Ensuring best practice in genomics education: A scoping review of genomics education needs assessments and evaluations

被引:1
|
作者
Nisselle, Amy [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Terrill, Bronwyn [1 ,2 ]
Janinski, Monika [1 ,2 ]
Metcalfe, Sylvia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gaff, Clara [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Australian Genom Hlth Alliance, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Genom Soc, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS; TRAINING-PROGRAM; BREAST-CANCER; PRIMARY-CARE; GENETICS EDUCATION; COMPETENCES; PHYSICIANS; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.06.005
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
A health workforce capable of implementing genomic medicine requires effective genomics education. Genomics education interventions developed for health professions over the last two decades, and their impact, are variably described in the literature. To inform an evaluation framework for genomics education, we undertook an exploratory scoping review of published needs assessments for, and/or evaluations of, genomics education interventions for health professionals from 2000 to 2023. We retrieved and screened 4,659 records across the two searches with 363 being selected for full-text review and consideration by an interdisciplinary working group. 104 articles were selected for inclusion in the review-60 needs assessments, 52 genomics education evaluations, and eight describing both. Included articles spanned all years and described education interventions in over 30 countries. Target audiences included medical specialists, nurses/midwives, and/or allied health professionals. Evaluation questions, outcomes, and measures were extracted, categorized, and tabulated to iteratively compare measures across stages of genomics education evaluation: planning (pre-implementation), development and delivery (implementation), and impact (immediate, intermediate, or long-term outcomes). They are presented here along with descriptions of study designs. We document the wide variability in evaluation approaches and terminology used to define measures and note that few articles considered downstream (long-term) outcomes of genomics education interventions. Alongside the evaluation framework for genomics education, results from this scoping review form part of a toolkit to help educators to undertake rigorous genomics evaluation that is fit for purpose and can contribute to the growing evidence base of the contribution of genomics education in implementation strategies for genomic medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1508 / 1523
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation
    Gaff, Clara
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2023, 31 : 81 - 82
  • [2] Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics)
    Nisselle, Amy
    Janinski, Monika
    Martyn, Melissa
    McClaren, Belinda
    Kaunein, Nadia
    Barlow-Stewart, Kristine
    Belcher, Andrea
    Bernat, John A.
    Best, Stephanie
    Bishop, Michelle
    Carroll, June C.
    Cornel, Martina
    Dissanayake, Vajira H. W.
    Dodds, Agnes
    Dunlop, Kate
    Garg, Gunjan
    Gear, Russell
    Graves, Debra
    Knight, Ken
    Korf, Bruce
    Kumar, Dhavendra
    Laurino, Mercy
    Ma, Alan
    Maguire, Jane
    Mallett, Andrew
    McCarthy, Maria
    McEwen, Alison
    Mulder, Nicola
    Patel, Chirag
    Quinlan, Catherine
    Reed, Kate
    Riggs, Erin Rooney
    Sinnerbrink, Ingrid
    Slavotinek, Anne
    Suppiah, Vijayaprakash
    Terrill, Bronwyn
    Tobias, Edward S.
    Tonkin, Emma
    Trumble, Steve
    Wessels, Tina-Marie
    Metcalfe, Sylvia
    Jordan, Helen
    Gaff, Clara
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 23 (07) : 1356 - 1365
  • [3] Correspondence on "Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: Reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics)" by Nisselle et al
    Dwyer, Andrew A.
    Calzone, Kathleen A.
    Dewell, Sarah
    Badzek, Laurie
    Patch, Christine
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 24 (04) : 962 - 963
  • [4] Ensuring best practice in genomics education: A theory- and empirically informed evaluation framework
    Nisselle, Amy
    Terrill, Bronwyn
    Janinski, Monika
    Martyn, Melissa
    Jordan, Helen
    Kaunein, Nadia
    Metcalfe, Sylvia
    Gaff, Clara
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2024, 111 (08) : 1497 - 1507
  • [5] Correspondence on "Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: Reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics)" by Nisselle et al Response
    Gaff, Clara
    Nisselle, Amy
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 24 (04) : 964 - 964
  • [6] Genomics for Nursing Education and Practice: Measuring Competency
    Anderson, Gwen
    Alt-White, Anna C.
    Schaa, Kendra L.
    Boyd, Andrea M.
    Kasper, Christine E.
    [J]. WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2015, 12 (03) : 165 - 175
  • [7] Patient Education on Genomics
    Murfin, Melissa
    [J]. PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT CLINICS, 2024, 9 (04) : 601 - 614
  • [8] Genomics Education at Scale
    Bishop, M.
    Miller, E.
    McPherson, A.
    Pope, A.
    Seller, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2018, 26 : 72 - 72
  • [9] Genomics Education in Practice: Evaluation of a Mobile Lab Design
    van Mil, Marc H. W.
    Boerwinkel, Dirk Jan
    Buizer-Voskamp, Jacobine E.
    Speksnijder, Annelies
    Waarlo, Arend Jan
    [J]. BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2010, 38 (04) : 224 - 229
  • [10] The Genomics Education Partnership
    Hauser, Charles
    Bailey, C.
    Elgin, S. C. R.
    Lopatto, D.
    [J]. FASEB JOURNAL, 2009, 23