Ultrasoundhydrodistention in adhesivecapsulitis: Hospital versus home-based rehabilitation

被引:2
|
作者
Donati, Danilo [1 ,2 ]
Tedeschi, Roberto [3 ]
Spinnato, Paolo [4 ]
Pederiva, Davide [5 ]
Pilla, Federico [5 ]
Faldini, Cesare [5 ]
Benedetti, Maria Grazia [6 ]
Guerra, Enrico [7 ]
Cavallo, Marco [7 ]
Miceli, Marco [4 ]
Galletti, Stefano [8 ]
Vita, Fabio [5 ]
机构
[1] Policlin Modena, Phys Therapy & Rehabil Unit, Modena, Italy
[2] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Clin & Expt Med PhD Program, Modena, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy
[4] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
[5] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Orthopaed & Traumatol Clin 1, Bologna, Italy
[6] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Phys Med & Rehabil Unit, Bologna, Italy
[7] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Shoulder & Elbow Unit, I-40100 Bologna, Italy
[8] Italian Soc Ultrasound Med & Biol, Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Sch, Bologna, Italy
来源
EGYPTIAN RHEUMATOLOGIST | 2024年 / 46卷 / 04期
关键词
Adhesive capsulitis; Frozen shoulder; Ultrasound -guided hydrodistention; Rehabilitation treatment; Physiotherapy; ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS; SHOULDER; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejr.2024.06.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Adhesive capsulitis, or frozen shoulder, causes pain and reduces glenohumeral joint motion. Aim of the work: This study aims to assesses ultrasound-guided hydrodistention with rehabilitation in hospital versus home settings. Patients and methods: Forty patients with adhesive capsulitis were split into two groups: one received hydrodistention with hospital-assisted rehabilitation, and the other with home-based rehabilitation, following the same exercise protocol. Clinical assessments included range of motion (ROM), numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH), and assessment shoulder and elbow scale (ASES) Results: The hospital-based group showed more rapid and substantial improvements in ROM and NPRS scores compared to the home-based group. The hospital-based group had a mean flexion ROM of 104.3 +/- 31.6 degrees, which increased to 149.5 +/- 20.6 degrees at the final follow-up. The home-based group started with a mean flexion ROM of 103.3 +/- 29.2 degrees, improving to 161.3 +/- 23.2 degrees by the end of the study. Both groups showed significant improvements, with the home-based group slightly outperforming in flexion ROM by the third follow-up. Initial NPRS scores were 4.7 +/- 1.92 for the hospital-based group and 6.6 +/- 1.63 for the home-based group. By the six-month mark, the hospital-based group's SPADI score dropped to 17.4 +/- 19.5, while the home-based group's score was 10.5 +/- 13.03. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements, with the hospital-based group showing slightly better outcomes at various follow-ups. Conclusion: Hydrodistention combined with supervised rehabilitation is optimal for treating frozen shoulder, though home-based therapy is also effective. Both methods significantly benefit from hydrodistention, highlighting its importance in treatment strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 170
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Home-based cardiac rehabilitation versus hospital-based rehabilitation: A cost effectiveness analysis
    Taylor, R. S.
    Watt, A.
    Dalal, H. M.
    Evans, P. H.
    Campbell, J. L.
    Read, K. L. Q.
    Mourant, A. J.
    Wingham, Jenny
    Thompson, D. R.
    Gray, D. J. Pereira
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 119 (02) : 196 - 201
  • [2] Hospital-Based Versus Home-Based Program in Rehabilitation of Distal Radius Fractures
    Oken, Oznur
    Ceceli, Esma
    Oken, Fuad O.
    Yorgancioglu, Rezan Z.
    [J]. TURKIYE FIZIKSEL TIP VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 57 (03): : 139 - 142
  • [3] Comparable Program Delivery Time: Home-Based versus Hospital-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation
    Fletcher, Dana R.
    Martinez, Monica
    Durfee, Josh
    Hajoglou, Amanda
    Rice, Marina
    Orendain, Juan C.
    Gupta, Prerna
    Gritz, R. Mark
    Peterson, Pamela
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [4] Home-Based versus Hospital-Based Rehabilitation Program after Total Knee Replacement
    Lopez-Liria, Remedios
    Padilla-Gongora, David
    Catalan-Matamoros, Daniel
    Rocamora-Perez, Patricia
    Perez-de la Cruz, Sagrario
    Fernandez-Sanchez, Manuel
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [5] The role of clinical and geographic factors in the use of hospital versus home-based cardiac rehabilitation
    Brual, Janette
    Gravely, Shannon
    Suskin, Neville
    Stewart, Donna E.
    Grace, Sherry L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2012, 35 (03) : 220 - 226
  • [6] Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation
    Taylor, Rod S.
    Dalal, Hayes
    Jolly, Kate
    Zawada, Anna
    Dean, Sarah G.
    Cowie, Aynsley
    Norton, Rebecca J.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (08):
  • [7] Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation
    Anderson, Lindsey
    Sharp, Georgina A.
    Norton, Rebecca J.
    Dalal, Hasnain
    Dean, Sarah G.
    Jolly, Kate
    Cowie, Aynsley
    Zawada, Anna
    Taylor, Rod S.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (06):
  • [8] Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation
    Taylor, R. S.
    Dalal, H.
    Jolly, K.
    Moxham, T.
    Zawada, A.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (01):
  • [9] Home-based rehabilitation
    Guell, R.
    [J]. BREATHE, 2008, 5 (01) : 39 - 41
  • [10] A comparison of a hospital-based and two home-based rehabilitation programmes
    Dow, Briony
    Black, Kirsten
    Bremner, Fiona
    Fearn, Marcia
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2007, 29 (08) : 635 - 641