Digital orientation and analyst recommendations: Evidence from China

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Di [1 ]
Zhang, Xiao [2 ]
Wang, Jie [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Audit Univ, Sch Business, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ, Sch Business, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Taiyuan Univ Technol, Coll Econ & Management, Taiyuan, Shanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Digital orientation; Analyst recommendation; Industrial uncertainty; Industrial digital heterogeneity; Industrial growth; STOCK RECOMMENDATIONS; MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; SIGNALING THEORY; PERFORMANCE; UNCERTAINTY; INFORMATION; DIVERSITY; PRESTIGE; IMPACT; POWER;
D O I
10.1007/s10490-024-09976-y
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Because of information asymmetry in the capital market, analysts find it difficult to obtain accurate internal information of the enterprise and usually only rely on signals conveyed by firms to predict firms' value and future development trends. Previous researchers have focused more on the impact of signals about quality on analyst recommendations and ignored the impact of signals about intent. Based on signaling theory, we study how digital orientation, a typical signal about intent in the digital economy era, affects analyst recommendations; we also explore how three dimensions: dynamism, complexity, and munificence from a signaling environment perspective affect the signaling process. Using a mixed-methods approach and in the unique context of the Chinese digital economy, we find that the digital orientation can increase the analyst recommendations. Industrial uncertainty and industrial digital heterogeneity both strengthen the positive effect of digital orientation on analyst recommendations. On the contrary, industrial growth weakens the positive effect of digital orientation on analyst recommendations. This study provides new insights for understanding the transmission of firm signals about intent and the evaluation of external stakeholders in the era of the digital economy.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Value of analyst recommendations Evidence from the MENA region
    Farooq, Omar
    Ali, Latifa Id
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND MIDDLE EASTERN FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 7 (03) : 258 - 276
  • [2] Are analyst recommendations biased? Evidence from corporate bankruptcies
    Clarke, J
    Ferris, SP
    Jayaraman, N
    Lee, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2006, 41 (01) : 169 - 196
  • [3] Value of analyst recommendations: International evidence
    Jegadeesh, Narasimhan
    Kim, Woojin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2006, 9 (03) : 274 - 309
  • [4] Do Analyst Conflicts Matter? Evidence from Stock Recommendations
    Agrawal, Anup
    Chen, Mark A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2008, 51 (03): : 503 - 537
  • [5] Maturity mismatched investment, digital financial inclusion, and digital orientation: Evidence from China
    Xu, Meng
    Yang, Zhonghai
    Lin, Yu-En
    Li, Gaobo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 91
  • [6] Political incentives and analyst bias: Evidence from China
    Pittman, Jeffrey
    Yang, Zhifeng
    Yu, Sijia
    Zhu, Haoran
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2024, 41 (03) : 1695 - 1725
  • [7] Customer concentration and analyst following: Evidence from China
    Liu, Lingchen
    Gu, Yan
    Ho, Kung-Cheng
    Chang, Chiu-Lan
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2022, 43 (01) : 97 - 110
  • [8] Public attention and analyst visits: Evidence from China
    Zhang, Jian
    Qiao, Jun
    Wu, Wenruo
    Sheng, Yan
    Su, Jingqi
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2023, 79
  • [9] Can investors profit from security analyst recommendations?: New evidence on the value of consensus recommendations
    Park, Sung Jun
    Park, Ki Young
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 30 : 403 - 413
  • [10] When Is the Client King? Evidence from Affiliated-Analyst Recommendations in China's Split-Share Reform
    Chan, Kam C.
    Jiang, Xuanyu
    Wu, Donghui
    Xu, Nianhang
    Zeng, Hong
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2020, 37 (02) : 1044 - 1072