Pursestring Closure versus Conventional Primary Closure Following Stoma Reversal to Reduce Surgical Site Infection Rate: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:43
|
作者
Hsieh, Meng-Chiao [1 ,2 ]
Kuo, Liang-Tseng [2 ,3 ]
Chi, Ching-Chi [2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Huang, Wen-Shih [1 ,5 ]
Chin, Chih-Chien [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Dept Surg, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Sports Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Univ, Grad Inst Clin Med Sci, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[6] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
Conventional primary closure; Pursestring closure; Surgical site infection; Stoma reversal; LOOP-ILEOSTOMY CLOSURE; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; SKIN CLOSURE; RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY; INCISIONAL HERNIA; WOUND INFECTIONS; CLINICAL-TRIAL; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000000401
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Stoma reversal is a surgical procedure commonly used following temporary defunctioning stoma surgery. Surgical site infection is one of the most common postoperative morbidities. A few skin closure methods have been developed to decrease surgical site infection. However, the optimal skin closure method is still in debate. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the surgical site infection rate and other postoperative outcomes between the pursestring closure and conventional primary closure techniques. DATA SOURCES: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant trials. STUDY SELECTION: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the surgical outcomes following pursestring closure and conventional primary closure techniques. INTERVENTION: We conducted the meta-analysis by using the random-effects model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of interest was surgical site infection following stoma reversal within 30 days after operation. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 4 randomized controlled trials with a total of 319 participants (162 in the pursestring closure group and 157 in the conventional primary closure group). Compared with the conventional primary closure group, the pursestring closure group had a significant decrease in surgical site infection (risk difference, -0.25; 95% CI, -0.36 to -0.15; p < 0.00001; number needed to treat = 4) and higher satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes (standard mean difference, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.13-1.27; p = 0.02). No other significant differences in operative time, length of hospital stay, and wound healing time were found between the 2 groups. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited to the lack of double blinding and long-term follow-up in the included trials. CONCLUSIONS: Pursestring closure has significantly fewer surgical site infections and achieves better cosmetic outcomes following stoma reversal than conventional primary closure.
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 815
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Purse-string closure versus conventional primary closure of wound following stoma reversal: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Rondelli, Fabio
    Franco, Laura
    Canger, Ruben Carlo Balzarotti
    Ceccarelli, Graziano
    Becattini, Cecilia
    Bugiantella, Walter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 52 : 208 - 213
  • [2] Systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials comparing purse string versus conventional linear closure of the wound following ileostomy (stoma) closure
    Bhatti, M. I.
    Shafique, M. S.
    Miles, W. F. A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 47 - 47
  • [3] Circular closure is associated with the lowest rate of surgical site infection following stoma reversal: a systematic review and multiple treatment meta-analysis
    Li, L. T.
    Hicks, S. C.
    Davila, J. A.
    Kao, L. S.
    Berger, R. L.
    Arita, N. A.
    Liang, M. K.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (06) : 406 - 416
  • [4] Risk factors for surgical site infection after stoma closure comparison between pursestring wound closure and conventional linear wound closure: Propensity score matching analysis
    Yamamoto, Masashi
    Tanaka, Keitaro
    Masubuchi, Shinsuke
    Ishii, Masatsugu
    Hamamoto, Hiroki
    Suzuki, Shigenori
    Ueda, Yasuhiko
    Okuda, Junji
    Uchiyama, Kazuhisa
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 215 (01): : 58 - 61
  • [5] Comparing Surgical Site Infection and Scar Cosmesis Between Conventional Linear Skin Closure Versus Purse-string Skin Closure in Stoma Reversal - A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sureshkumar, Sathasivam
    Jubel, Kunnathoor
    Ali, Manwar S.
    Vijayakumar, Chellappa
    Amaranathan, Anandhi
    Sundaramoorthy, Sudharsanan
    Palanivel, Chinnakali
    [J]. CUREUS, 2018, 10 (02):
  • [6] Purse-string closure versus conventional wound closure technique following stoma reversal: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Abdel-Maksoud, Ibrahim
    Farrag, Ahmed M.
    Elnabil-Mortada, Ahmed
    Khalil, Medhat
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 41 (04): : 1611 - 1617
  • [7] Comparing Surgical Site Infection Rate Between Primary Closure and Rhomboid Flap After Stoma Reversal
    Chu, Che-Ming
    Chen, Chih-Cheng
    Chang, Yu-Yao
    Syu, Kai-Jyun
    Lin, Shih-Lung
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 92 (1S) : S33 - S36
  • [8] Wound Protectors Reduce Surgical Site Infection A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Edwards, Janet P.
    Ho, Adelyn L.
    Tee, May C.
    Dixon, Elijah
    Ball, Chad G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (01) : 53 - 59
  • [9] Early versus Routine Stoma Closure in Patients With Colorectal Resection: A Meta-Analysis of 7 Randomized Controlled Trials
    Li, Laiyuan
    Guo, Yinyin
    [J]. SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2021, 28 (01) : 166 - 167
  • [10] Early Versus Routine Stoma Closure in Patients With Colorectal Resection: A Meta-Analysis of 7 Randomized Controlled Trials
    Guo, Yinyin
    Luo, Yanxin
    Zhao, Hui
    Bai, Liangliang
    Li, Juan
    Li, Laiyuan
    [J]. SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2020, 27 (03) : 291 - 298