共 50 条
Policy strategies for capacity building and scale up of the workforce for comprehensive cancer care: a systematic review
被引:0
|作者:
Trapani, D.
[1
,2
]
Murthy, S. S.
[3
]
Hammad, N.
[4
]
Casolino, R.
[5
]
Moreira, D. C.
[6
]
Roitberg, F.
[7
]
Blay, J. -Y.
[8
]
Curigliano, G.
[1
,2
]
Ilbawi, A. M.
[5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Oncol & Hematooncol, Milan, Italy
[2] IRCCS, European Inst Oncol, Via Ripamonti 435, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Div Surg Oncol, Global Canc Dispar Initiat, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Toronto, Michaels Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] WHO, Dept Noncommunicable Dis, Geneva, Switzerland
[6] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Global Pediat Med, Memphis, TN USA
[7] Hosp Sirio Libanes, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[8] Ctr Leon Berard, Dept Med Oncol, Lyon, France
来源:
关键词:
cancer workforce;
capacity-building;
global oncology;
cancer policy;
SWOT;
AAAQ;
WHO Strategy;
PEDIATRIC NEUROONCOLOGY;
MOBILE MAMMOGRAPHY;
DEVELOPING-COUNTRY;
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL;
PALLIATIVE CARE;
BREAST-CANCER;
COLLABORATION;
ONCOLOGY;
TELEMEDICINE;
IMPROVEMENT;
D O I:
10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102946
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background: Patients with cancer in low- and middle-income countries experience worse outcomes as a result of the limited capacity of health systems to deliver comprehensive cancer care. The health workforce is a key component of health systems; however, deep gaps exist in the availability and accessibility of cancer care providers. Materials and methods: We carried out a systematic review of the literature evaluating the strategies for capacity building of the cancer workforce. We studied how the policy strategies addressed the availability, accessibility, acceptability, and quality (AAAQ) of the workforce. We used a strategic planning framework (SWOT: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) to identify actionable areas of capacity building. We contextualized our fi ndings based on the WHO 2030 Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health , evaluating how they can ultimately be framed in a labour market approach and inform strategies to improve the capacity of the workforce (PROSPERO: CRD42020109377). Results: The systematic review of the literature yielded 9617 records, and we selected 45 eligible papers for data extraction. The workforce interventions identi fi ed were delivered mostly in the African and American Regions, and in two-thirds of cases, in high-income countries. Many strategies have been shown to increase the number of competent oncology providers. Optimization of the existing workforce through role delegation and digital health interventions was reported as a short- to mid-term solution to optimize cancer care, through quality-oriented, ef fi ciency-improving, and acceptability-enforcing workforce strategies. The increased workload alone was potentially detrimental. The literature on retaining the workforce and reducing brain drain or attrition in underserved areas was commonly limited. Conclusions: Workforce capacity building is not only a quantitative problem but can also be addressed through qualityoriented, organizational, and managerial solutions of human resources. The delivery of comprehensive, acceptable, and impact-oriented cancer care requires an available, accessible, and competent workforce for comprehensive cancer care. Ef fi ciency-improving strategies may be instrumental for capacity building in resource-constrained settings.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文