Creating the conditions for collaborative decision-making in co-design

被引:0
|
作者
Thorburn, Kathryn [1 ]
Waks, Shifra [1 ]
Aadam, Bani [1 ]
Fisher, Karen R. [2 ]
Spooner, Catherine [1 ]
Harris, Mark F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales UNSW Sydney, Ctr Primary Hlth Care & Equ, Sydney, Australia
[2] UNSW Sydney, Fac Arts Design & Architecture, Social Policy Res Ctr SPRC, Sydney, Australia
关键词
Co-design; co-designer experience; collaborative decisions; healthcare; primary care; HEALTH; COPRODUCTION; SERVICES; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1080/15710882.2024.2349578
中图分类号
J [艺术];
学科分类号
13 ; 1301 ;
摘要
Research into co-designers' experience of co-design processes is uncommon, despite expanding use of co-design to improve and innovate in healthcare. This study aimed to identify how an online co-design was experienced, how it achieved its outcomes and the implications for healthcare co-design. Eleven co-designers were interviewed about their participation in an online, lived experience co-led, co-design that aimed to improve the physical healthcare of mental health service users in primary care and mental health settings. Analysis of group and individual interviews and co-design documentation involved an initial inductive coding process, followed by a more focussed theoretical coding process and the application of an existing conceptual framework to test the analysis. Three themes were identified - generating knowledge, creating space and influencing change. Each theme was characterised by underlying interdependent tensions - individual and collective, stabilising and transforming, internal and external, which operated together to facilitate collaboration. Time was an essential resource for engaging these processes. Efforts to create the conditions for co-design in healthcare may be enhanced when attention and time is given to underlying interdependent tensions that interact to support knowledge co-creation, collaboration and change.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Co-Design and Co-Decision: Decision Making on Collaborative Design Platforms
    Stelzle, Benjamin
    Jannack, Anja
    Noennig, Joerg Rainer
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 2017, 112 : 2435 - 2444
  • [2] Co-Design: digital tools for knowledge-building and decision-making in planning and design
    Mourao Moura, Ana Clara
    Campagna, Michele
    [J]. DISEGNARECON, 2018, 11 (20)
  • [3] Decision-making and control co-design for multi-agent systems: a hierarchical design methodology
    Tang, Yutao
    Qin, Huashu
    [J]. CONTROL THEORY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 20 (03) : 439 - 441
  • [4] Decision-making and control co-design for multi-agent systems: a hierarchical design methodology
    Yutao Tang
    Huashu Qin
    [J]. Control Theory and Technology, 2022, 20 : 439 - 441
  • [5] Collaborative design decision-making as social process
    Campbell, Chris
    Roth, Wolff-Michael
    Jornet, Alfredo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (03) : 294 - 311
  • [6] Creating a dialogue for effective collaborative decision-making: A case study with Michigan stakeholders
    Dreelin, Erin A.
    Rose, Joan B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2008, 34 (01) : 12 - 22
  • [7] COLLABORATIVE MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING
    CHRISTENSEN, C
    LARSON, JR
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1993, 13 (04) : 339 - 346
  • [8] The collaborative decision-making framework
    Andrle, Stephen J.
    D'Ignazio, Janet
    [J]. TR News, 2009, (260): : 17 - 23
  • [9] Collaborative decision-making process
    Akiyama, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 45422 - 45422
  • [10] Exploring Human-Data Interaction in Clinical Decision-making Using Scenarios: Co-design Study
    Tendedez, Helena
    Ferrario, Maria-Angela
    McNaney, Roisin
    Gradinar, Adrian
    [J]. JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2022, 9 (02):