A mixed methods evaluation of the impact of a cost-of-living policy and practice hub on integrated care strategies

被引:0
|
作者
Dunn, H. [1 ]
Lowe, R. [1 ]
Mahmood, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] NHS Confederat, London, England
关键词
Cost-of-living; Integrated care systems; Integrated care strategies; Resource hub; Wider determinants of health;
D O I
10.1016/j.puhe.2024.05.034
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: The cost-of-living crisis is a public health threat; however, the effects of the rising cost of living were not a policy priority for integrated care systems (ICSs) in early 2022. At the request of ICS leaders, the National Health Service (NHS) Confederation created an online cost-of-living hub in October 2022 to raise awareness of the consequences of the rising cost of living among ICS policymakers and support systems in mitigating these effects. This study aims to investigate the impact of this hub. Study design: Mixed methods. Methods: To quantify hub utilisation, the hub viewing figures collected by the NHS Confederation website were analysed. A thematic analysis was performed to characterise how cost-of-living features in integrated care strategies, and the results compared to information published on the hub. Results: The pages that comprise the hub were well engaged with, having between 2736 and 6161 views. Alongside this, the impacts of the rising cost of living feature extensively in integrated care strategies, being discussed in 32 out of 37 strategies across four contexts: health, communities, economic, and environmental. The signi ficant majority of subthemes re flect points made by the hub. Conclusion: These results suggest the hub may have raised awareness about the impacts of -and possible responses to -the cost-of-living crisis among ICS policymakers. This may act as an impetus and guide for future public health interventions using policy and practice hubs. Furthermore, the discussion of cost-ofliving across a range of contexts implies ICSs are engendering a collaborative, system-wide approach to tackling complex local issues. (c) 2024 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 36
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Washington State Practice Transformation Support Hub
    Kwan-Gett, Tao Sheng
    Albertson, Elaine Michelle
    Banks, Jordan
    Revere, Debra
    Rogers, Megan
    Baseman, Janet
    Andris, Lydia
    Conrad, Douglas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (05): : 484 - 491
  • [2] A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Northwest London Integrated Care Pilot
    Harris, Matthew
    Pappas, Yannis
    Mastellos, Nikolas
    Soljak, Michael
    Gunn, Laura
    Cecil, Elizabeth
    Greaves, Felix
    Car, Josip
    Majeed, Azeem
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2016, 16
  • [3] Effective Facilitator Strategies for Supporting Primary Care Practice Change: A Mixed Methods Study
    Sweeney, Shannon M.
    Baron, Andrea
    Hall, Jennifer D.
    -Herrera, David Ezekiel
    Springer, Rachel
    Ward, Rikki L.
    Marino, Miguel
    Balasubramanian, Bijal A.
    Cohen, Deborah J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2022, 20 (05) : 414 - 422
  • [4] Integrated care pilot in north-west London: a mixed methods evaluation
    Curry, Natasha
    Harris, Matthew
    Gunn, Laura H.
    Pappas, Yannis
    Blunt, Ian
    Soljak, Michael
    Mastellos, Nikolaos
    Holder, Holly
    Smith, Judith
    Majeed, Azeem
    Ignatowicz, Agnieszka
    Greaves, Felix
    Belsi, Athina
    Costin-Davis, Nicola
    Nielsen, Jessica D. Jones
    Greenfield, Geva
    Cecil, Elizabeth
    Patterson, Susan
    Car, Josip
    Bardsley, Martin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2013, 13
  • [5] Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study
    Nurjono, Milawaty
    Shrestha, Pami
    Lee, Alice
    Lim, Xin Ya
    Shiraz, Farah
    Tan, Shermin
    Wong, Shing Hei
    Foo, Kah Mun
    Wee, Thomas
    Toh, Sue-Anne
    Yoong, Joanne
    Vrijhoef, Hubertus Johannes Maria
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [6] Evaluation Strategies for Understanding Experiences With Virtual Care in Canada: Mixed Methods Study
    Vanderhout, Shelley
    Goldbloom, Ellen B.
    Li, Amy
    Newhook, Dennis
    Garcia, Meghan
    Dulude, Catherine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [7] Impact of Cancer Survivorship Care Training on Rural Primary Care Practice Teams: a Mixed Methods Approach
    Risendal, Betsy
    Westfall, John M.
    Zittleman, Linda
    Hodgson, Carol
    Garrington, Timothy
    Sutter, Christin
    Jarrell, Lori
    LeBlanc, William
    Overholser, Linda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2022, 37 (01) : 71 - 80
  • [8] Impact of Cancer Survivorship Care Training on Rural Primary Care Practice Teams: a Mixed Methods Approach
    Betsy Risendal
    John M. Westfall
    Linda Zittleman
    Carol Hodgson
    Timothy Garrington
    Christin Sutter
    Lori Jarrell
    William LeBlanc
    Linda Overholser
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Education, 2022, 37 : 71 - 80
  • [9] PROMs and PREMs in routine perinatal care: mixed methods evaluation of their implementation into integrated obstetric care networks
    Anne L. Depla
    Bettine Pluut
    Marije Lamain-de Ruiter
    Anna W. Kersten
    Inge M. Evers
    Arie Franx
    Mireille N. Bekker
    [J]. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 7
  • [10] PROMs and PREMs in routine perinatal care: mixed methods evaluation of their implementation into integrated obstetric care networks
    Depla, Anne L.
    Pluut, Bettine
    Lamain-de Ruiter, Marije
    Kersten, Anna W.
    Evers, Inge M.
    Franx, Arie
    Bekker, Mireille N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2023, 7 (01)