Literature Review on Human-Automation Interaction: Relationship Between Healthcare Automation and Human Error at Work

被引:0
|
作者
Cho, Min Ho [1 ]
Seo, Yejin [1 ]
Duffy, Vincent G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
关键词
Healthcare; Automation; Human Error; Dispensing Robot; Medication Error; Reliability;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-61063-9_2
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
With the development of technology to reduce human errors in medical settings, healthcare has adopted various automation in its systems. This automation system aims to enhance efficiency, accuracy, and patient outcomes. However, the introduction of new systems can change the work environment and lead to undesired outcomes. To examine this relationship, a systematic literature review was conducted using the two keywords 'healthcare automation' and 'human error atwork'. The analysis begins by obtaining metadata from different sources, including Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, and Dimension. Various bibliometric tools such as VOSViewer, BibExcel, MaxQDA, CiteSpace, and Google Ngram were utilized to gather insights and relationships between the two topics. These approaches help understand the general trends and climate of the two topics and fields. This comprehensive analysis not only expands our understanding of each topic individually but also highlights the link between the two topics, showcasing the complex relationship of technology, healthcare, and work settings.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 34
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Work domain modeling of human-automation interaction for in-vehicle automation
    Zhang, You
    Lintern, Gavan
    [J]. COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2024, : 585 - 601
  • [2] Formal verification of human-automation interaction
    Degani, A
    Heymann, M
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2002, 44 (01) : 28 - 43
  • [3] History and future of human-automation interaction
    Janssen, Christian P.
    Donker, Stella F.
    Brumby, Duncan P.
    Kun, Andrew L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2019, 131 : 99 - 107
  • [4] Using formal verification to evaluate human-automation interaction: A review
    Bolton, Matthew L.
    Bass, Ellen J.
    Siminiceanu, Radu I.
    [J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2013, 43 (03) : 488 - 503
  • [5] Using Formal Verification to Evaluate Human-Automation Interaction: A Review
    Bolton, Matthew L.
    Bass, Ellen J.
    Siminiceanu, Radu I.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2013, 43 (03): : 488 - 503
  • [6] Challenges in implementation of human-automation interaction models
    Fereidunian, Alireza
    Lucas, Caro
    Lesani, Hamid
    Lehtonen, Matti
    Nordman, Mikael
    [J]. 2007 MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE ON CONTROL & AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 1266 - +
  • [7] Automation transparency: implications of uncertainty communication for human-automation interaction and interfaces
    Kunze, Alexander
    Summerskill, Stephen J.
    Marshall, Russell
    Filtness, Ashleigh J.
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2019, 62 (03) : 345 - 360
  • [8] The role of social support in human-automation interaction
    Sauer, Juergen
    Sonderegger, Andreas
    Semmer, Norbert K.
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2024, 67 (06) : 732 - 743
  • [9] Intuitive Cognition and Models of Human-Automation Interaction
    Patterson, Robert Earl
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2017, 59 (01) : 101 - 115
  • [10] Similarities and differences between human-human and human-automation trust: an integrative review
    Madhavan, P.
    Wiegmann, D. A.
    [J]. THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2007, 8 (04) : 277 - 301