Being a happy farmer: Technology adoption and subjective well-being

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Yan [1 ]
Chen, Minjie [2 ]
Yu, Jianyu [3 ]
Wang, Xiaobing [4 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Univ, Business Coll, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Res Inst Econ & Management, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, China Ctr Agr Policy, Sch Adv Agr Sci, Yiheyuan Rd 5, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
Farmers; Subjective well-being; Agricultural mechanization services; AGRICULTURAL MECHANIZATION SERVICES; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION; INCOME COMPARISONS; IMPACT; TIME; HAPPINESS; LEISURE; CHINA; PRODUCTIVITY; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2024.03.028
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper empirically investigates the impact of technology adoption on farmers' subjective well-being, as measured by happiness and life satisfaction. A theoretical framework is constructed to link farmers' subjective well-being to technology adoption, with a particular emphasis on mechanization services in agricultural production. By fitting a nationally representative panel dataset - China Family Panel Studies - into an endogenous switching regression model that addresses potential selection bias, we find that technology adoption leads to a 0.194 standard deviation increase in happiness and a 0.065 standard deviation increase in life satisfaction. Further analysis reveals that the effect is more pronounced for individuals engaged in off-farm employment and varies across farm sizes. To underpin the causal effect, we test three plausible mechanisms - absolute income, relative income, and leisure - which are well-documented in the literature for their correlations with happiness and life satisfaction. Our empirical analysis indicates that the adoption of agricultural mechanization services indeed increases the absolute income of farmers and allows them to allocate more time to leisure activities.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 405
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Born to be Happy? The Etiology of Subjective Well-Being
    Bartels, Meike
    Boomsma, Dorret I.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2009, 39 (06) : 605 - 615
  • [2] Born to be Happy? The Etiology of Subjective Well-Being
    Meike Bartels
    Dorret I. Boomsma
    [J]. Behavior Genetics, 2009, 39 : 605 - 615
  • [3] Erratum to: The Happy Farmer: Self-Employment and Subjective Well-Being in Rural Vietnam
    Thomas Markussen
    Maria Fibæk
    Finn Tarp
    Nguyen Do Anh Tuan
    [J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2018, 19 : 1637 - 1637
  • [4] Are you happy yet? Entrepreneurs' subjective well-being
    Sherman, Cynthia L.
    Randall, Craig
    Kauanui, Sandra K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SPIRITUALITY & RELIGION, 2016, 13 (01) : 7 - 23
  • [5] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING - COMPONENTS OF WELL-BEING
    GLATZER, W
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1987, 19 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [6] Subjective well-being is essential to well-being
    Diener, E
    Sapyta, JJ
    Suh, E
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 1998, 9 (01) : 33 - 37
  • [7] Happy as an extraverted clam? The role of personality for subjective well-being
    DeNeve, KM
    [J]. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 8 (05) : 141 - 144
  • [8] Happy Talk: Mode of Administration Effects on Subjective Well-Being
    Dolan, Paul
    Kavetsos, Georgios
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2016, 17 (03) : 1273 - 1291
  • [9] Is there a happy culture? Multiple paths to national subjective well-being
    Pereira, Maria C.
    Coelho, Filipe
    Silva, Graca Miranda
    [J]. KYKLOS, 2023, 76 (04) : 613 - 641
  • [10] Happy Talk: Mode of Administration Effects on Subjective Well-Being
    Paul Dolan
    Georgios Kavetsos
    [J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2016, 17 : 1273 - 1291