Legal age limits in accessing donor information: experiences of donor-conceived people, parents, sperm donors and counsellors

被引:1
|
作者
Bolt, Sophie H. [1 ]
Maas, A. Janneke B. M. [1 ]
Indekeu, Astrid [1 ,2 ]
van Nistelrooij, Inge [3 ]
机构
[1] Fiom, Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Sociol Res, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Humanist Studies, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Age limits; Donor-conceived people; Donor conception; Donor information; Identifiable donor; IDENTITY; ADOLESCENTS; CONCEPTION; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.103846
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Research question: What are the lived experiences of donor -conceived people, parents, sperm donors and counsellors related to legal age limits on accessing donor information in the Netherlands? Design: A phenomenological study was carried out that included 20 donor -conceived individuals, 15 parents, 6 sperm donors and 5 counsellors. Data were collected through online qualitative in-depth interviews and focus groups. The data were analysed using Dahlberg's Reflective Lifeworld Approach. Results: The results show how: (i) age limits create challenges related to dependency, autonomy and loyalty to parents; (ii) donor information can be important for identity development, which looks different at different ages; (iii) inaccessible information can lead to unfair loss and may be perceived as negative; (iv) relational stability provides a good foundation for dealing with the (in)accessibility of donor information; (v) procedural barriers and age limits increase the inaccessibility of donor information; and (vi) comprehensive counselling is desired for donor -conceived individuals, parents and donors. Conclusions: This study shows that legal age limits on accessing donor information can lead to several negative consequences. The age limits focus on one individual, which is not appropriate for questions about ancestry that always pertain to a relational network. Counselling should be tailored to the child's needs, and the child's family should be involved. Furthermore, the donor should receive independent counselling.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] The motives and experiences of donor-conceived persons requesting the identity of their sperm donors
    Widbom, Andreas
    Isaksson, Stina
    Sydsjo, Gunilla
    Svanberg, Agneta Skoog
    Lampic, Claudia
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2024, 48 (01)
  • [2] The motivations of donor-conceived adults for seeking information about, and contact with, sperm donors
    Macmillan, Caitlin M.
    Allan, Sonia
    Johnstone, Melissa
    Stokes, Mark A.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2021, 43 (01) : 149 - 158
  • [3] Sperm donors describe the experience of contact with their donor-conceived offspring
    Hertz, R.
    Nelson, M. K.
    Kramer, W.
    FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2015, 7 (02): : 91 - 100
  • [4] Experiences of genetic relatedness among donor-conceived adults sharing the same sperm donor
    Blyth, E.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 : I78 - I79
  • [5] Factors associated with searching for people related through donor conception among donor-conceived people, parents, and donors a systematic review
    Indekeu, Astrid
    Maas, A. Janneke. B. M.
    McCormick, Emily
    Benward, Jean
    Scheib, Joanna E.
    F&S REVIEWS, 2021, 2 (02): : 93 - 119
  • [7] Are donor-conceived people willing to use donors themselves? Insights from individuals conceived via donor-assisted reproduction
    Siegel, D. R.
    Sheeder, J.
    Kramer, W.
    Roeca, C.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 (09) : 2087 - 2094
  • [8] Six years of experience with DNA-linking donor-conceived offspring and sperm donors
    Maas, A. J. B. M.
    Postema, D.
    Van Loon, A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 389 - 389
  • [9] Access to information about donors by donor-conceived individuals: A human rights analysis
    Allan, Sonia
    JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 2013, 20 (03) : 655 - 670
  • [10] Donor Conception and “Passing,” or; Why Australian Parents of Donor-Conceived Children Want Donors Who Look Like Them
    Karen-Anne Wong
    Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2017, 14 : 77 - 86