Venous vascular closure system vs. figure-of-eight suture following atrial fibrillation ablation: the STYLE-AF Study

被引:3
|
作者
Tilz, Roland Richard [1 ,2 ]
Feher, Marcel [1 ]
Vogler, Julia [1 ]
Bode, Kerstin [3 ]
Duta, Alexandru Ionut [1 ]
Ortolan, Angela [1 ]
Lopez, Lisbeth Delgado [1 ]
Kuechler, Mirco [1 ]
Mamaev, Roman [1 ]
Lyan, Evgeny [4 ]
Sommer, Philipp [5 ]
Braun, Martin [5 ]
Sciacca, Vanessa [5 ]
Demming, Thomas
Maslova, Vera [4 ]
Kuck, Karl-Heinz [1 ]
Heeger, Christian-Hendrik [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Eitel, Charlotte [1 ]
Popescu, Sorin Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heart Ctr Lubeck, Univ Clin Schleswig Holstein, Dept Rhythmol, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] German Ctr Cardiovasc Res DZHK, Partner Site Hamburg Kiel Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
[3] Heart Ctr Leipzig, Dept Rhythmol, Leipzig, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Schleswig Holstein, Dept Internal Med 3, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
[5] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Electrophysiol & Rhythmol, Herz & Diabeteszentrum NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
[6] Asklepios Klin Altona, Dept Rhythmol, Hamburg, Germany
来源
EUROPACE | 2024年 / 26卷 / 05期
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Cryoballoon; Pulse field ablation; Vascular closure device; Complications;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euae105
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Simplified ablation technologies for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are increasingly performed worldwide. One of the most common complications following PVI are vascular access-related complications. Lately, venous closure systems (VCSs) were introduced into clinical practice, aiming to reduce the time of bed rest, to increase the patients' comfort, and to reduce vascular access-related complications. The aim of the present study is to compare the safety and efficacy of using a VCS to achieve haemostasis following single-shot PVI to the actual standard of care [figure-of-eight suture and manual compression (MC)]. Methods and results This is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, controlled, open-label trial performed at three German centres. Patients were randomized 1:1 to undergo haemostasis either by means of VCS (VCS group) or of a figure-of-eight suture and MC (F8 group). The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to ambulation, while the primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major periprocedural adverse events until hospital discharge. A total of 125 patients were randomized. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The VCS group showed a shorter time to ambulation [109.0 (82.0, 160.0) vs. 269.0 (243.8, 340.5) min; P < 0.001], shorter time to haemostasis [1 (1, 2) vs. 5 (2, 10) min; P < 0.001], and shorter time to discharge eligibility [270 (270, 270) vs. 340 (300, 458) min; P < 0.001]. No major vascular access-related complication was reported in either group. A trend towards a lower incidence of minor vascular access-related complications on the day of procedure was observed in the VCS group [7 (11.1%) vs. 15 (24.2%); P = 0.063] as compared to the control group. Conclusion Following AF ablation, the use of a VCS results in a significantly shorter time to ambulation, time to haemostasis, and time to discharge eligibility. No major vascular access-related complications were identified. The use of MC and a figure-of-eight suture showed a trend towards a higher incidence of minor vascular access-related complications.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Feasibility and safety of temporary subcutaneous venous figure-of-eight suture to achieve haemostasis after ablation of atrial fibrillation
    Traulle, Sarah
    Kubala, Maciej
    Doucy, Alexandre
    Quenum, Serge
    Hermida, Jean-Sylvain
    EUROPACE, 2016, 18 (06): : 815 - 819
  • [2] Comparison of standard vs modified "figure-of-eight" suture to achieve femoral venous hemostasis after cryoballoon based atrial fibrillation ablation
    Yorgun, Hikmet
    Canpolat, Ugur
    Ates, Ahmet Hakan
    Oksul, Metin
    Sener, Yusuf Ziya
    Akkaya, Fatih
    Aytemir, Kudret
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (09): : 1175 - 1182
  • [3] Efficacy and Safety of Figure-of-Eight Suture for Hemostasis After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
    Okada, Masato
    Inoue, Koichi
    Tanaka, Koji
    Ninomiya, Yuichi
    Hirao, Yuko
    Oka, Takafumi
    Tanaka, Nobuaki
    Inoue, Hiroyuki
    Nakamaru, Ryo
    Koyama, Yasushi
    Okamura, Atsunori
    Iwakura, Katsuomi
    Sakata, Yasushi
    Fujii, Kenshi
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2018, 82 (04) : 956 - +
  • [4] Limited efficacy of a figure-of-eight suture for hemostasis after cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation with uninterrupted oral anticoagulants
    Matsunaga-Lee, Yasuharu
    Egami, Yasuyuki
    Yanagawa, Kyosuke
    Nakamura, Hitoshi
    Matsuhiro, Yutaka
    Yasumoto, Koji
    Tanaka, Akihiro
    Okamoto, Naotaka
    Nakamura, Daisuke
    Yano, Masamichi
    Yamato, Masaki
    Shutta, Ryu
    Sakata, Yasushi
    Nishino, Masami
    Tanouchi, Jun
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 76 (01) : 30 - 34
  • [5] A randomized comparison of manual pressure versus figure-of-eight suture for hemostasis after cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation
    Kumar, Vineet
    Wish, Marc
    Venkataraman, Ganesh
    Bliden, Kevin
    Jindal, Manila
    Strickberger, Adam
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 30 (12) : 2806 - 2810
  • [6] Use of figure of eight suture for groin closure with no heparin reversal in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation
    Velagic, Vedran
    Mugnai, Giacomo
    Pasara, Vedran
    Prepolec, Ivan
    Puljevic, Mislay
    Pezo-Nikolic, Borka
    Puljevic, Davor
    Samardzic, Jure
    Cikes, Maja
    Milicic, Davor
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 60 (03) : 433 - 438
  • [7] Use of figure of eight suture for groin closure with no heparin reversal in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation
    Vedran Velagic
    Giacomo Mugnai
    Vedran Pasara
    Ivan Prepolec
    Mislav Puljevic
    Borka Pezo-Nikolic
    Davor Puljevic
    Jure Samardzic
    Maja Cikes
    Davor Milicic
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2021, 60 : 433 - 438
  • [8] Outcomes of vascular closure devices for femoral venous hemostasis following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
    Mills, Mark T.
    Calvert, Peter
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    Luther, Vishal
    Gupta, Dhiraj
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 35 (08) : 1656 - 1662
  • [9] Venous Vascular Closure System (VVCS) vs. Manual Compression (MC) for EP Catheter Ablation: The AMBULATE Randomized Trial
    Natale, Andrea
    Al-Ahmad, Amin
    Bailey, Shane
    Bunch, T. Jared
    Compton, Steven
    De Lurgio, David B.
    Horton, Rodney P.
    Mittal, Suneet
    O'Neill, Padraig
    Spear, William
    Turakhia, Mintu P.
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138 (25) : E769 - E769
  • [10] Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation Ablation vs. Pulmonary Vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: results from the FIRMAP AF study
    Tilz, Roland R.
    Lenz, Corinna
    Sommer, Philipp
    Roza, Meyer-Saraei
    Sarver, Anne E.
    Williams, Christopher G.
    Heeger, Christian
    Hindricks, Gerhard
    Vogler, Julia
    Eitel, Charlotte
    EUROPACE, 2021, 23 (05): : 722 - 730