Selection of Dental Implants and Restorations Among Dentists in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional, Questionnaire-Based Survey

BackgroundDental implants play a crucial role in modern dentistry, offering a durable and aesthetic option for toothreplacement. Understanding the preferences and practices of dentists regarding implant selection andrestoration can provide critical insights into current trends and potential areas for improvement. As such,the objective of this study was to discover characteristics determining the selection criteria and preferencesfor dental implants and restorations among Saudi Arabian dentists.MethodologyA cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey was conducted among Saudi Arabian dentists to assess theirpractices and preferences for dental implant selection and restoration. The survey explored variables,including age, gender, educational status, regional practice distribution, implant-related experience, loadingprotocols, and implant system preferences.ResultsA total of 742 dental professionals responded to our questionnaire. The study revealed that a significantmajority of Saudi Arabian dentists had placed (78.7%) and restored (72.9%) implants. Most dentists (78.6%)had participated in implant treatment planning. However, consistent usage of implant planning softwarewas relatively low (29.8%). Loading protocol preferences varied, with early loading favored for anterior teethand immediate loading for posterior teeth and edentulous patients. The main deterrents to immediateloading were patient type (27.0%), lack of training (19.9%), additional surgeries (19.9%), and administrativerestrictions (17.8%). Straumann was the most preferred implant system, with aesthetic outcomes consideredthe most important factor in system selection.ConclusionsThe study provides a comprehensive overview of dental implant practices among Saudi Arabian dentists. Ithighlights a strong emphasis on aesthetic outcomes, a diverse approach to loading protocols, and room forincreased usage of implant planning software. The findings suggest potential areas for further training andsupport, particularly in the use of immediate loading and implant planning software.