A comparative life cycle assessment of building sustainability across typical European building geometries

被引:0
|
作者
Spudys, Paulius [1 ]
Osadcha, Iryna [1 ]
Morkunaite, Lina [1 ]
Manhanga, Fallon Clare [1 ]
Georgali, Phoebe Zoe [2 ]
Klumbyte, Egle [1 ]
Jurelionis, Andrius [1 ]
Papadopoulos, Agis [3 ]
Fokaides, Paris [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kaunas Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Architecture, Kaunas, Lithuania
[2] Frederick Univ, Sch Engn, Limassol, Cyprus
[3] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Mech Engn, Proc Equipment Design Lab, Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
Life cycle assessment (LCA); Comparative assessment; Typical building geometries; Embodied energy; Cost -optimal minimum thermal performance; Environmental product declarations (EPDs); PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2024.131693
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, significant progress has been made in the sustainability assessment of building materials and buildings. The introduction of Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), the development of Level(s), and the release of relevant series of standards have helped to improve the sustainability of buildings. However, a research question that remains unresolved is the lack of information related to the comparison of the sustainability performance of building units across Europe and the significance of conducting such research. This study addressed this question by implementing a comparative whole-building Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) across buildings in Europe. The study emphasizes the necessity of considering typical building geometries and thermal performance of buildings across Europe and introduces six typical building geometries for three different European clusters (northern-western, central-eastern, southern cluster). The results of this study revealed that the sustainability performance of buildings is not similar across the EU and that cost-optimal minimum thermal performance requirements for building structures have a significant impact on their environmental performance. Particularly, single-family houses in Central and Eastern Europe are responsible for 324.42 kgCO2e/m2. Contrary to this, Northern and Western European single-family buildings have the lowest environmental impact with 268.97 kgCO2e/m2. Multifamily houses in Southern Europe are responsible for 321.82 kgCO2e/m2, in Northern and Western Europe the environmental impact is 275.37 kgCO2e/m2. The outcome of this study is significant for the scientific community involved in assessing the sustainability of buildings in Europe, as it provides valuable insights into their environmental performance, considering the energy efficiency and sustainability aspects of buildings. The study's findings should be considered when setting minimum LCA-related requirements, in view of the provisions of the new EU policies expressed in the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) recast for defining the Global Warming Potential (GWP) of new buildings.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global building life cycle assessment: Comparative study of steel and concrete frames across European Union, USA, Canada, and Australia building codes
    Seyedabadi, Mohammad Reza
    Karrabi, Mohsen
    Shariati, Mostafa
    Karimi, Saghar
    Maghrebi, Mojtaba
    Eicker, Ursula
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2024, 304
  • [2] Life cycle energy assessment of a typical office building in Thailand
    Kofoworola, Oyeshola F.
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2009, 41 (10) : 1076 - 1083
  • [3] Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment in Building Energy Retrofitting; A Review
    Toosi, Hashem Amini
    Lavagna, Monica
    Leonforte, Fabrizio
    Del Pero, Claudio
    Aste, Niccolo
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 60 (60)
  • [4] Methodology for Life-Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Building Structures
    Caruso, M. C.
    Menna, C.
    Asprone, D.
    Prota, A.
    Manfredi, G.
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2017, 114 (02) : 323 - 336
  • [5] Dealing with uncertainties in comparative building life cycle assessment
    Pannier, Marie-Lise
    Schalbart, Patrick
    Peuportier, Bruno
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 242
  • [6] Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Building Construction: A Case Study in China
    Dong, Yahong
    Liu, Peng
    Hossain, Md. Uzzal
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [7] Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment of a Living Building
    Gardner, Haley M.
    Hasik, Vaclav
    Banawi, Abdulaziz
    Olinzock, Maureen
    Bilec, Melissa M.
    JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 26 (04)
  • [8] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of building materials for the evaluation of building sustainability: the case of thermal insulation materials
    Carabano, Rocio
    Ma Hernando, Susana
    Ruiz, Diego
    Bedoya, Cesar
    REVISTA DE LA CONSTRUCCION, 2017, 16 (01): : 22 - 32
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of Irish residential buildings and typical building envelope analysis
    Armstrong, A.
    Goggins, J.
    STRUCTURES AND ARCHITECTURE: CONCEPTS: APPLICATIONS AND CHALLENGES, 2013, : 600 - 607
  • [10] Environmental performance of building materials: life cycle assessment of a typical Sicilian marble
    Marzia Traverso
    Gianfranco Rizzo
    Matthias Finkbeiner
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2010, 15 : 104 - 114