Life-cycle assessment of Water-filled Glass (WFG)

被引:0
|
作者
Cavana, G. [1 ]
Gutai, M. [2 ]
Kheybari, A. G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Turin, Italy
[2] Loughborough Univ, Loughborough, Leics, England
[3] Tech Univ Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
关键词
THERMAL PERFORMANCE; WINDOW;
D O I
10.1201/9781003023555-128
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Energy properties of building envelopes play a major role in the carbon footprint of the built environment, which is responsible for about 40% of the anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The impact of building envelope is twofold: firstly, better insulation (U-Value) leads to a reduction of energy demand, secondly, the envelope itself is responsible for a significant share of the overall embodied energy of a building. The two energies are often in inverse relationship, e.g. lowering operational energy with more insulation or Building Integrated PV (BIPV) also increases embodied impact. While it can be argued that the operational energy has higher proportion in the life cycle of a building which justifies such investment, one should also recognize that climate goals are becoming more ambitious and have shorter time scales than lifespan of a building (e.g. climate goals for 2030). In light of these developments, it can be argued that there is an increasing demand for energy-efficient facade technologies that can lower operational energy consumption compared to standard glass with low impact on embodied energy. This paper presents a whole life-cycle assessment (LCA) for water-filled glass (WFG) technology. WFG is a hybrid transparent facade construction that utilizes a water infill for reducing energy demand (47-72% compared to double glazing (M. Gutai & Kheybari 2020)) and improving thermal comfort. This innovation presents a unique approach compared to other glazing systems because the operational energy reduction of WFG is achieved by an added water infill, which has minimal embodied energy requirement. The significance of this evaluation is that a comprehensive LCA of WFG for an office is presented here for the first time. The paper evaluates the use of WFG in a theoretical project in two climates and compares it with existing standard glass options. Additionally, as a novel approach, the paper introduces the benefit of WFG as a hybrid glass facade where fluid medium is combined with a solid structure to build on the advantages of both. This new facade design approach can represent a sustainable strategy to improve the overall environmental impact of new and existing buildings and offer a new paradigm in facade design where glass envelope becomes an asset for environmental impact instead of being a liability.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1076
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global carbon viability of glass technologies: Life-cycle assessment of standard, advanced and water-filled glass (WFG) building envelopes
    Gutai, Matyas
    Mok, Brandon
    Cavana, Giulio
    Kheybari, Abolfazl Ganji
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 367
  • [2] Energy consumption of water -filled glass (WFG) hybrid building envelope
    Gutai, Matyas
    Kheybari, Abolfazl Ganji
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 218
  • [3] Life-cycle assessment modelling and life-cycle assessment evaluation of a triboelement
    Wani, M. F.
    Anand, A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART J-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING TRIBOLOGY, 2010, 224 (J11) : 1209 - 1220
  • [4] Operational Life-Cycle Assessment and Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Water Use in Multioccupant Buildings
    Arpke, Angela
    Hutzler, Neil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 11 (03) : 99 - 109
  • [5] LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT
    WEISSMAN, AB
    [J]. ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 11 (01) : 18 - 18
  • [6] Life-cycle assessment
    Riebel, P
    [J]. PULP & PAPER-CANADA, 2002, 103 (04) : 57 - 57
  • [7] Life-cycle assessment
    Harsch, M
    Schuckert, M
    Eyerer, P
    Saur, K
    [J]. ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES, 1996, 149 (06): : 43 - 46
  • [8] Life-cycle assessment - An abridged life-cycle assessment of electric vehicle batteries
    Steele, NLC
    Allen, DT
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 32 (01) : 40A - 46A
  • [9] Environmental life-cycle assessment
    Randolph E. Kirchain Jr
    Jeremy R. Gregory
    Elsa A. Olivetti
    [J]. Nature Materials, 2017, 16 : 693 - 697
  • [10] LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS ASSESSMENT
    SULLIVAN, JL
    YOUNG, SB
    [J]. ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES, 1995, 147 (02): : 37 - 40