Power demands of structures from the Mw 7.8 earthquake of 6 February 2023 in Türkiye

被引:0
|
作者
Lin, Jui-Liang [1 ]
Lin, Che-Min [1 ]
Huang, Jyun-Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Res Earthquake Engn, 200,Sect 3,Xinhai Rd, Taipei 106, Taiwan
关键词
M-w 7.8 earthquake in Turkey; power demand; power spectrum; structural damage; seismic reconnaissance; DIRECTIVITY; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1177/87552930241233251
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Near-fault pulse-like (PL) ground motions generally transmit huge amounts of energy into structures during a relatively short period compared with non-pulse-like (NPL) ground motions. Consequently, power demand has emerged as a direct and distinctive measure for evaluating the risk that PL ground motions pose on structures. This study examines the power demands of structures subjected to ground motions recorded at 10 seismic stations in six city (or town) centers during the M-w 7.8 earthquake that hit T & uuml;rkiye on 6 February 2023. The six cities (or towns), Golbasi, Kahramanmaras, Nurdagi, Osmaniye, Iskenderun, and Antakya, were the locations where an international team conducted field reconnaissance 2 weeks after the earthquake. This study first evaluates the power histories and other seismic responses of single-degree-of-freedom structures exposed to both PL and NPL ground motions. Subsequently, the power spectra of 20 horizontal ground motions recorded at the 10 stations are constructed and examined. Through these investigations, we hope to gain a better understanding of and raise awareness regarding the threats that PL ground motions pose to structures in the six cities (or towns) during the earthquake.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 996
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The preparatory process of the 2023 Mw 7.8 Türkiye earthquake
    Matteo Picozzi
    Antonio G. Iaccarino
    Daniele Spallarossa
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [2] The landslide source of the eastern Mediterranean tsunami on 6 February 2023 following the Mw 7.8 Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) inland earthquake
    Mohammad Heidarzadeh
    Aditya Riadi Gusman
    Iyan E. Mulia
    Geoscience Letters, 10
  • [3] Duration of Mw ≥ 5 aftershocks of the 6 February 2023 Mw 7.8 Turkiye earthquake
    Harsh K. Gupta
    Rajesh Rekapalli
    Natural Hazards, 2024, 120 : 4031 - 4033
  • [4] Duration of Mw ≥ 5 aftershocks of the 6 February 2023 Mw 7.8 Turkiye earthquake
    Gupta, Harsh K.
    Rekapalli, Rajesh
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2024, 120 (04) : 4031 - 4033
  • [5] An Mw 7.8 Earthquake on 6 February 2023 on the East Anatolian Fault, Turkey
    R. K. Chadha
    Journal of the Geological Society of India, 2023, 99 : 449 - 453
  • [6] An Mw 7.8 Earthquake on 6 February 2023 on the East Anatolian Fault, Turkey
    Chadha, R. K.
    JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2023, 99 (04) : 449 - 453
  • [7] Characterisation of acrylic copolymer treated concretes and concretes of reinforced concrete buildings collapsed in the 6 February 2023 Mw=7.8 Kahramanmaras , (Türkiye) earthquake
    Dogruyol, Murat
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2024, 161
  • [8] Performance of hydraulic structures during 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, earthquake sequence
    Cetin, Kemal Onder
    Cuceoglu, Faik
    Ayhan, Bilal Umut
    Yildirim, Sefa
    Aydin, Seckin
    Demirdogen, Sarper
    Er, Yasemin
    Gurbuz, Ayhan
    Moss, Robb Eric S.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2024, 40 (04) : 2231 - 2267
  • [9] Geomagnetic response to the earthquake in Türkiye and Syria on February 6, 2023
    Riabova, Svetlana
    Shalimov, Sergey
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2024, 33 (04) : 430 - 440
  • [10] Automated Assessment of Hazards of Aftershocks of the Mw 7.8 Earthquake in Turkey of February 6, 2023
    Baranov, S. V.
    Shebalin, P. N.
    Vorobieva, I. A.
    Selyutskaya, O. V.
    IZVESTIYA-PHYSICS OF THE SOLID EARTH, 2023, 59 (06) : 939 - 946