Optimising the implementation of evidence-based osteoarthritis guidelines in primary care: Development of a Knowledge Mobilisation Toolkit

被引:0
|
作者
Swaithes, Laura [1 ]
Paskins, Zoe [1 ,2 ]
Finney, Andrew [3 ,4 ]
Walsh, Nicola [5 ]
Skrybant, Magdalena [6 ]
Mallen, Christian [7 ]
Dziedzic, Krysia [1 ]
机构
[1] Keele Univ, Sch Med, Impact Accelerator Unit, Versus Arthrit Primary Care Ctr, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[2] Haywood Hosp, Midlands Partnership NHS Fdn Trust, Haywood Acad Rheumatol Ctr, Stoke On Trent, Staffs, England
[3] Keele Univ, Versus Arthrit Primary Care Ctr, Sch Med, Impact Accelerator Unit, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[4] Keele Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[5] Univ West England, Ctr Hlth & Clin Res, Bristol, England
[6] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
[7] Keele Univ, Versus Arthrit Primary Care Ctr, Sch Med, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Implementation; Knowledge mobilisation; Osteoarthritis; Toolkit; Guidelines; Patient and public involvement; TRIANGULATION; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.joca.2024.01.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Implementing clinical guidelines for osteoarthritis (OA) in primary care is complex. Whilst international guidelines detail what best practice for OA looks like, little is known about how this is best implemented. Limited resources are available to guideline developers, practitioners, researchers, or the public to facilitate implementation. Set in the context of a larger research project which sought to understand the factors that influence knowledge mobilisation (KM) in implementation for OA guidelines, this study reports the development of a toolkit to optimise KM for the implementation of evidence-based OA guidelines in primary care. Design: Triangulation of three qualitative data sets was conducted, followed by a stakeholder consensus exercise. Public contributors were involved in dedicated meetings (n = 3) to inform the content, design, and KM plans for the toolkit. Results: From data triangulation, 53 key findings were identified, which were refined into 30 draft recommendation statements, within six domains: approaches to KM; the knowledge mobiliser role; understanding context; implementation planning; the nature of the intervention; and appealing to a range of priorities. Stakeholder voting (n = 27) demonstrated consensus with the recommendations and informed the wording of the final toolkit. Conclusions: Factors that optimise KM for OA guideline implementation in primary care were identified. Empirical data, practice-based evidence, implementation practice, and stakeholder (including patient and public) engagement have informed a toolkit comprising several overarching principles of KM, which are suitable for use in primary care. Consideration of equitable access when implementing evidence-based OA care among diverse populations is recommended when using the toolkit. Further research is needed to evaluate the toolkit's utility and transferability. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Osteoarthritis Research Society International. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
下载
收藏
页码:612 / 629
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and implementation of evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of depressive disorders in primary care
    Martin, H
    Bermejo, I
    Gaebel, W
    Berger, M
    Schneider, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 39 (5-6) : 467 - 467
  • [2] Factors influencing the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for osteoarthritis in primary care: A systematic review and thematic synthesis
    Swaithes, Laura
    Paskins, Zoe
    Dziedzic, Krysia
    Finney, Andrew
    MUSCULOSKELETAL CARE, 2020, 18 (02) : 101 - 110
  • [3] Evidence-based implementation of evidence-based guidelines
    Doherty, Steven
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2006, 19 (01) : 32 - +
  • [4] Evidence-based mouth care guidelines for children and young people: Development and implementation
    Gibson, Faith
    Glenny, Anne Marie
    Auld, Elizabeth
    Clarkson, Jan
    Coulson, Suzanne
    Craig, Jean
    Eden, Tim
    Khalid, Tasneem
    Pizer, Barry
    Worthington, Helen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2007, 11 (02) : 188 - 188
  • [5] Development of evidence-based guidelines and critical care nurses' knowledge of enteral feeding
    Bourgault, Annette M.
    Ipe, Laura
    Weaver, Joanne
    Swartz, Sally
    O'Dea, Patrick J.
    CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2007, 27 (04) : 17 - +
  • [6] Improving implementation of evidence-based prevention in primary care
    Mazza, Danielle
    Harris, Mark F.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2010, 193 (02) : 101 - 102
  • [7] DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVIDENCE-BASED SAFER OPIOID PRESCRIBING TOOLKIT FOR CLINICAL CARE
    Losman, E.
    Ngo, Q.
    Rooker, A.
    Roche, J.
    DeLaCruz, J.
    Moore, A.
    Walton, M. A.
    Cunningham, R.
    Carter, P. M.
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2020, 26 : A19 - A19
  • [8] The importance of evidence-based supportive care practice guidelines in childhood cancer—a plea for their development and implementation
    E. A. H. Loeffen
    L. C. M. Kremer
    R. L. Mulder
    A. Font-Gonzalez
    L. L. Dupuis
    L. Sung
    P. D. Robinson
    M. D. van de Wetering
    W. J. E. Tissing
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017, 25 : 1121 - 1125
  • [9] Addressing Burnout in the Primary Care Setting: The Impact of an Evidence-Based Mindfulness Toolkit
    Christensen, Andrew J.
    Virnig, Jonathan P.
    Case, Nicole L.
    Hayes, Stephanie S.
    Heyne, Rebecca
    Taylor, Laura A.
    Allen, Micheal P.
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2023, 189 : 64 - 70
  • [10] Is evidence-based implementation of evidence-based care possible?
    Grimshaw, JM
    Eccles, MP
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2004, 180 (06) : S50 - S51