Socioeconomic inequalities in skilled attendance at birth and caesarean section rates in Myanmar 2015-2016: a cross-sectional study

被引:0
|
作者
Show, Kyaw Lwin [1 ]
Maung, Thae Maung [1 ]
Disney, George [2 ]
Bohren, Meghan A. [3 ]
Lumbiganon, Pisake [4 ]
Ngamjarus, Chetta [5 ]
机构
[1] Minist Hlth, Dept Med Res, Yangon, Myanmar
[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Equ, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Nossal Inst Global Hlth, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Gender & Womens Hlth Unit, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[4] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[5] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Khon Kaen, Thailand
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 03期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Health Equity; PUBLIC HEALTH; REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE; MATERNAL MORTALITY; HEALTH; WOMEN; CARE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076646
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aims to assess inequalities in skilled birth attendance and utilisation of caesarean section (CS) in Myanmar.Study design Cross-sectional study design.Setting and population We used secondary data from the Myanmar Demographic and Health Survey (2015-2016). Our outcome measures of skilled birth attendance and utilisation of CS were taken from the most recent birth of interviewed women. Absolute and relative inequalities across several sociodemographic characteristics were assessed and evaluated by calculating rate differences, rate ratio and concentration indexes.Results More than one-third (36%, 95% CI 32.5% to 39.4%) of women gave birth without a skilled birth attendant present at their most recent birth. 40.7% (95% CI 37.8% to 43.7%) gave birth in healthcare facilities, and the CS rate was 19.7% (95% CI 17.9% to 21.8%) for their most recent birth. The highest proportion of birth without a skilled provider was found in the hilly regions and rural residents, poorest and less educated women, and those with less than four antenatal care visits. Inequalities in birth without a skilled provider were observed across regions, place of residence, wealth quintile, education level and number of antenatal care taken. The highest rate of CS was found among plain regions and urban residents, richest women, more than secondary education, those with more than four antenatal care visits and in private health facilities. Inequalities in CS utilisation were observed across place of residence, wealth quintiles, education level, number of antenatal care taken and type of health facilities.Conclusion This study provides evidence regarding inequalities in maternal health service utilisation in Myanmar. Increasing maternal health service availability and accessibility, promoting quality of care and health education campaigns to increase maternal health services utilisation are recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of caesarean section delivery in Ghana: a cross-sectional study using nationally representative data
    Emmanuel Dankwah
    Shelley Kirychuk
    Wu Zeng
    Cindy Feng
    Marwa Farag
    [J]. International Journal for Equity in Health, 18
  • [2] Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of caesarean section delivery in Ghana: a cross-sectional study using nationally representative data
    Dankwah, Emmanuel
    Kirychuk, Shelley
    Zeng, Wu
    Feng, Cindy
    Farag, Marwa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2019, 18 (01)
  • [3] Utilisation of skilled birth attendance in Northern Nigeria: A cross-sectional survey
    Adewemimo, Adeyinka W.
    Msuya, Sia E.
    Olaniyan, Christine T.
    Adegoke, Adetoro A.
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2014, 30 (01) : E7 - E13
  • [4] Observed trends in the magnitude of socioeconomic and area-based inequalities in use of caesarean section in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
    Gebretsadik Shibre
    Dina Idriss-Wheeler
    Ghose Bishwajit
    Sanni Yaya
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 20
  • [5] Observed trends in the magnitude of socioeconomic and area-based inequalities in use of caesarean section in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
    Shibre, Gebretsadik
    Idriss-Wheeler, Dina
    Bishwajit, Ghose
    Yaya, Sanni
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [6] Caesarean birth rates in public and privately funded hospitals: a cross-sectional study
    Alonso, Bruna Dias
    Barbosa da Silva, Flora Maria
    Dias de Oliveira Latorre, Maria do Rosario
    Grilo Diniz, Carmen Simone
    Bick, Debra
    [J]. REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2017, 51
  • [7] Predictors of caesarean section - a cross-sectional study in Hungary
    Shams-Beyranvand, Mehran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (12): : 2134 - 2134
  • [8] Predictors of caesarean section - a cross-sectional study in Hungary
    Renes, Lorand
    Barka, Nikoletta
    Gyurkovits, Zita
    Paulik, Edit
    Nemeth, Gabor
    Orvos, Hajnalka
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2018, 31 (03): : 320 - 324
  • [9] Socioeconomic health inequalities in Latvia: a cross-sectional study
    Monden, CWS
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 32 (03) : 217 - 223
  • [10] A global reference for caesarean section rates (C-Model): a multicountry cross-sectional study
    Souza, J. P.
    Betran, A. P.
    Dumont, A.
    de Mucio, B.
    Pickens, C. M. Gibbs
    Deneux-Tharaux, C.
    Ortiz-Panozo, E.
    Sullivan, E.
    Ota, E.
    Togoobaatar, G.
    Carroli, G.
    Knight, H.
    Zhang, J.
    Cecatti, J. G.
    Vogel, J. P.
    Jayaratne, K.
    Leal, M. C.
    Gissler, M.
    Morisaki, N.
    Lack, N.
    Oladapo, O. T.
    Tuncalp, O.
    Lumbiganon, P.
    Mori, R.
    Quintana, S.
    Passos, A. D. Costa
    Marcolin, A. C.
    Zongo, A.
    Blondel, B.
    Hernandez, B.
    Hogue, C. J.
    Prunet, C.
    Landman, C.
    Ochir, C.
    Cuesta, C.
    Pileggi-Castro, C.
    Walker, D.
    Alves, D.
    Abalos, E.
    Moises, E. C. D.
    Vieira, E. M.
    Duarte, G.
    Perdona, G.
    Gurol-Urganci, I.
    Takahiko, K.
    Moscovici, L.
    Campodonico, L.
    Oliveira-Ciabati, L.
    Laopaiboon, M.
    Danansuriya, M.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (03) : 427 - 436