Improvement of Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance Consensus Algorithm Based on DIANA in Intellectual Property Environment Transactions

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Jing [1 ]
Feng, Wenlong [1 ]
Huang, Mengxing [1 ]
Feng, Siling [1 ]
Du, Dan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hainan Univ, Sch Informat & Commun Engn, Haikou 570228, Hainan, Peoples R China
关键词
blockchain; intellectual property transactions; consensual algorithm; PBFT algorithm; DIANA hierarchical clustering;
D O I
10.3390/electronics13091634
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In response to the shortcomings of the consensus algorithm for intellectual property transactions, such as high communication overhead, random primary node selection, and prolonged consensus time, a Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) improvement algorithm based on Divisive Analysis (DIANA) D-PBFT algorithm is proposed. Firstly, the algorithm adopts the hierarchical clustering mechanism of DIANA to cluster nodes based on similarity, enhancing node partition accuracy and reducing the number of participating consensus nodes. Secondly, it designs a reward and punishment system based on node ranking, to achieve consistency between node status and permissions, timely evaluation, and feedback on node behaviours, thereby enhancing node enthusiasm. Then, the election method of the primary node is improved by constructing proxy and alternate nodes and adopting a majority voting strategy to achieve the selection and reliability of the primary node. Finally, the consistency protocol is optimised to perform consensus once within the cluster and once between all primary nodes, to ensure the accuracy of the consensus results. Experimental results demonstrate that the D-PBFT algorithm shows a better performance, in terms of communication complexity, throughput, and latency.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimization Scheme of Consensus Mechanism Based on Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance Algorithm
    Gao, Zhipeng
    Yang, Lulin
    BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATION: SECOND CCF CHINA BLOCKCHAIN CONFERENCE (CBCC 2019), 2020, 1176 : 187 - 195
  • [2] A Group-Based Optimized Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance Consensus Algorithm
    Bao, Zhenshan
    Liu, Yue
    Zhang, Wenbo
    BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATION, CBCC 2020, 2021, 1305 : 95 - 115
  • [3] Grouped Multilayer Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance Algorithm: A Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance Consensus Algorithm Optimized for Digital Asset Trading Scenarios
    Liu, Jian
    Feng, Wenlong
    Huang, Mengxing
    Feng, Siling
    Zhang, Yu
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (21)
  • [4] Byzantine Fault-Tolerance Consensus Algorithm Based on
    Li, Shuzhi
    Xiong, Weizhi
    Deng, Xiaohong
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    Liu, Hunwen
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 45 (07) : 2484 - 2493
  • [5] QPBFT: Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance Consensus Algorithm Based on Quantified-role
    Zhang, Zhujun
    Zhu, Dali
    Fan, Wei
    2020 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRUST, SECURITY AND PRIVACY IN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS (TRUSTCOM 2020), 2020, : 992 - 998
  • [6] Improvement of Hierarchical Byzantine Fault Tolerance Algorithm in RAFT Consensus Algorithm Election
    Zhan, Zhuofan
    Huang, Ruwei
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (16):
  • [7] Practical Byzantine fault tolerance consensus based on comprehensive reputation
    Qi, Jiamou
    Guan, Yepeng
    PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 16 (01) : 420 - 430
  • [8] Practical Byzantine fault tolerance consensus based on comprehensive reputation
    Jiamou Qi
    Yepeng Guan
    Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 2023, 16 : 420 - 430
  • [9] Research on Consensus Efficiency Based on Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance
    Zhang, Li
    Li, Qinwei
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELLING, IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL (ICMIC), 2018,
  • [10] LRBFT: Improvement of practical Byzantine fault tolerance consensus protocol for blockchains based on Lagrange interpolation
    Zhen-Fei Wang
    Yong-Wang Ren
    Zhong-Ya Cao
    Li-Ying Zhang
    Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 2023, 16 : 690 - 708