An experimental study on airborne transmission in a meeting room with different air distribution methods

被引:2
|
作者
Zhao, Weixin [1 ]
Lestinen, Sami [2 ]
Guo, Miao [3 ]
Kilpelainen, Simo [1 ]
Jokisalo, Juha [1 ]
Kosonen, Risto [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Espoo, Finland
[2] A Insinoorit Suunnittelu Oy, Espoo, Finland
[3] Chongqing Univ, Joint Int Res Lab Green Bldg & Built Environm, Minist Educ, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Urban Construct, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Airborne transmission; Infection probability; air distribution; Heat gain; Meeting room; Tracer gas; PERSONAL EXPOSURE; VENTILATION; INFECTION; PARTICLES; OCCUPANTS; TRACER;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111522
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Aerosols are one of the major sources of cross-infection. The main purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of heat gain, airflow rate, air distribution, and the location of an infector on the airborne transmission and infection probability in a meeting room. In a six -person meeting room the droplet nuclei of an infected person were simulated with tracer gas (SF 6 ) generated by a thermal breathing manikin. An overhead perforated duct (OPD) and low velocity unit (LVU) were used and their performance was compared. With OPD, the average contaminant removal efficiency in the breathing zone was quite uniformly between 0.9 and 1.1. With LVU, the average contaminant removal efficiency varied greatly between 0.2 and 10.1. The airborne generation was assumed to be 5 quantum/h by an infected person. The infection probability for every exposed person was found to be quite uniform with OPD, 1.4 % with a heat gain and air flow rate of 38 W/m 2 and 61 l/s and 0.9 % with a heat gain and air flow rate of 60 W/m 2 and 116 l/s after 3 hours ' exposure. However, variation of the infection probability with LVU was significant and the highest risk reached 4 %. The infection probability was lower if the exposed person was farther from the infector, or in the case of OPD if the infector was near the exhaust. With LVU, the infection probability depended on the airflow rate and the relative distance between the supply unit and the exposed person.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Experimental and CFD study of air distribution system and airflow rate impact on airborne transmission
    Omerzo, Borut
    Zakula, Tea
    Glicksman, Leon R.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 271
  • [2] Airborne transmission of exhaled droplet nuclei between occupants in a room with horizontal air distribution
    Ai, Z. T.
    Huang, T.
    Melikov, A. K.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 163
  • [3] Experimental analysis of airborne contaminant distribution in an operating room with different ventilation schemes
    Schumann, Lukas
    Lange, Julia
    Cetin, Yunus Emre
    Kriegel, Martin
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 244
  • [4] Experimental study on thermal environment in a simulated classroom with different air distribution methods
    Zhao, Weixin
    Lestinen, Sami
    Mustakallio, Panu
    Kilpelainen, Simo
    Jokisalo, Juha
    Kosonen, Risto
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 43
  • [5] Experimental and CFD study of air distribution system and airflow rate impact on airborne transmission (vol 271, 112588, 2025)
    Omerzo, Borut
    Zakula, Tea
    Glicksman, Leon R.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 277
  • [6] Experimental Study of Air Distribution and Ventilation Effectiveness in a Room with a Combination of Different Mechanical Ventilation and Heating/Cooling Systems
    Olesen, Bjarne W.
    Simone, Angela
    Krajcik, Michal
    Causone, Francesco
    De Carli, Michele
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VENTILATION, 2011, 9 (04) : 371 - 383
  • [7] Design methods of air distribution in an underfloor air conditioned room
    Lian, ZW
    Wang, HY
    CRYOGENICS AND REFRIGERATION - PROCEEDINGS OF ICCR'2003, 2003, : 587 - 590
  • [8] The effect of temperature differences on the distribution of an airborne contaminant in an experimental room
    Lee, Eungyoung
    Feigley, Charles E.
    Khan, Jamil A.
    Hussey, James R.
    ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2006, 50 (05): : 527 - 537
  • [9] Experimental study of different control methods for hypersonic air inlets
    F. Falempin
    M. A. Goldfeld
    Yu. V. Semenova
    A. V. Starov
    K. Yu. Timofeev
    Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 2008, 15
  • [10] Experimental study of different control methods for hypersonic air inlets
    Falempin, F.
    Goldfeld, M. A.
    Semenova, Yu. V.
    Starov, A. V.
    Timofeev, K. Yu.
    THERMOPHYSICS AND AEROMECHANICS, 2008, 15 (01) : 1 - 9