Approaches to learning and contract cheating: exploring the mediating roles of authorship perceptions

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Yinxia [1 ]
Ni, Fengqin [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Normal Univ, Coll Educ, Minzhu Bldg, Fuzhou 350007, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
Approach to learning; contract cheating; authorship perception; Chinese college student; academic cheating; AUTHORIAL IDENTITY; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS; PLAGIARISM; MOTIVATION; GOALS; BARON;
D O I
10.1080/03075079.2024.2352055
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
As an undesired learning behavior, contract cheating has its roots in college students' difficulties in engaging in a challenging written assessment. To better understand this process, the study collects multicampus survey data from 910 Chinese undergraduates to explore the effects of deep and surface approaches to learning on contract cheating, focusing on the mediating roles of authorship perceptions. The authorship perceptions are measured with three subfactors: understanding authorship and plagiarism (UAP), authorial approach to writing (AAW), and incorporating others' writing (IOW). Structural equation modeling (SEM) reveals a notable positive direct effect of the surface approach to learning on contract cheating and an insignificant direct effect of the deep approach. The results further report significant indirect effects of both deep and surface approaches to learning on contract cheating via UAP and IOW, while the indirect effects via AAW are both insignificant. These results highlight the importance of providing formal and continuous pedagogical support to enhance their learning, particularly academic writing, in inhibiting contract cheating.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contract cheating and assessment design: exploring the relationship
    Bretag, Tracey
    Harper, Rowena
    Burton, Michael
    Ellis, Cath
    Newton, Philip
    van Haeringen, Karen
    Saddiqui, Sonia
    Rozenberg, Pearl
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (05) : 676 - 691
  • [2] LEGAL APPROACHES TO TACKLING ESSAY MILLS AND 'CONTRACT CHEATING'
    Draper, Michael
    Newton, Phil
    [J]. PLAGIARISM ACROSS EUROPE AND BEYOND 2017, 2017, : 231 - 231
  • [3] Detecting Contract Cheating Using Learning Analytics
    Trezise, Kelly
    Ryan, Tracii
    de Barba, Paula
    Kennedy, Gregor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEARNING ANALYTICS, 2019, 6 (03): : 90 - +
  • [4] Cheaters on Twitter: an analysis of engagement approaches of contract cheating services
    Amigud, Alexander
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (03) : 692 - 705
  • [5] Exploring contract cheating in further education: student engagement and academic integrity challenges
    Rahimi, Roya
    Jones, Jenni
    Bailey, Carol
    [J]. ETHICS AND EDUCATION, 2024, 19 (01) : 38 - 58
  • [6] CHEATING IN ONLINE LEARNING PROGRAMS: LEARNERS' PERCEPTIONS AND SOLUTIONS
    Valizadeh, Mohammadreza
    [J]. TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2022, 23 (01): : 195 - 209
  • [7] CONTRACT CHEATING: A CONSIDERATION OF SOCIAL LEARNING, ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP AND GLOBAL DIMENSIONS
    Somers, Trudy
    [J]. PLAGIARISM ACROSS EUROPE AND BEYOND 2017, 2017, : 229 - 229
  • [8] Can software improve marker accuracy at detecting contract cheating? A pilot study of the Turnitin authorship investigate alpha
    Dawson, Phillip
    Sutherland-Smith, Wendy
    Ricksen, Mark
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (04) : 473 - 482
  • [9] EXPLORING STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF LEARNING ANALYTICS IN HIGHER EDUCATION - DEVELOPING APPROACHES FOR CONSULTATION AND FEEDBACK
    Richardson, J.
    [J]. 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2018), 2018, : 3675 - 3680
  • [10] EXPLORING STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF PLAGIARISM AND CHEATING IN ACCOUNTING PROFESSION ETHICS' CONTEXT: A ROMANIAN EXPERIENCE
    Dascalu, Cornelia
    Caraiani, Chirata
    Lungu, Camelia Iuliana
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (AMIS 2016), 2016, : 352 - 371