Assessing drivers of sustained engagement in collaborative governance arrangements

被引:0
|
作者
Ambrose, Graham [1 ]
Siddiki, Saba [2 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Raleigh, NC 27607 USA
[2] Syracuse Univ, Maxwell Sch, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
关键词
collaborative governance; stakeholder engagement; conflict; environmental justice council; computational text analysis; CONFLICT; ECOLOGY; PERCEPTIONS; COALITION; FRAMEWORK; NETWORKS; LESSONS; FUTURE; GAMES;
D O I
10.1093/jopart/muae005
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The formal engagement of diverse stakeholder groups in policy design and implementation has become a mainstay governance strategy. While much has been learned about collaborative governance arrangements in terms of their structure, processes, and participant dynamics, one particularly salient dynamic has been relatively underexplored: the factors contributing to sustained participation in collaborative venues. Public administration and policy have developed a variety of conceptual theories which draw attention to interpersonal interactions and the ability of stakeholders to garner political wins as important contributing factors to sustained participation. In this article, we test four theoretically rooted hypotheses to investigate stakeholder attendance in the collaborative governance case of an environmental justice council. We analyze council meeting minute data using computational text analysis tools and a Stochastic Actor-Oriented Model to assess: (1) conflict and concord, measured in terms of repeated (dis)agreement with others and (2) interest advancement, or the extent to which a stakeholder makes positive, neutral, and negative comments toward topics which become the council's annual objectives in relation to an individual's attendance. Our interpersonal interaction results show that increased positive relationships are associated with increased attendance, and increased negative relationships are associated with decreased attendance, but, for both cases, only when interactions are repeated and not one-off. Our interest advancement results show: (1) an increase in supported annual objectives is associated with decreases in attendance for an individual stakeholder, but (2) increased oppositional and neutral annual topics are associated with a greater likelihood of attendance. This article contributes to existing scholarship on collaborative governance by offering additional insights into individual factors associated with sustained engagement in the collaborative venue. Furthermore, the article offers a generalizable methodological approach for analyzing these dynamics drawing on computational text analysis of meeting minute data.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Drivers of collaborative governance for the green transition
    Nielsen, Rasmus Ojvind
    Sorensen, Eva
    Torfing, Jacob
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024,
  • [2] Drivers of (in)equity in collaborative environmental governance
    Dobbin, Kristin Babson
    Kuo, Michael
    Lubell, Mark
    Bostic, Darcy
    Mendoza, Jessica
    Echeveste, Ernest
    [J]. POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2023, 51 (02) : 375 - 395
  • [3] Thinking Harder About Outcomes for Collaborative Governance Arrangements
    Rogers, Ellen
    Weber, Edward P.
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2010, 40 (05): : 546 - 567
  • [4] Drivers and Dynamics of Collaborative Governance in Environmental Management
    Ulibarri, Nicola
    Imperial, Mark T.
    Siddiki, Saba
    Henderson, Hayley
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 71 (3) : 495 - 504
  • [5] Drivers and Dynamics of Collaborative Governance in Environmental Management
    Nicola Ulibarri
    Mark T. Imperial
    Saba Siddiki
    Hayley Henderson
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2023, 71 : 495 - 504
  • [6] Assessing youth engagement with a collaborative Index
    Marrades, Ramon
    Pajevic, Filipa
    Dobrescu, Simona
    [J]. 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INDICATORS (STI 2016), 2016, : 1011 - 1011
  • [7] THE GOVERNANCE OF INNOVATION - VERTICAL INTEGRATION AND COLLABORATIVE ARRANGEMENTS IN THE BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY
    PISANO, GP
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 1991, 20 (03) : 237 - 249
  • [8] Beyond engagement: Enhancing equity in collaborative water governance
    Koebele, Elizabeth A.
    Mendez-Barrientos, Linda E.
    Nadeau, Nikki
    Gerlak, Andrea K.
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER, 2024, 11 (02):
  • [9] Integrative leadership for collaborative governance: Civic engagement in Seattle
    Page, Stephen
    [J]. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2010, 21 (02): : 246 - 263
  • [10] A Framework for Assessing Power in Collaborative Governance Processes
    Purdy, Jill M.
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2012, 72 (03) : 409 - 417