The mechanical, wear, antibacterial properties and biocompatibility of injectable restorative materials under wet challenge

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Yanning [1 ]
Bai, Xuedong [1 ]
Xu, Mengxiao [1 ]
Zhou, Tianyu [1 ]
Loh, Yee Man [2 ]
Wang, Chunjin [2 ]
Pow, Edmond Ho Nang [3 ]
Tsoi, James Kit Hon [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Dent, Dent Mat Sci Appl Oral Sci & Community Dent Care, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, State Key Lab Ultraprecis Machining Technol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Dent, Prosthodont, Restorat Dent Sci, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Prince Philip Dent Hosp, 1B18 34 Hosp Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY | 2024年 / 146卷
关键词
Injectable composite resin; Mechanical properties; Three -body wear; Biocompatibility; Antibacterial behaviour; FLOWABLE RESIN COMPOSITES; FLEXURAL PROPERTIES; DENTAL COMPOSITE; ELASTIC-MODULUS; IN-VIVO; STRENGTH; BEHAVIOR; FATIGUE; POLYMERIZATION; NANOHARDNESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105025
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the mechanical, wear, antibacterial properties, and biocompatibility of injectable composite materials. Methods: Two injectable composite resins (GU and BI), one flowable composite resin (FS), and one flowable compomer (DF), in A2 shade, were tested. Mechanical properties were tested via three-point bending test immediately after preparation and after 1-day, 7-day, 14-day, and 30-day water storage. Under water-PMMA slurry immersion, specimens were subjected to a 3-body wear test (10,000 cycles) against stainless steel balls, while the roughness, wear depth, and volume loss were recorded. After 1-day and 3-day MC3T3-E1 cell culture, cell viability was evaluated with CCK-8 test kits, while the cell morphology was observed under CLSM and SEM. Antibacterial properties on S. mutans were assessed via CFU counting, CLSM, and SEM observation. SPSS 26.0 was used for statistical analysis (alpha = 0.05). Results: The mechanical properties were material-dependent and sensitive to water storage. Flexural strength ranked GU > FS > BI > DF at all testing levels. Three nanocomposites had better wear properties than DF. No significant difference on 1-day cell viability was found, but DF showed significantly lower cell proliferation than nanocomposites on 3-day assessment. GU and FS had more favourable cell adhesion and morphology. CFU counting revealed no significant difference, while FS presented a slightly thicker biofilm and BI showed relatively lower bacteria density. Conclusions: Injectable nanocomposites outperformed the compomer regarding mechanical properties, wear resistance, and biocompatibility. The tested materials presented comparable antibacterial behaviours. Flowable resin-based composites' performances are affected by multiple factors, and their compositions can be attributed. Clinical Significance: A profound understanding of the mechanical, wear, and biological properties of the restorative material is imperative for the clinical success of dental restorations. The current study demonstrated superior properties of highly filled injectable composite resins, which imply their wider indications and better long-term clinical performances.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The chemical and optical stability evaluation of injectable restorative materials under wet challenge
    Bai, Xuedong
    Chen, Yanning
    Zhou, Tianyu
    Pow, Edmond Ho Nang
    Tsoi, James Kit Hon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 146
  • [2] Ion releasing direct restorative materials: Key mechanical properties and wear
    Daabash, Rawan
    Alshabib, Abdulrahman
    Alqahtani, Mohammed Q.
    Price, Richard Bengt
    Silikas, Nick
    Alshaafi, Maan M.
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 2022, 38 (12) : 1866 - 1877
  • [3] Mechanical properties and wear of restorative composites.
    Schultz, S.
    Rosentritt, M.
    Behr, M.
    Handel, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B60 - B60
  • [4] ANTIBACTERIAL PROPERTIES OF DENTAL RESTORATIVE MATERIALS - A REVIEW
    TOBIAS, RS
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1988, 21 (02) : 155 - 160
  • [5] THE ANTIBACTERIAL PROPERTIES OF SOME DENTAL RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
    MCCUE, RW
    MCDOUGAL, FG
    SHAY, DE
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1951, 4 (09): : 1180 - 1184
  • [6] Evaluation of physical-mechanical properties, antibacterial effect, and cytotoxicity of temporary restorative materials
    Peralta, Sonia Luque
    de Leles, Savio Bisinoto
    Dutra, Andre Lindemann
    da Silva Guimaraes, Victoria Burmann
    Piva, Evandro
    Lund, Rafael Guerra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2018, 26
  • [7] Mechanical properties of compomer restorative materials
    El-Kalla, IH
    García-Godoy, F
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 1999, 24 (01) : 2 - 8
  • [8] Wear properties and compressive strength under dynamic loading of direct restorative materials.
    Bojar, W
    Kobylecki, W
    Koczorowski, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 1281 - 1281
  • [9] A FURTHER STUDY OF THE ANTIBACTERIAL PROPERTIES OF DENTAL RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
    TOBIAS, RS
    RIPPIN, JW
    BROWNE, RM
    WILSON, CA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1988, 21 (06) : 381 - 392
  • [10] Nanomechanical properties and wear resistance of dental restorative materials
    Karimzadeh, A.
    Ayatollahi, Majid R.
    Nikkhooyifar, M.
    Bushroa, A. R.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2017, 64 (06) : 819 - 826