Digital contact tracing technology in the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Irwin, Nicole [1 ]
Aisyah, Dewi Nur [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rahman, Fauziah Mauly [2 ]
Manikam, Logan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Epidemiol & Hlth Care, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, 1-19 Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7HB, England
[2] Minist Hlth Republ Indonesia, Digital Transformat Off, Jalan HR Rasuna Said Blok X5 Kav 4-9, South Jakarta 12950, Indonesia
[3] Aceso Global Hlth Consultants Pte Ltd, 10 Anson Rd,32-01, Singapore 079903, Singapore
关键词
Digital contact tracing; Mobile application; COVID-19; Pandemic; Technology; APPS;
D O I
10.1007/s12553-024-00857-4
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic prompted public health teams across the world to emphasize case identification, contact tracing, and isolation in outbreak management strategies. Contact tracing was advanced by global access to mobile phones to develop and implement digital contact tracing (DCT) technology with the objective of increasing the rate of contact tracing while reducing the resources required.Purpose This study aimed to describe the DCT technology used during the COVID-19 pandemic across the world, and to identify differences and similarities between characteristics and uses.Methods This review followed the PRISMA (2020) guidelines for systematic reviews. Literature searches were conducted using Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed and were restricted to English studies published between 2019 to 2023. Studies were excluded if they did not report findings for DCT during COVID-19, did not provide data for technology characteristics or outcomes, or were a study design listed for exclusion.Results Sixty one studies were included in the review producing results for 147 digital contact tracing technologies across 83 countries. The majority of digital contact tracing (DCT) technologies are government-owned (75.6%), primarily developed for COVID-19 tracing (96.4%). Bluetooth is the most favored technology (70%) used in their development, followed by GPS (30%) and QR codes (22%). Applications are the preferred platform (90.9%), with a few using applets (6.3%) and wearable devices (1.4%). Only 2 DCT technologies have achieved over 100 million downloads or uses (3.1%). Most DCTs fall into the 1-9.99 million downloads range (27.7%) and 10,000-99,999 downloads (20%). The majority of DCTs are voluntarily used by the population (63.6%), while 27.3% are mandated for use.Conclusions Digital contact tracing technologies were developed and implemented globally as a strategy in emergency outbreak management to reduce the spread of disease. This review describes the use of DCT across the world by identifying key features and characteristics that will serve as a lesson learned for improvement of existing DCT technologies for other emergency response outbreak management.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use and effectiveness of Digital Contact Tracing during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
    Pegollo, L.
    Mazza, C.
    Girardi, D.
    Maggioni, E.
    Valente, G.
    Gaeta, M.
    Odone, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 31
  • [2] Digital Contact Tracing Applications against COVID-19: A Systematic Review
    Nabeel, Ahmad
    Al-Sabah, Salman K.
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    [J]. MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2022, 31 (05) : 424 - 432
  • [3] Digital contact tracing, community uptake, and proximity awareness technology to fight COVID-19: a systematic review
    Grekousis, George
    Liu, Ye
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 71
  • [4] Comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
    Francisco Pozo-Martin
    Miguel Angel Beltran Sanchez
    Sophie Alice Müller
    Viorela Diaconu
    Kilian Weil
    Charbel El Bcheraoui
    [J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2023, 38 : 243 - 266
  • [5] Comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
    Pozo-Martin, Francisco
    Beltran Sanchez, Miguel Angel
    Muller, Sophie Alice
    Diaconu, Viorela
    Weil, Kilian
    El Bcheraoui, Charbel
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 38 (03) : 243 - 266
  • [6] Digital contact tracing for COVID-19
    Kleinman, Robert A.
    Merkel, Colin
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2020, 192 (24) : E653 - E656
  • [7] Factors affecting adoption of digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a literature review
    Yeo, Victoria Anna
    Mi, Yuqi
    Kwok, Kei Tung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND EMERGENCY, 2022, 6
  • [8] A systematic review of real-world contact tracing strategies at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic
    Rosso, A.
    Amicosante, A. M. V.
    Mattioli, I.
    Bernardini, F.
    Guglielmi, E.
    Eugeni, E.
    Baglio, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33
  • [9] COVID-19 Fight Enlists Digital Technology: Contact Tracing Apps
    Leslie, Mitch
    [J]. ENGINEERING, 2020, 6 (10) : 1064 - 1066
  • [10] Regulating emerging technology in times of crisis: Digital contact tracing in Norway during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Lund-Tonnesen, Jonas
    [J]. LAW & POLICY, 2022, 44 (03) : 278 - 298