Renewable energy allocation in Multi-Owned Buildings for Sustainable Transition: A novel Evidence-Based Decision-Making framework

被引:1
|
作者
Poshnath, Aravind [1 ,2 ]
Rismanchi, Behzad [1 ]
Rajabifard, Abbas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Engn & IT, Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Grp, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Spatial Data Infrastruct & Land Adm, Dept Infrastruct Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Energy entitlement; Renewable energy allocation; Evidence-based Decision-Making; Suitability analysis; TOPSIS; Multi-owned buildings; SUITABILITY ANALYSIS; SELF-CONSUMPTION; APARTMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114601
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Adopting Renewable Energy Systems (RES) in Multi-Owned Buildings (MOBs) is critical for achieving sustainability goals, yet the equitable allocation of energy from a jointly-owned RES to individual apartments remains overlooked in practice and literature. Current practices, rooted in models of common cost allocation, fail to address the dynamic traits of energy allocation and disregard the energy entitlement of each apartment, necessitating a tailored approach for renewable energy allocation in MOBs. This paper emphasises energy entitlement and introduces a novel, evidence-based decision-making framework assessing nine distinct energy allocation models for their suitability in diverse MOB typologies, characterised by physical and social factors, and presents a ranked list. Our findings reveal extensive variation in model suitability depending on the building typology. Equal energy allocation minimised financial disparities, while demand-based allocation was significantly effective for older, mid-rise buildings with fewer tenants. Conversely, the flat-fee model was found unsuitable regardless of building type. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that the suitable model for a building typology may not always align with the objectives of RES installation, thus endorsing an 'objective proximity' analysis. The proposed framework serves as a valuable guide for stakeholders, including the owners' corporations, policymakers, and industries, to make well-informed decisions for a smooth transition to renewable energy. It lays the foundation for potential expansion to other building types while underscoring the necessity for adaptive policies in promoting RES adoption.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adoption of Renewable Energy Systems in common properties of multi-owned buildings: Introduction of ?Energy Entitlement?
    Poshnath, Aravind
    Rismanchi, Behzad
    Rajabifard, Abbas
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2023, 174
  • [2] THE EVIDENCE PROJECT: A COMPREHENSIVE FRAMEWORK FOR EVIDENCE-BASED DECISION-MAKING
    Ruddy, R. W.
    [J]. INJURY PREVENTION, 2010, 16 : A184 - A185
  • [3] Integrated hesitant fuzzy-based decision-making framework for evaluating sustainable and renewable energy
    Sahu, Kavita
    Srivastava, R. K.
    Kumar, Sarvesh
    Saxena, Manish
    Gupta, Bineet Kumar
    Verma, Ravi Prakash
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DATA SCIENCE AND ANALYTICS, 2023, 16 (03) : 371 - 390
  • [4] Integrated hesitant fuzzy-based decision-making framework for evaluating sustainable and renewable energy
    Kavita Sahu
    R. K. Srivastava
    Sarvesh Kumar
    Manish Saxena
    Bineet Kumar Gupta
    Ravi Prakash Verma
    [J]. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 2023, 16 : 371 - 390
  • [5] Evidence-based decision-making
    Smith, ER
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 19 (06) : 729 - 730
  • [6] Evidence-Based Decision-Making
    Kurien, Vino Tito V.
    Shamsuddeen, Suhana
    Mahitha, M. C.
    Rasheed, Diya S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAD & NECK PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, 2022, 10 (01): : 48 - 52
  • [7] Evidence-Based Decision-Making is Individualized Clinical Decision-Making
    Gordon Guyatt
    [J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2007, (02) : 85 - 92
  • [8] Education, Communication and Decision-Making on Renewable and Sustainable Energy
    Ioannou, Konstantinos
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (19)
  • [9] Teaching evidence-based decision-making
    Sevdalis, N
    McCulloch, P
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 86 (01) : 59 - +
  • [10] Evidence-based decision-making in endodontics
    Eyal Rosen
    Igor Tsesis
    [J]. Clinical Dentistry Reviewed, 1 (1):