Cybercrime Intention Recognition: A Systematic Literature Review

被引:0
|
作者
Kassa, Yidnekachew Worku [1 ]
James, Joshua Isaac [2 ]
Belay, Elefelious Getachew [1 ]
机构
[1] Addis Ababa Univ, Addis Ababa Inst Technol AAiT, Sch Informat Technol & Engn, POB 1176, Addis Ababa 1176, Ethiopia
[2] DFIR Sci LLC, Bangkok 10110, Thailand
关键词
digital forensics; digital investigation; intention recognition; goal recognition; plan recognition; cyberattack; cybercrime; model; FORENSICS;
D O I
10.3390/info15050263
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this systematic literature review, we delve into the realm of intention recognition within the context of digital forensics and cybercrime. The rise of cybercrime has become a major concern for individuals, organizations, and governments worldwide. Digital forensics is a field that deals with the investigation and analysis of digital evidence in order to identify, preserve, and analyze information that can be used as evidence in a court of law. Intention recognition is a subfield of artificial intelligence that deals with the identification of agents' intentions based on their actions and change of states. In the context of cybercrime, intention recognition can be used to identify the intentions of cybercriminals and even to predict their future actions. Employing a PRISMA systematic review approach, we curated research articles from reputable journals and categorized them into three distinct modeling approaches: logic-based, classical machine learning-based, and deep learning-based. Notably, intention recognition has transcended its historical confinement to network security, now addressing critical challenges across various subdomains, including social engineering attacks, artificial intelligence black box vulnerabilities, and physical security. While deep learning emerges as the dominant paradigm, its inherent lack of transparency poses a challenge in the digital forensics landscape. However, it is imperative that models developed for digital forensics possess intrinsic attributes of explainability and logical coherence, thereby fostering judicial confidence, mitigating biases, and upholding accountability for their determinations. To this end, we advocate for hybrid solutions that blend explainability, reasonableness, efficiency, and accuracy. Furthermore, we propose the creation of a taxonomy to precisely define intention recognition, paving the way for future advancements in this pivotal field.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Systematic Literature Review on Social Entrepreneurial Intention
    Luc Phan Tan
    Le, Angelina Nhat Hanh
    Lan Pham Xuan
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2020, 11 (03) : 241 - 256
  • [2] Cybercrime threat intelligence: A systematic multi-vocal literature review
    Cascavilla, Giuseppe
    Tamburri, Damian A.
    Van den Heuvel, Willem-Jan
    COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2021, 105
  • [3] A systematic literature review of nurse shortage and the intention to leave
    Chan, Zenobia C. Y.
    Tam, Wun San
    Lung, Maggie K. Y.
    Wong, Wing Yan
    Chau, Ching Wa
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2013, 21 (04) : 605 - 613
  • [4] Information Technology Continuance Intention: A Systematic Literature Review
    Nabavi, Ali
    Taghavi-Fard, Mohammad Taghi
    Hanafizadeh, Payam
    Taghva, Mohammad Reza
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 12 (01) : 58 - 95
  • [5] Continuance intention of online technologies: A systematic literature review
    Yan, Min
    Filieri, Raffaele
    Gorton, Matthew
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 58
  • [6] Sustainable Luxury and Consumer Purchase Intention: A Systematic Literature Review
    Zhao, Luming
    Peng, Jiaxi
    Yu, Shubin
    SAGE OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [7] From personal values to entrepreneurial intention: a systematic literature review
    Hueso, Juan Alberto
    Jaen, Inmaculada
    Linan, Francisco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOR & RESEARCH, 2021, 27 (01): : 205 - 230
  • [8] Computational humor recognition: a systematic literature review
    Kalloniatis, Antonios
    Adamidis, Panagiotis
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2025, 58 (02)
  • [9] Neuromarketing and Facial Recognition: A Systematic Literature Review
    Espinoza Mina, Marcos Antonio
    Gallegos Barzola, Doris Del Pilar
    TECHNOLOGIES AND INNOVATION (CITI 2018), 2018, 883 : 214 - 228
  • [10] No Patterns in Pattern Recognition: A Systematic Literature Review
    Dasgupta, Annwesa
    Purzer, Senay
    2016 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2016,