Thirty-day outcomes of carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients: a propensity score-matched analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Bramucci, Alberto [1 ]
Nerla, Roberto [2 ,3 ]
Massoni, Claudio Bianchini [1 ]
Giovannini, Davide [2 ,3 ]
Chester, Johanna [3 ]
Freyrie, Antonio [1 ]
Castriota, Fausto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Dept Med & Surg, 14 via Gramsci, I-43126 Parma, Italy
[2] Maria Cecilia Hosp, Intervent Cardiol Unit, GVM Care & Res, Cotignola, Italy
[3] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Med & Dent Dept Morphol Sci related Transplant, Res Unit, Surg Oncol & Regenerat Med, Modena, Italy
关键词
carotid and super-aortic disease; carotid stenting; cerebral protection; miscellaneous; stroke; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; STENOSIS; TRIAL; SURGERY; STROKE; RISK;
D O I
10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00624
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Technological and surgical approaches to carotid artery stenting (CAS) have evolved. Modern randomised controlled trials comparing CAS and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are limited, and information about updated post-intervention outcomes are mostly from retrospective, small studies. AIMS: This study aims to compare the 30-day outcomes of stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and death with propensity-matched groups of CEA and CAS in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients over a recent study period of new CAS technologies and approaches. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, multicentre analysis was conducted including consecutive symptomatic and asymptomatic patients treated with either primary CEA or CAS for internal carotid artery stenosis, between 2015 and 2022. Patients were propensity score-matched based on comorbidities and assessed according to symptom status. Primary endpoints include composite ipsilateral stroke, TIA, AMI and death within 30 days. Secondary endpoints include technical success and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: From a cohort of 1,110 patients, propensity matching produced 269 distinct treatment pairs (n=538). Most patients were asymptomatic (n=456, 85%). All 6 strokes were minor (CEA=2; CAS=4) and registered among asymptomatic patients. One AMI (CEA) and 1 patient death (CAS) were reported among symptomatic patients. Composite stroke/AMI/death were not significantly different between both types of symptom status and both revascularisation techniques (p=0.44 and p=1, respectively). Technical success was 100%. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in asymptomatic patients treated with CAS compared to those treated with CEA (p=0.05), but no difference was registered among symptomatic patients (p=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Propensity-matched analysis suggests that CAS has similar postprocedural outcomes for stroke, AMI and death at 30 days compared to CEA.
引用
收藏
页码:e445 / e452
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thirty-day Readmission Rates for Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Artery Stenting
    Hintze, Aidan J.
    Greenleaf, Erin K.
    Schilling, Amber L.
    Hollenbeak, Christopher S.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 235 : 270 - 279
  • [2] THIRTY-DAY READMISSION RATES OF CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY VERSUS CAROTID ARTERY STENTING: A NATIONWIDE ANALYSIS
    Atti, Varunsiri
    Edla, Sushruth
    Kumar, Varun
    Tripathi, Byomesh
    Patel, Nileshkumar
    Mujer, Mark Terence
    Yandrapalli, Srikanth
    Nalluri, Nikhil
    Venkata, Vikramaditya Samala
    Neupane, Saroj
    Rosman, Howard
    Mehta, Rajendra
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 1139 - 1139
  • [3] Comparison Of Carotid Endarterectomy And Carotid Artery Stenting On Asymptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Of Japanese Male: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis
    Nishimura, Kunihiro
    Nishimura, Ataru
    Kurogi, Ryota
    Kamitani, Satoru
    Kada, Akiko
    Sayama, Tetsuro
    Iihara, Koji
    STROKE, 2015, 46
  • [4] Propensity score-matched analysis of 1-year outcomes of transcarotid revascularization with dynamic flow reversal, carotid endarterectomy, and transfemoral carotid artery stenting
    Malas, Mahmoud B.
    Elsayed, Nadin
    Naazie, Isaac
    Dakour-Aridi, Hanaa
    Yei, Kevin S.
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (01) : 213 - +
  • [5] OUTCOMES OF CAROTID ARTERY STENTING VERSUS CAROTID ARTERY ENDARTERECTOMY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE CAROTID ARTERY REVASCULARIZATION: A PROPENSITY MATCHED ANALYSIS FROM THE NATIONAL INPATIENT SAMPLE
    Fugar, Setri
    Okoh, Alexis
    Solomon, Alfred
    Ozturk, Ebru
    Dave, Devanji
    Poulin, Marie-France
    Volgman, Annabelle
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 1323 - 1323
  • [6] Early Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis
    Sastry, Rahul A.
    Pertsch, Nathan J.
    Sagaityte, Emilija
    Poggi, Jonathan A.
    Toms, Steven A.
    Weil, Robert J.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 89 (04) : 653 - 663
  • [7] Early Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis
    Sastry, Rahul A.
    Pertsch, Nathan J.
    Sagaityte, Emilija
    Poggi, Jonathan A.
    Toms, Steven A.
    Weil, Robert J.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 91 (01) : E16 - E17
  • [8] Thirty-Day Neurologic Improvement Associated with Early versus Delayed Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients
    Chisci, Emiliano
    Pigozzi, Clara
    Troisi, Nicola
    Tramacere, Luciana
    Zaccara, Gaetano
    Cincotta, Massimo
    Ercolini, Leonardo
    Michelagnoli, Stefano
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 29 (03) : 435 - 442
  • [9] Letter: Early Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis
    Ansari, Darius
    Shah, Pal
    Mehta, Ankit I.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 91 (01) : E13 - E15
  • [10] Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xuefeng Kan
    Yong Wang
    Bin Xiong
    Bin Liang
    Guofeng Zhou
    Huimin Liang
    Chuansheng Zheng
    Journal of Interventional Medicine, 2018, 1 (01) : 42 - 48