Study on the Relationship between Port Governance and Terminal Operation System for Smart Port: Japan Case

被引:1
|
作者
Inutsuka, Hideyo [1 ]
Ichimura, Kinya [2 ]
Sugimura, Yoshihisa [3 ]
Yoshie, Muneo [1 ]
Shinoda, Takeshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Port & Airport Res Inst, Infrastruct DX Engn Dept, Yokosuka 2390826, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Fac Engn, Fukuoka 8190395, Japan
[3] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Maritime Sci, Kobe 6580022, Japan
来源
LOGISTICS-BASEL | 2024年 / 8卷 / 02期
关键词
port; terminal operation system; smart port; port management; CONTAINER STACKING; MANAGEMENT; CHINA;
D O I
10.3390/logistics8020059
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Background: To improve port productivity, safety, and sustainability, the use of information and communication technology is being promoted as a smart port. The utilization of a terminal operation system (TOS) is important for advanced port operations, and it is necessary to organize the issues and characteristics of the TOS. Methods: The characteristics of TOSs introduced in Japan and those widely introduced in Europe and Southeast Asia will be investigated and discussed according to the port management system in Japan. Results: Japanese TOSs are characterized by a lack of automated functions, such as ship loading plans, and by the fact that they are designed to allow the crane driver to select the order of operations, which may be attributed to a system wherein stakeholders are segmented and on-site decisions are emphasized. The promotion of smart ports in Japanese-style ports requires a system for information linkage between stakeholders. Conclusions: TOS capabilities for smart ports should be implemented according to the characteristics of port management in each region, and the studies conducted in this paper are useful in examining port system implementation strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Port governance and cooperation: The case of Japan
    Shinohara, Masato
    Saika, Takehiko
    [J]. RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 26 : 56 - 66
  • [2] The Role of Port Authority in Port Governance and Port Community System Implementation
    Tijan, Edvard
    Jovic, Marija
    Panjako, Ana
    Zgaljic, Drazen
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 14
  • [3] Study on Model of Port GIS Operation System
    Fan Deming
    [J]. 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND SAFETY ENGINEERING (MSSE 2010), VOLS I AND II, 2010, : 121 - 123
  • [4] Constructing Governance Framework of a Green and Smart Port
    Chen, Jihong
    Huang, Tiancun
    Xie, Xiaoke
    Lee, Paul Tae-Woo
    Hua, Chengying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 7 (04)
  • [5] Digital Governance Approach to the Spanish Port System: Proposal for a Port
    Gomez Diaz, Cristina
    Gonzalez-Cancelas, Nicoletta
    Camarero Orive, Alberto
    Soler Flores, Francisco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [6] Allometric relationship between port throughput growth and urban population: A case study of Shanghai port and Shanghai city
    Chen, Jihong
    Fei, Yijie
    Zhu, Yuhua
    Zhang, Fangwei
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 10 (03):
  • [7] Impact of COVID-19 on Port Production and Operation Based on System Dynamics: A Case Study of Shanghai Port in China
    Tai, Zili
    Guo, Ji
    Guan, Yeli
    Shi, Qingquan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2021, 2021
  • [8] The nexus between port governance and performance
    Caldeirinha, Vitor R.
    Augusto Felicio, J.
    da Cunha, Sandra F.
    da Luz, Luis Machado
    [J]. MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2018, 45 (07) : 877 - 892
  • [9] Increasing terminal capacity based on adaptive port planning case study at Cigading Port, Indonesia
    Utama, D. P.
    Berawi, M. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION IN ENGINEERING AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION 2019 (ICIEVE 2019), PTS 1-4, 2020, 830
  • [10] Port governance in Turkey The age of the global terminal operators
    Esmer, Soner
    Duru, Okan
    [J]. RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 22 : 214 - 223