Readability of Trauma-related Patient Education Materials From the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Orthopaedic Trauma Association Websites

被引:0
|
作者
Ghanem, Diane [1 ]
Covarrubias, Oscar [2 ]
Maxson, Ridge [2 ]
Sabharwal, Samir [1 ]
Shafiq, Babar [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Johns Hopkins Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00449
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Web-based resources serve as a fundamental educational platform for orthopaedic trauma patients; however, they are frequently written above the recommended sixth-grade reading level, and previous studies have demonstrated this for the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) web-based articles. In this study, we perform an updated assessment of the readability of AAOS trauma-related educational articles as compared with injury-matched education materials developed by the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA). Methods: All 46 AAOS trauma-related web-based (https://www.orthoinfo.org/) patient education articles were analyzed for readability. Two independent reviewers used (1) the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and (2) the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) algorithms to calculate the readability level. Mean readability scores were compared across body part categories. A one-sample t-test was done to compare mean FKGL with the recommended sixth-grade readability level and the average American adult reading level. A two-sample t-test was used to compare the readability scores of the AAOS trauma-related articles with those of the OTA. Results: The average (SD) FKGL and FRE for the AAOS articles were 8.9 (0.74) and 57.2 (5.8), respectively. All articles were written above the sixth-grade reading level. The average readability of the AAOS articles was significantly greater than the recommended sixth-grade reading level (P < 0.001). The average FKGL and FRE for all AAOS articles were significantly higher compared with those of the OTA articles (8.9 +/- 0.74 versus 8.1 +/- 1.14, P < 0.001 and 57.2 +/- 5.8 versus 65.6 +/- 6.6, P < 0.001, respectively). Excellent agreement was observed between raters for the FKGL 0.956 (95% confidence interval, 0.922 to 0.975) and FRE 0.993 (95% confidence interval, 0.987 to 0.996). Discussion: Our findings suggest that after almost a decade, the readability of the AAOS trauma-related articles remains unchanged. The AAOS and OTA trauma patient education materials have high readability levels and may be too difficult for patient comprehension. A need remains to improve the readability of these commonly used trauma education materials.
引用
收藏
页码:e642 / e650
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Readability of Trauma-Related Patient Education Materials From the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
    Eltorai, Adam E. M.
    Thomas, Nathan P.
    Yang, Heejae
    Daniels, Alan H.
    Born, Christopher T.
    [J]. TRAUMA MONTHLY, 2016, 21 (01)
  • [2] Readability of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association Patient Education Tool
    Ghanem, Diane
    Covarrubias, Oscar
    Harris, Andrew B.
    Shafiq, Babar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2023, 37 (08) : E307 - E311
  • [3] Readability of patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America web sites
    Badarudeen, Sameer
    Sabharwal, Sanjeev
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (01): : 199 - 204
  • [4] Readability of Sports Injury and Prevention Patient Education Materials From the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Website
    Minoughan, Chelsea
    Schumaier, Adam
    Kakazu, Rafael
    Grawe, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2018, 2 (03):
  • [5] Readability of Arthroscopy-Related Patient Education Materials From the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Arthroscopy Association of North America Web Sites
    Yi, Paul H.
    Ganta, Abhishek
    Hussein, Khalil I.
    Frank, Rachel M.
    Jawa, Andrew
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 29 (06): : 1108 - 1112
  • [6] Readability and quality of online patient materials in the websites of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association and related orthopaedic societies
    Yamaguchi, Satoshi
    Iwata, Kazunari
    Nishizumi, Kanako
    Ito, Akane
    Ohtori, Seiji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2023, 28 (04) : 901 - 906
  • [7] Response to Letter to the Editor: Readability of Sports Injury and Prevention Patient Education Materials From the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Website
    Fischer, Stuart J.
    Giblin, Laura Hoffmeier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2018, 2 (10):
  • [8] SPECIAL PRESENTATION TO JAPANESE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION FROM AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS
    SMITH, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1966, A 48 (08): : 1651 - &
  • [9] Comparative Readability of Shoulder and Elbow Patient Education Materials within Orthopaedic Websites
    Beutel, Bryan G.
    Danna, Natalie R.
    Melamed, Eitan
    Capo, John T.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2015, 73 (04): : 249 - 256
  • [10] Readability of Patient Education Materials on the American Association for Surgery of Trauma Website
    Eltorai, Adam E. M.
    Ghanian, Soha
    Adams, Charles A., Jr.
    Born, Christopher T.
    Daniels, Alan H.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF TRAUMA RESEARCH, 2014, 3 (02)