The word superiority effect overcomes crowding

被引:0
|
作者
Cutler, June [1 ]
Bodet, Alexandre [1 ]
Rivest, Josee [1 ,3 ]
Cavanagh, Patrick [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Glendon Coll, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M4N 3M6, Canada
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[3] York Univ, Ctr Vis Res, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Crowding; Word-superiority effect; Letter recognition; LETTER IDENTIFICATION; OBJECT RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; CONTEXT; SYMBOLS; DIGITS; WRODS;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2024.108436
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Crowding and the word superiority effect are two perceptual phenomena that influence reading. The identification of the inner letters of a word can be hindered by crowding from adjacent letters, but it can be facilitated by the word context itself (the word superiority effect). In the present study, strings of four-letters (words and nonwords) with different inter-letter spacings (ranging from an optimal spacing to produce crowding to a spacing too large to produce crowding) were presented briefly in the periphery and participants were asked to identify the third letter of the string. Each word had a partner word that was identical except for its third letter (e.g., COLD, CORD) so that guessing as the source of the improved performance for words could be ruled out. Unsurprisingly, letter identification accuracy for words was better than non-words. For non-words, it was lowest at closer spacings, confirming crowding. However, for words, accuracy remained high at all inter-letter spacings showing that crowding did not prevent identification of the inner letters. This result supports models of "holistic" word recognition where partial cues can lead to recognition without first identifying individual letters. Once the word is recognized, its inner letters can be recovered, despite their feature loss produced by crowding.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Failure to replicate a superiority effect in crowding
    Ozkirli, Ayberk
    Pascucci, David
    Herzog, Michael H.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 16 (01)
  • [2] REANALYSIS OF WORD SUPERIORITY EFFECT
    JUOLA, JF
    CHOE, CS
    LEAVITT, DD
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1974, 4 (NA4) : 262 - 262
  • [3] Reply to: Failure to replicate a superiority effect in crowding
    Cicchini, Guido Marco
    D'Errico, Giovanni
    Burr, David Charles
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 16 (01)
  • [4] ON THE WORD-SUPERIORITY EFFECT
    MARCHETTI, FM
    MEWHORT, DJK
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1986, 48 (01): : 23 - 35
  • [5] The anger superiority effect revisited: a visual crowding task
    Gong, Mingliang
    Smart, L. James
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2021, 35 (02) : 214 - 224
  • [6] IS THERE A LEXICALITY COMPONENT IN THE WORD SUPERIORITY EFFECT
    HENDERSON, L
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1980, 28 (02): : 179 - 184
  • [7] EROTOPHOBIA, EROTOPHILIA, AND THE WORD SUPERIORITY EFFECT
    HAERICH, P
    CARMACK, HC
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1992, 30 (06) : 466 - 466
  • [8] INFLECTION, FREQUENCY, AND THE WORD SUPERIORITY EFFECT
    GUNTHER, H
    GFROERER, S
    WEISS, L
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1984, 46 (03): : 261 - 281
  • [9] ANALYSIS OF WORD-SUPERIORITY EFFECT
    BARON, J
    THURSTON, I
    COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 4 (02) : 207 - 228
  • [10] There is no word superiority effect in peripheral vision
    Fine, EM
    VISION SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 35 : 42 - 45