Effects of different sonication parameters of theta burst transcranial ultrasound stimulation on human motor cortex

被引:5
|
作者
Zeng, Ke [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zhiwei [3 ]
Xia, Xue [2 ,4 ]
Wang, Zhen [2 ,5 ]
Darmani, Ghazaleh [2 ]
Li, Xiaoli [1 ]
Chen, Robert [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Ctr Cognit & Neuroergon, State Key Lab Cognit Neurosci & Learning, Zhuhai, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Krembil Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Yanshan Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Qinhuangdao, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Sch Social Dev & Hlth Management, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[5] Xian Phys Educ Univ, Sch Sport & Hlth Sci, Xian, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Div Neurol, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
I-WAVE INTERACTION; LONG-TERM POTENTIATION; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY; INTRACORTICAL INHIBITION; THALAMIC-STIMULATION; EXCITABILITY; FACILITATION; PLASTICITY; INDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2024.03.001
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Theta burst TUS (tbTUS) can induce increased cortical excitability in human, but how different sonication parameters influence the effects are still unknown. Objective: To examine how a range of sonication parameters, including acoustic intensity, pulse repetition frequency, duty cycle and sonication duration, influence the effects of tbTUS on human motor cortical excitability. Methods: 14 right-handed healthy subjects underwent 8 sessions with different tbTUS parameters in a randomized, cross-over design on separate days. The original tbTUS protocol was studied in one session and one parameter was changed in each of the seven sessions. To examine changes in cortical excitability induced by tbTUS, we measured the motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, resting motor threshold, short-interval intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation, as well as short-interval intracortical facilitation before and up to 90 min after tbTUS. Results: All conditions increased MEP amplitudes except the condition with low acoustic intensity of 10 W/cm(2). Pulse repetition frequency of 5 Hz produced higher MEP amplitudes compared to pulse repetition frequencies of 2 and 10 Hz. In addition, higher duty cycles (5%, 10%, and 15%) and longer sonication durations (40, 80, and 120 s) were associated with longer duration of increased MEP amplitudes. Resting motor threshold remained stable in all conditions. For paired-pulse TMS measures, tbTUS reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition and enhanced short-interval intracortical facilitation, but had no effect on intracortical facilitation. Conclusions: Ultrasound bursts repeated at theta (similar to 5 Hz) frequency is optimal to produce increased cortical excitability with the range of 2-10 Hz. Furthermore, there was a dose-response effect regarding duty cycle and sonication duration in tbTUS for plasticity induction. The aftereffects of tbTUS were associated with a shift of the inhibition/excitation balance toward less inhibition and more excitation in the motor cortex. These findings can be used to determine the optimal tbTUS parameters in neuroscience research and treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 268
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Induction of Human Motor Cortex Plasticity by Theta Burst Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation
    Zeng, Ke
    Darmani, Ghazaleh
    Fomenko, Anton
    Xia, Xue
    Tran, Stephanie
    Nankoo, Jean-Francois
    Oghli, Yazan Shamli
    Wang, Yanqiu
    Lozano, Andres M.
    Chen, Robert
    [J]. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2022, 91 (02) : 238 - 252
  • [2] Effects of the motor cortical theta-burst transcranial-focused ultrasound stimulation on the contralateral motor cortex
    Xia, Xue
    Wang, Zhen
    Zeng, Ke
    Nankoo, Jean-Francois
    Darmani, Ghazaleh
    Tran, Stephanie
    Ding, Mandy Yi Rong
    Chen, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2024, 602 (12): : 2931 - 2943
  • [3] Effects of theta burst transcranial ultrasound stimulation on motor cortex excitability in Parkinson's disease.
    Grippe, T.
    Oghli, Y. Shamli
    Darmani, G.
    Nankoo, J. F.
    Raies, N.
    Sarica, C.
    Arora, T.
    Rinchon, C.
    Gunraj, C.
    Cardoso, F.
    Chen, R.
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2023, 38 : S538 - S539
  • [4] Mechanisms of theta burst transcranial ultrasound induced plasticity in the human motor cortex
    Oghli, Yazan Shamli
    Grippe, Talyta
    Arora, Tarun
    Hoque, Tasnuva
    Darmani, Ghazaleh
    Chen, Robert
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2023, 16 (04) : 1135 - 1143
  • [5] Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex
    Huang, YZ
    Edwards, MJ
    Rounis, E
    Bhatia, KP
    Rothwell, JC
    [J]. NEURON, 2005, 45 (02) : 201 - 206
  • [6] Effects of 30 Hz Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the primary motor cortex
    Wu, Steve W.
    Shahana, Nasrin
    Huddleston, David A.
    Gilbert, Donald L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2012, 208 (02) : 161 - 164
  • [7] Neuromodulatory effects of motor cortex theta burst stimulation
    Carrette, S.
    Vonck, K.
    Carrette, E.
    De Moor, M.
    Raedt, R.
    Boon, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2021, 28 : 405 - 405
  • [8] Transcranial ultrasound stimulation of the human motor cortex
    Zhang, Yi
    Ren, Liyuan
    Liu, Kai
    Tong, Shanbao
    Yuan, Ti-Fei
    Sun, Junfeng
    [J]. ISCIENCE, 2021, 24 (12)
  • [9] The physiological basis of the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex
    Di Lazzaro, V.
    Pilato, F.
    Dileone, M.
    Profice, P.
    Oliviero, A.
    Mazzone, P.
    Insola, A.
    Ranieri, F.
    Meglio, M.
    Tonali, P. A.
    Rothwell, J. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2008, 586 (16): : 3871 - 3879
  • [10] Analgesic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in neuropathic pain: Influence of theta burst stimulation priming
    Lefaucheur, J. -P.
    Ayache, S. S.
    Sorel, M.
    Farhat, W. H.
    Zouari, H. G.
    Ciampi de Andrade, D.
    Ahdab, R.
    Menard-Lefaucheur, I.
    Brugieres, P.
    Goujon, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 16 (10) : 1403 - 1413