
He, Huichen [1 ]
Qiu, Yan [1 ]
Wu, Yixia [1 ]
Qi, Zhangxuan [6 ]
Zhang, Weixia [3 ]
Xu, Xianming [5 ]
Zhu, Yanhong [1 ]
Wang, Yufan [4 ]
Yang, Xiaokang [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Gen Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Sch Med, 100 Haining Rd, Shanghai 200080, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Inst Infect Dis & Biosecur, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, AI Inst, MoE Key Lab Artificial Intelligence, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Shanghai Gen Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, 100 Haining Rd, Shanghai 200080, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, 100 Haining Rd, Shanghai 200080, Peoples R China
[6] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Gen Hosp, Ctr Med Artificial Intelligence & Engn, Sch Med, Shanghai 200080, Peoples R China
关键词
gestational diabetes mellitus; continuous glucose monitoring; glycemic profile; large-for-gestational age; machine learning; prediction model; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; PREGNANCY; HYPERGLYCEMIA; OUTCOMES; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1210/clinem/dgae475
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Large-for-gestational-age (LGA), one of the most common complications of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), has become a global concern. The predictive performance of common continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics for LGA is limited.Objective We aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model to determine the probability of women with GDM giving birth to LGA infants during pregnancy using CGM measurements together with demographic data and metabolic indicators.Methods A total of 371 women with GDM from a prospective cohort at a university hospital were included. CGM was performed during 20 to 34 gestational weeks, and glycemic fluctuations were evaluated and visualized in women with GDM who gave birth to LGA and non-LGA infants. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-based fusion model was developed to predict LGA. Comparisons among the novel fusion model and 3 conventional models were made using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC) and accuracy.Results Overall, 76 (20.5%) out of 371 GDM women developed LGA neonates. The visualized 24-hour glucose profiles differed at midmorning. This difference was consistent among subgroups categorized by pregestational body mass index, therapeutic protocol, and CGM administration period. The AI-based fusion prediction model using 24-hour CGM data and 15 clinical variables for LGA prediction (AUCROC 0.852; 95% CI, 0.680-0.966; accuracy 84.4%) showed superior discriminative power compared with the 3 classic models.Conclusion We demonstrated better performance in predicting LGA infants among women with GDM using the AI-based fusion model. The characteristics of the CGM profiles allowed us to determine the appropriate window for intervention.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Large-for-Gestational-Age Infants across the United States from 2012 to 2018
    Hernandez-Zepeda, Miriam L.
    Garg, Bharti
    Valent, Amy M.
    [J]. DIABETES, 2022, 71
  • [2] Developing and validating a predictive model of delivering large-for-gestational-age infants among women with gestational diabetes mellitus
    Zhu, Yi-Tian
    Xiang, Lan-Lan
    Chen, Ya-Jun
    Zhong, Tian-Ying
    Wang, Jun-Jun
    Zeng, Yu
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2024, 15 (06)
  • [3] Growth patterns of large-for-gestational-age and appropriate-for-gestational-age infants of gestational diabetic mothers and control mothers at age 1 year
    Vohr, BR
    McGarvey, ST
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1997, 20 (07) : 1066 - 1072
  • [4] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LARGE-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS AND GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN WOMEN WITH GESTATIONAL DIABETES
    LANGER, O
    MAZZE, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 159 (06) : 1478 - 1483
  • [5] Preeclampsia and the risk of large-for-gestational-age infants
    Powe, Camille E.
    Ecker, Jeffrey
    Rana, Sarosh
    Wang, Alice
    Ankers, Elizabeth
    Ye, Jun
    Levine, Richard J.
    Karumanchi, Ananth
    Thadhani, Ravi
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 (05) : 425.e1 - 425.e6
  • [6] Is there a residual risk of large-for-gestational-age infant related to gestational diabetes mellitus when it is treated?
    Cosson, Emmanuel
    Vicaut, Eric
    Tatulashvili, Sopio
    Portal, Jean -Jacques
    Nachtergaele, Charlotte
    Sal, Meriem
    Berkane, Narimane
    Pinto, Sara
    Rezgani, Amel
    Carbillon, Lionel
    Bihana, Helene
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2022, 48 (05)
  • [7] Delivery outcomes of large-for-gestational-age newborns stratified by the presence or absence of gestational diabetes mellitus
    Rosen, Hadar
    Shmueli, Anat
    Ashwal, Eran
    Hiersch, Liran
    Yogev, Yariv
    Aviram, Amir
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 141 (01) : 120 - 125
  • [8] Large-for-gestational-age as a marker for adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancy complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus
    Davitt, Caroline C.
    Packer, Claire H.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S525 - S526
  • [9] Large-for-Gestational-Age Ultrasound Diagnosis and Risk for Cesarean Delivery in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
    Scifres, Christina M.
    Feghali, Maisa
    Dumont, Tina
    Althouse, Andrew D.
    Speer, Paul
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Catov, Janet M.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (05): : 978 - 986
  • [10] TOTAL GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN IN MOTHERS OF LARGE-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS - A POSTPARTUM TEST FOR UNDETECTED MATERNAL DIABETES
    POLLAK, A
    BREHM, R
    HAVELEC, L
    LUBEC, G
    MALAMITSIPUCHNER, A
    SIMBRUNNER, G
    WIDNESS, JA
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF THE NEONATE, 1981, 40 (3-4): : 129 - 135