Comparison of muscle energy technique and facet joint mobilisation in the patient with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial

被引:2
|
作者
Tabassum, Huma [1 ]
Mariam, Misbah [2 ]
Gondal, Kirran Sikandar [3 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Aid Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Islamabad, Pakistan
[2] Inst Hlth & Management Sci, Islamabad, Pakistan
[3] Univ Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Lahore, Pakistan
关键词
Cervical lordosis; Facet joint; Mobilisation; Muscle energy techniques; Neck pain; CERVICAL MANIPULATION; TRACTION; LORDOSIS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.47391/JPMA.9206
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the effects of muscle energy techniques, facet joint mobilisation and conventional physical therapy on pain, disability, cervical lordosis and range of motion in patients with chronic neck pain. Method: The parallel -design randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Department of the Heavy Industries Taxila Hospital, Taxila Cantt, Pakistan, from December 2020 to May 2021, and comprised patients of either gender aged 35-50 years who had chronic neck pain, recurrent neck pain, and cervical spine curve. The participants were randomised into muscle energy techniques group A, facet joint mobilisation group B and conventional physical therapy group C. The outcome measures were cervical lordosis, pain intensity, neck disability index and cervical range of motions. Data was analysed using SPSS 21. Results: Of the 115 patients initially assessed, 105(91.3%) were included; 67(63.8%) females and 38(36.2%) males. There were 35(33.3%) subjects in group A with mean age 40.09 +/- 4.29 years, 35(33.3%) in group B with mean age 40.14 +/- 4.57 years and 35(33.3%) in group C with men age 39.26 +/- 5.19 years. There were no significant differences among the groups at baseline in terms of mean age, weight, height, body mass index, neck disability index, cervical lordosis and range of motion (p>0.05). Of the total, 6(5.7%) were lost to follow-up and the study was completed by 99(94.3%) subjects. Outcome variables in group A were superior to those in groups B and C with respect to flexion, rotation and side -bending (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between groups A and B related to numeric pain rating scale and neck disability index (p>0.05). Conclusion: Muscle energy techniques and facet joint mobilisation showed significant improvement in neck pain, disability and cervical range of motions compared to conventional physical therapy. Muscle energy techniques and facet joint mobilisation produced similar outcomes with respect to pain intensity and functional disability.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 15
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cervicothoracic junction mobilization versus autogenic muscle energy technique for chronic mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial
    Abbas, Hoda I.
    Kamel, Ragia M.
    Shafei, Ayman E.
    Mahmoud, Mayada A.
    Lasheen, Yasser R.
    JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY, 2025, 33 (01) : 36 - 46
  • [2] Effects of muscle specific as compared to movement specific muscle energy technique in mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial
    Osama, Muhammad
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2023, 37 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [3] Active neck muscle training in the treatment of chronic neck pain in women -: A randomized controlled trial
    Ylinen, J
    Takala, EP
    Nykänen, M
    Häkkinen, A
    Mälkiä, E
    Pohjolainen, T
    Karppi, SL
    Kautiainen, H
    Airaksinen, O
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (19): : 2509 - 2516
  • [4] Comparison of Endoscopic Facet Joint Denervation to the Percutaneous Technique Regarding Efficacy in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Woiciechowsky, Christian
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (17) : 1187 - 1193
  • [5] Effect of muscle energy technique and static stretching on pain and functional disability in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial
    Phadke, Apoorva
    Bedekar, Nilima
    Shyam, Ashok
    Sancheti, Parag
    HONG KONG PHYSIOTHERAPY JOURNAL, 2016, 35 : 5 - 11
  • [6] The effects of neck mobilization in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial
    Farooq, Muhammad Nazim
    Mohseni-Bandpei, Mohammad A.
    Gilani, Syed Amir
    Ashfaq, Muhammad
    Mahmood, Qamar
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2018, 22 (01) : 24 - 31
  • [7] Patient-oriented rehabilitation in the management of chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial
    Paoloni, M.
    Tavernese, E.
    Cacchio, A.
    Tattoli, M.
    Melis, L.
    Ronconi, R.
    Santilli, V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2013, 49 (03) : 273 - 281
  • [8] A comparative study of Thai massage and muscle energy technique for chronic neck pain: A single-blinded randomized clinical trial
    Buttagat, Vitsarut
    Muenpan, Kanokwan
    Wiriyasakunphan, Witawit
    Pomsuwan, Saowalak
    Kluayhomthong, Sujittra
    Areeudomwong, Pattanasin
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2021, 27 : 647 - 653
  • [9] Radiofrequency Denervation on Lumbar Facet Joint Pain in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Trial
    Chen, Yu Si
    Liu, Botao
    Gu, Fang
    Sima, Lei
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2022, 25 (08) : 569 - 576
  • [10] Efficacy of the Alexander Technique in treating chronic non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial
    Lauche, Romy
    Schuth, Mareike
    Schwickert, Myriam
    Luedtke, Rainer
    Musial, Frauke
    Michalsen, Andreas
    Dobos, Gustav
    Choi, Kyung-Eun
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2016, 30 (03) : 247 - 258