Determining the time before or after a galaxy merger event

被引:2
|
作者
Pearson, W. J. [1 ]
Rodriguez-Gomez, V. [2 ]
Kruk, S. [3 ]
Margalef-Bentabol, B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Nucl Res, Pasteura 7, PL-02093 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Radioastron & Astrofis, Apdo Postal 3-72, Morelia 58089, Mexico
[3] European Space Agcy ESA, European Space Astron Ctr ESAC, Camino Bajo Castillo S-N, E-28692 Villanueva De La Canada, Madrid, Spain
[4] SRON Netherlands Inst Space Res, Landleven 12, NL-9747 AD Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
methods: numerical; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: interactions; galaxies: statistics; galaxies: structure; ILLUSTRISTNG SIMULATIONS; STAR-FORMATION; CLOSE PAIRS; INTERACTING GALAXIES; MERGING GALAXIES; EVOLUTION; MORPHOLOGIES; MASS; IDENTIFICATION; SEPARATIONS;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/202449532
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Aims. This work aims to reproduce the time before or after a merger event of merging galaxies from the IllustrisTNG cosmological simulation using machine learning. Methods. Images of merging galaxies were created in the u, g, r, and i bands from IllustrisTNG. The merger times were determined using the time difference between the last simulation snapshot where the merging galaxies were tracked as two galaxies and the first snapshot where the merging galaxies were tracked as a single galaxy. This time was then further refined using simple gravity simulations. These data were then used to train a residual network (ResNet50), a Swin Transformer (Swin), a convolutional neural network (CNN), and an autoencoder (using a single latent neuron) to reproduce the merger time. The full latent space of the autoencoder was also studied to see if it reproduces the merger time better than the other methods. This was done by reducing the latent space dimensions using Isomap, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), neighbourhood components analysis, sparse random projection, truncated singular value decomposition, and uniform manifold approximation and projection. Results. The CNN is the best of all the neural networks. The performance of the autoencoder was close to the CNN, with Swin close behind the autoencoder. ResNet50 performed the worst. The LDA dimensionality reduction performed the best of the six methods used. The exploration of the full latent space produced worse results than the single latent neuron of the autoencoder. For the test data set, we found a median error of 190 Myr, comparable to the time separation between snapshots in IllustrisTNG. Galaxies more than approximate to 625 Myr before a merger have poorly recovered merger times, as well as galaxies more than approximate to 125 Myr after a merger event.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tidal disruption event rates in galaxy merger remnants
    Pfister, Hugo
    Bar-Or, Ben
    Volonteri, Marta
    Dubois, Yohan
    Capelo, Pedro R.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 488 (01) : L29 - L34
  • [2] Company performance before and after a merger
    Beverly, C.
    Sutejo, B. S.
    Murhadi, W. R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MANAGEMENT (INSYMA 2019), 2019, 308 : 28 - 31
  • [3] Modelling galaxy merger time-scales and tidal destruction
    Simha, Vimal
    Cole, Shaun
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 472 (02) : 1392 - 1400
  • [4] Early galaxy merger
    Bowler, Sue
    ASTRONOMY & GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 65 (04) : 6 - 6
  • [5] A dust-enshrouded tidal disruption event with a resolved radio jet in a galaxy merger
    Mattila, S.
    Perez-Torres, M.
    Efstathiou, A.
    Mimica, P.
    Fraser, M.
    Kankare, E.
    Alberdi, A.
    Aloy, M. A.
    Heikkila, T.
    Jonker, P. G.
    Lundqvist, P.
    Marti-Vidal, I.
    Meikle, W. P. S.
    Romero-Canizales, C.
    Smartt, S. J.
    Tsygankov, S.
    Varenius, E.
    Alonso-Herrero, A.
    Bondi, M.
    Fransson, C.
    Herrero-Illana, R.
    Kangas, T.
    Kotak, R.
    Ramirez-Olivencia, N.
    Vaisanen, P.
    Beswick, R. J.
    Clements, D. L.
    Greimel, R.
    Harmanen, J.
    Kotilainen, J.
    Nandra, K.
    Reynolds, T.
    Ryder, S.
    Walton, N. A.
    Wiik, K.
    Ostlin, G.
    SCIENCE, 2018, 361 (6401) : 482 - 485
  • [6] Formation of a polar ring galaxy in a galaxy merger
    Bekki, K
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 499 (02): : 635 - 649
  • [7] Massive merger at the heart of the galaxy
    不详
    ASTRONOMY & GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 65 (06) : 7 - 7
  • [8] MERGER RATES AND GALAXY FORMATION
    CHATTERJEE, TK
    IAU SYMPOSIA, 1991, (146): : 377 - 378
  • [9] NGC 3310, a galaxy merger?
    Kregel, M
    Sancisi, R
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2001, 376 (01) : 59 - 68
  • [10] CAPTURE DATA BEFORE, AFTER EVENT
    KHALSA, NS
    ELECTRONIC DESIGN, 1991, 39 (01) : 176 - 177