Collaboration matters: A randomized controlled trial of patient-clinician collaboration in suicide risk assessment and intervention

被引:0
|
作者
Lohani, Monika [1 ]
Bryan, Craig J. [2 ]
Elsey, Jamie S. [3 ]
Dutton, Sam [3 ]
Findley, Samuel P. [3 ]
Langenecker, Scott A. [2 ]
West, Kristen [3 ]
Baker, Justin C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Psychol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Hlth, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Educ Psychol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
Suicide prevention; Structured interview; Narrative assessment; Safety planning intervention; Crisis response planning; Ecological momentary assessment; Randomized control trial; LONGITUDINAL TRAJECTORIES; BEHAVIORS; IDEATION; SAFETY; METAANALYSIS; ADOLESCENTS; CONTRACTS; THOUGHTS; SCALE; ARMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Clinician collaboration can help high -risk individuals to manage their suicidal crises. However, limited research has directly examined how higher patient -clinician collaboration during assessment and intervention can effectively reduce suicidal ideation. This novel randomized clinical trial compared a high vs. low level of patient -clinician collaboration by pairing commonly used assessment (Structured Interview vs. Narrative Assessment) and intervention approaches (Safety Planning Intervention vs. Crisis Response Planning). We hypothesized that the interventions involving higher (than lower) patient -clinician collaboration during assessment (Narrative Assessment) or intervention (Crisis Response Planning) would lead to larger reductions in suicidal ideation. Methods: Eighty-two participants with a history of suicide ideation and/or attempts were randomly assigned to one of the four interventions varying in patient -clinician collaboration. After attrition, sixty-six participants completed the study. Suicidal ideation via ecological momentary assessment was measured 14 days before and 14 days after treatment. Results: Although the severity of suicidal ideation decreased in all groups, the two groups that included highly collaborative assessment had larger pre -post reductions in suicidal ideation (Narrative Assessment +Safety Plan; d within = 0.26, and Narrative Assessment +Crisis Response Plan; d within = 0.19) than the groups that included a checklist -based assessment (Structured Interview). Limitations: Longer follow-up periods with a larger sample would have provided an understanding of the durability of intervention effects. Conclusion: Results suggest that the inclusion of higher patient -clinician collaboration techniques during suicide risk assessment can effectively reduce suicidal thoughts. Thus, clinician -led collaborative risk assessment approaches can enhance the effects of safety planning -type interventions among patients with elevated risk for suicide versus checklist -based assessment approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 393
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-Clinician Collaboration in the Development of an IBD Transfer Toolkit
    Kennedy, Samantha T.
    Maddux, Michele Herzer
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2019, 144 (03)
  • [2] Barriers to Patient-Clinician Collaboration in Asthma Management: The Patient Experience
    Newcomb, Patricia A.
    McGrath, Kelly Wong
    Covington, Jack K.
    Lazarus, Stephen C.
    Janson, Susan L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2010, 47 (02) : 192 - 197
  • [3] Patient and clinician collaboration in the design of a national randomized breast cancer trial
    Marsden, J
    Bradburn, J
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2004, 7 (01) : 6 - 17
  • [4] Patient-clinician collaboration in making care fit: A qualitative analysis of clinical consultations in diabetes care
    Kidanemariam, Martha
    Graner, Matthijs A.
    Bos, Willem Jan W.
    Schroijen, Marielle A.
    de Koning, Eelco J. P.
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Pieterse, Arwen H.
    Kunneman, Marleen
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 125
  • [5] Case study: A patient-clinician collaboration that identified and prioritized evidence gaps and stimulated research development
    Buckley, Brian S.
    Grant, Adrian M.
    Glazener, Cathryn M. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (05) : 483 - 489
  • [6] How Shared Is Shared Decision Making? Reaching the Full Potential of Patient-Clinician Collaboration in Mental Health
    Treichler, Emily B. H.
    Rabin, Borsika A.
    Cohen, Amy N.
    Light, Gregory A.
    [J]. HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 29 (05) : 361 - 369
  • [7] Remote Patient-Reported Outcomes and Activity Monitoring to Improve Patient-Clinician Communication Regarding Symptoms and Functional Status: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Parikh, Ravi B.
    Schriver, Emily
    Ferrell, William J.
    Wakim, Jonathan
    Williamson, Joelle
    Khan, Neda
    Kopinsky, Michael
    Balachandran, Mohan
    Gabriel, Peter E.
    Schuchter, Lynn M.
    Patel, Mitesh S.
    Shulman, Lawrence N.
    Manz, Christopher R.
    [J]. JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2023, 19 (12) : 1143 - +
  • [8] Online Suicide Risk Screening and Intervention With College Students: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    King, Cheryl A.
    Eisenberg, Daniel
    Zheng, Kai
    Czyz, Ewa
    Kramer, Anne
    Horwitz, Adam
    Chermack, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 83 (03) : 630 - 636
  • [9] Influence of patient-clinician relationship style on acupuncture outcomes in functional dyspepsia: A multi-site randomized controlled trial in Korea
    Ko, Seok-Jae
    Kim, Keumji
    Kaptchuk, Ted J.
    Napadow, Vitaly
    Kuo, Braden
    Gerber, Jessica
    Ha, Na-Yeon
    Lee, Junhee
    Kelley, John M.
    Park, Jae-Woo
    Kim, Jinsung
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 121
  • [10] The Influence of the Patient-Clinician Relationship on Healthcare Outcomes: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Kelley, John M.
    Kraft-Todd, Gordon
    Schapira, Lidia
    Kossowsky, Joe
    Riess, Helen
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04):