Evaluation of biogas production and bacterial load from co-digestion of chicken manure with different types of household waste

被引:1
|
作者
Haque, Mohammad Enamul [1 ]
Ryndin, Roman [2 ]
Mang, Heinz-Peter [2 ]
Kabir, Humayun [3 ]
Islam, Mohammad Alimul [1 ]
机构
[1] Bangladesh Agr Univ, Dept Microbiol & Hyg, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
[2] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing USTB, Ctr Sustainable Environm Sanitat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Bangladesh Agr Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
来源
JSFA REPORTS | 2024年 / 4卷 / 05期
关键词
bacterial load; biogas; CH4; food waste; household waste; prototype digester; soft waste; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; POULTRY;
D O I
10.1002/jsf2.206
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the biogas production of chicken manure (CM) co-digestion with different types of household waste (soft organic [SO] and food waste [FW]), as well as to evaluate the bacterial load of feeding stock and digested slurry samples before and after anaerobic digestion (AD). The experiment was carried out using lab-based prototype digesters for co-digestion of CM with different household wastes (5%). Three experimental groups (T1, T2, and T3) were designed using mixing ratios of SO:CM:H2O:inoculum (5:22.5:22.5:50), FW:CM:H2O:inoculum (5:22.5:22.5:50), and (SO + FW):CM:H2O:inoculum (2.5 + 2.5:22.5:22.5:50). The digesters were set at 28-34 degrees C for 30 days for hydraulic retention time (HRT). Total viable count (TVC), Escherichia coli, and Salmonella spp. counts were determined using the spread plate technique. Results: The study revealed that the highest average cumulative biogas yield was achieved from T1 > T3 > T2, but the concentration of CH4 was found in T3 > T2 > T1. The biogas production between the three groups was statistically nonsignificant (p > 0.05) but the daily concentration of CH4 was found statistically significant (p < 0.05). The average concentration of CH4 and CO2 in biogas was found to be 30% and 68% for T1, 60% and 37% for T2, and 69% and 27% for T3. However, the H2S content was within the acceptable range. The bacterial load was decreased by 2-3 logs before and after AD, and this reduction was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The research found that the co-digestion of CM with combined household wastes increased the methane concentration in biogas.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 242
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste
    El-Mashad, Hamed M.
    Zhang, Ruihong
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (11) : 4021 - 4028
  • [2] Evaluation of Hydrogen and Methane Production from Co-digestion of Chicken Manure and Food Waste
    Yusof, Tengku Roslina Tuan
    Rahman, Nor'Aini Abdul
    Ariff, Arbakariya B.
    Man, Hasfalina Che
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2019, 28 (04): : 3003 - 3013
  • [3] Biogas production from chicken manure: Co-digestion with spent poppy straw
    Bayrakdar, Alper
    Molaey, Rahim
    Surmeli, Recep Onder
    Sahinkaya, Erkan
    Calli, Baris
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 2017, 119 : 205 - 210
  • [4] Co-digestion of food waste and dairy manure for biogas production
    El-Mashad, H. M.
    Zhang, R.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2007, 50 (05) : 1815 - 1822
  • [5] Co-digestion of Cattle Manure and Tea Waste for Biogas Production
    Aksay, Mehmet Volkan
    Ozkaymak, Mehmet
    Calhan, Rahman
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH, 2018, 8 (03): : 1346 - 1353
  • [6] Biogas production from co-digestion of different proportions of food waste and fresh bovine manure
    de Morais Andrade, Monaliza Mirella
    Alves Alencar, Barbara Ribeiro
    Leite, Nathalia Pereira
    Barbosa Firmo, Alessandra Lee
    Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano
    de Sa Barretto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares
    Cezar Menezes, Romulo Simoes
    [J]. BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2022, 12 (07) : 2697 - 2704
  • [7] Biogas production from co-digestion of different proportions of food waste and fresh bovine manure
    Monaliza Mirella de Morais Andrade
    Bárbara Ribeiro Alves Alencar
    Nathalia Pereira Leite
    Alessandra Lee Barbosa Firmo
    Emmanuel Damilano Dutra
    Everardo Valadares de Sá Barretto Sampaio
    Rômulo Simões Cezar Menezes
    [J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2022, 12 : 2697 - 2704
  • [8] BIOGAS PRODUCTION FROM CO-DIGESTION OF HORSE MANURE AND WASTE SEWAGE SLUDGE
    Agayev, Elvin
    Ugurlu, Aysenur
    [J]. NANOTECHNOLOGY 2011: BIO SENSORS, INSTRUMENTS, MEDICAL, ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY, NSTI-NANOTECH 2011, VOL 3, 2011, : 657 - 660
  • [9] BIOGAS PRODUCTION FROM CO-DIGESTION OF HORSE MANURE AND WASTE SEWAGE SLUDGE
    Agayev, Elvin
    Ugurlu, Aysenur
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGY 2011: BIOENERGY, RENEWABLES, STORAGE, GRID, WASTE AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, : 111 - 114
  • [10] Optimising biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and organic fraction of municipal solid waste
    Matheri, A. N.
    Ndiweni, S. N.
    Belaid, M.
    Muzenda, E.
    Hubert, R.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 80 : 756 - 764