Scholarly Truth and the Hunger for Progress

被引:0
|
作者
Bromwich, David
机构
来源
SOCIAL RESEARCH | 2024年 / 91卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1353/sor.2024.a923119
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Public trust in the academy has been waning for more than a generation now, and in that time, the public support of academic scholarship has been under an almost constant threat of drastic cuts. As accountability has been bureaucratized inside the university itself, scholarship has also come under the suspicious eye of cost -benefit accounting performed by external agencies. This narrow version of accountability may press so far against autonomy that "tension" seems too weak a word to describe the divergence. Scholarly autonomy, if it means anything, means that the individual scholar, answerable to no judging body higher than his scholarly peers, is able to give the law to himself concerning the nature of the work and how it is to proceed.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 243
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条