Can Generative AI improve social science?

被引:8
|
作者
Bail, Christopher A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Sociol, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Publ Policy, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
Generative AI; social science; agent-based model; survey research; algorithmic bias; BIAS;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.2314021121
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Generative AI that can produce realistic text, images, and other human-like outputs is currently transforming many different industries. Yet it is not yet known how such tools might influence social science research. I argue Generative AI has the potential to improve survey research, online experiments, automated content analyses, agent-based models, and other techniques commonly used to study human behavior. In the second section of this article, I discuss the many limitations of Generative AI. I examine how bias in the data used to train these tools can negatively impact social science research-as well as a range of other challenges related to ethics, replication, environmental impact, and the proliferation of low-quality research. I conclude by arguing that social scientists can address many of these limitations by creating open-source infrastructure for research on human behavior. Such infrastructure is not only necessary to ensure broad access to high-quality research tools, I argue, but also because the progress of AI will require deeper understanding of the social forces that guide human behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AI tools can improve equity in science
    Berdejo-Espinola, Violeta
    Amano, Tatsuya
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2023, 379 (6636) : 991 - 991
  • [2] Science communication with generative AI
    Amanda Alvarez
    Aylin Caliskan
    M. J. Crockett
    Shirley S. Ho
    Lisa Messeri
    Jevin West
    [J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2024, 8 : 625 - 627
  • [3] Science communication with generative AI
    Alvarez, Amanda
    Caliskan, Aylin
    Crockett, M. J.
    Ho, Shirley S.
    Messeri, Lisa
    West, Jevin
    [J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2024, 8 (4) : 625 - 627
  • [4] Tweetorial Hooks: Generative AI Tools to Motivate Science on Social Media
    Columbia University, New York
    NY, United States
    不详
    NY, United States
    [J]. arXiv,
  • [5] AI for social science and social science of AI: A survey
    Xu, Ruoxi
    Sun, Yingfei
    Ren, Mengjie
    Guo, Shiguang
    Pan, Ruotong
    Lin, Hongyu
    Sun, Le
    Han, Xianpei
    [J]. INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 61 (03)
  • [6] Can Generative AI Improve the Standardisation of Student Feedback Across a Business School Faculty?
    Holdcroft, Craig
    [J]. LEARNING TECHNOLOGY FOR EDUCATION CHALLENGES, LTEC 2024, 2024, 2082 : 364 - 376
  • [7] Can Generative AI Bots Be Trusted?
    Denning, Peter J.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2023, 66 (06) : 24 - 27
  • [8] How Social Science Research Can Improve Teaching
    King, Gary
    Sen, Maya
    [J]. PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2013, 46 (03) : 621 - 629
  • [9] Social Risks in the Era of Generative AI
    Liu, Xiaozhong
    Lin, Yu-Ru
    Jiang, Zhuoren
    Wu, Qunfang
    [J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2024, 61 (01) : 790 - 794
  • [10] Generative AI and science communication in the physical sciences
    Biyela, Sibusiso
    Dihal, Kanta
    Gero, Katy Ilonka
    Ippolito, Daphne
    Menczer, Filippo
    Schafer, Mike S.
    Yokoyama, Hiromi M.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS PHYSICS, 2024, 6 (03) : 162 - 165